<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Morning Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-151425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-151425</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#24   Nadine Strossen 
...our view has never been that civil liberties are necessarily coextensive with constitutional rights...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, I guess that explains why they don&#039;t call it the American Bill of Rights Union.   The right to defend yourself is not a civil liberty unless you&#039;re defending yourself from the government.  Of course, a lot of people think the Second Amendment exists for that very purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#24   Nadine Strossen<br />
&#8230;our view has never been that civil liberties are necessarily coextensive with constitutional rights&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I guess that explains why they don&#8217;t call it the American Bill of Rights Union.   The right to defend yourself is not a civil liberty unless you&#8217;re defending yourself from the government.  Of course, a lot of people think the Second Amendment exists for that very purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadine Strossen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-151373</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadine Strossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-151373</guid>
		<description>Putting all that aside, I don&#039;t want to dwell on constitutional analysis, because our view has never been that civil liberties are necessarily coextensive with constitutional rights. Conversely, I guess &lt;b&gt;the fact that something is mentioned in the Constitution doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that it is a fundamental civil liberty.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting all that aside, I don&#8217;t want to dwell on constitutional analysis, because our view has never been that civil liberties are necessarily coextensive with constitutional rights. Conversely, I guess <b>the fact that something is mentioned in the Constitution doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that it is a fundamental civil liberty.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Brown Acid</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-151024</link>
		<dc:creator>The Brown Acid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-151024</guid>
		<description>God damn it Radley, I was expecting to see an actual encyclopedia full of famous acts of piracy and famous pirates n shit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God damn it Radley, I was expecting to see an actual encyclopedia full of famous acts of piracy and famous pirates n shit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-151023</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-151023</guid>
		<description>I think what Supercat&#039;s saying may refer to the ACLU&#039;s defense of the First Amendment, in that speech which everyone agrees with rarely needs to be defended; it&#039;s only objectionable speech which is likely to need their protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what Supercat&#8217;s saying may refer to the ACLU&#8217;s defense of the First Amendment, in that speech which everyone agrees with rarely needs to be defended; it&#8217;s only objectionable speech which is likely to need their protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150913</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150913</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That would be a good argument if the only people whose rights were being violated were bad.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Most people whose rights are violated have, at some point, broken the law. Sorry, but it&#039;s kinda like Jesus did... in order to protect all our rights they have to help the prostitutes and the murderers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That would be a good argument if the only people whose rights were being violated were bad.</p></blockquote>
<p>Most people whose rights are violated have, at some point, broken the law. Sorry, but it&#8217;s kinda like Jesus did&#8230; in order to protect all our rights they have to help the prostitutes and the murderers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150875</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150875</guid>
		<description>I finally get to find out what &quot;yarrrr&quot; means!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally get to find out what &#8220;yarrrr&#8221; means!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJH2</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150826</link>
		<dc:creator>JJH2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150826</guid>
		<description>Supercat: 

Could you be a little more specific? I&#039;m not sure what your argument is, and my hunch is that you are mischaracterizing the ACLU&#039;s position. I don&#039;t think the ACLU deliberately seeks to defend &quot;bad people,&quot; nor are their results in most cases limited to affecting the immediate parties. If the ACLU manages to win a case that sets a new, more protective standard for say, Searches and Seizures, the beneficiaries are not just &quot;bad people,&quot; but rather everybody subject to government search and seizure. Everybody benefits, not just &quot;bad people,&quot; whatever you mean by that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supercat: </p>
<p>Could you be a little more specific? I&#8217;m not sure what your argument is, and my hunch is that you are mischaracterizing the ACLU&#8217;s position. I don&#8217;t think the ACLU deliberately seeks to defend &#8220;bad people,&#8221; nor are their results in most cases limited to affecting the immediate parties. If the ACLU manages to win a case that sets a new, more protective standard for say, Searches and Seizures, the beneficiaries are not just &#8220;bad people,&#8221; but rather everybody subject to government search and seizure. Everybody benefits, not just &#8220;bad people,&#8221; whatever you mean by that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150823</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150823</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There are close to a 1000 comments on that ACLU blog post and I didn’t see a single one supportive of the ACLU’s collective interpretation.&lt;/i&gt;

IIRC, out of the first 700 or so posts I looked at shortly after Heller, there were about five that were supportive.  I haven&#039;t looked at the other ~300 posted since then.

&lt;i&gt;The basis for my financial support is the great work that they actually do.&lt;/i&gt;

I would strongly suggest that you look at the ALCU with a somewhat more discerning eye.  The ACLU often makes the argument that they must protect bad people because--even if the rights of good people were respected today--allowing the state to violate the rights of bad people would result in it expanding to attack the rights of good people as well.

That would be a good argument if the only people whose rights were being violated were bad.  It is at best, however, a clear mis-allocation of resources to only protect the rights of bad people while ignoring clear violations of the rights of good ones.  As it happens, there have been many cases where police have demonstrated a preference to go after mostly-good people rather than bad ones.  This tendency should alarm anyone who&#039;s actually interested in civil liberties, but the tactics of the ACLU actually encourage such behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There are close to a 1000 comments on that ACLU blog post and I didn’t see a single one supportive of the ACLU’s collective interpretation.</i></p>
<p>IIRC, out of the first 700 or so posts I looked at shortly after Heller, there were about five that were supportive.  I haven&#8217;t looked at the other ~300 posted since then.</p>
<p><i>The basis for my financial support is the great work that they actually do.</i></p>
<p>I would strongly suggest that you look at the ALCU with a somewhat more discerning eye.  The ACLU often makes the argument that they must protect bad people because&#8211;even if the rights of good people were respected today&#8211;allowing the state to violate the rights of bad people would result in it expanding to attack the rights of good people as well.</p>
<p>That would be a good argument if the only people whose rights were being violated were bad.  It is at best, however, a clear mis-allocation of resources to only protect the rights of bad people while ignoring clear violations of the rights of good ones.  As it happens, there have been many cases where police have demonstrated a preference to go after mostly-good people rather than bad ones.  This tendency should alarm anyone who&#8217;s actually interested in civil liberties, but the tactics of the ACLU actually encourage such behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunder</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150820</link>
		<dc:creator>wunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150820</guid>
		<description>Inexplicable?  The (national) ACLU is is as beholden to its donors as the politicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inexplicable?  The (national) ACLU is is as beholden to its donors as the politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150807</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150807</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#15  Greg C. 

ALL rights are individual rights. Right? Right?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well said.  Go ahead and take the rest of the day off.  You earned it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#15  Greg C. </p>
<p>ALL rights are individual rights. Right? Right?</p></blockquote>
<p>Well said.  Go ahead and take the rest of the day off.  You earned it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg C.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150793</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150793</guid>
		<description>ALL rights are individual rights. Right? Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALL rights are individual rights. Right? Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg C.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150792</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150792</guid>
		<description>Well, when you use the conservative Bob Barr to represent libertarianism, there are bound to be some misconceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, when you use the conservative Bob Barr to represent libertarianism, there are bound to be some misconceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150767</guid>
		<description>In addition to what KBCraig noted, the Nevada branch of the ACLU also has stated that they agree with the Supreme Court that the second amendment protects an individual right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to what KBCraig noted, the Nevada branch of the ACLU also has stated that they agree with the Supreme Court that the second amendment protects an individual right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad Drac</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150732</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad Drac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150732</guid>
		<description>Cook is a fucktard, and Time is not fit to wipe one&#039;s ass with. I will never understand how stupid a person has to be to think something is better just because it is old OR new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cook is a fucktard, and Time is not fit to wipe one&#8217;s ass with. I will never understand how stupid a person has to be to think something is better just because it is old OR new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBCraig</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150729</link>
		<dc:creator>KBCraig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150729</guid>
		<description>The state CLUs are largely autonomous, and some have taken a very different stance. The Texas CLU supported passage of unlicensed carry in cars, and the Utah CLU has issued a statement agreeing with the Heller decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The state CLUs are largely autonomous, and some have taken a very different stance. The Texas CLU supported passage of unlicensed carry in cars, and the Utah CLU has issued a statement agreeing with the Heller decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.d.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150719</link>
		<dc:creator>j.d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150719</guid>
		<description>no one forces you to believe catholic. rather, it is better to live under the laws and policies they design. i would rather be a catholic and live in a fully free society than a non-catholic and live in a theocracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no one forces you to believe catholic. rather, it is better to live under the laws and policies they design. i would rather be a catholic and live in a fully free society than a non-catholic and live in a theocracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sydney Carton</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150709</link>
		<dc:creator>Sydney Carton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150709</guid>
		<description>The thing is, in this country, no one forces you to be a Catholic.  And crapping over their beliefs is so easy.  What are they going to do?  Forgive you?  Ooooh!  Scary!

That guy should get a freaking life.  All he&#039;s doing is showing he&#039;s a bigot.  He&#039;s also making a great google search for his future employers.  Now there&#039;s divine justice for you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, in this country, no one forces you to be a Catholic.  And crapping over their beliefs is so easy.  What are they going to do?  Forgive you?  Ooooh!  Scary!</p>
<p>That guy should get a freaking life.  All he&#8217;s doing is showing he&#8217;s a bigot.  He&#8217;s also making a great google search for his future employers.  Now there&#8217;s divine justice for you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLM</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150708</link>
		<dc:creator>JLM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150708</guid>
		<description>The ACLU&#039;s position on the 2nd really is frustrating. Their challenge to the recent Fisa legislation is an example of how right they are on a lot of things. I think their &quot;collective right&quot; stance speaks to the fact that a large percentage of their donations come from the hard left, so they don&#039;t want to piss off any of those people and bite the hand that feeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ACLU&#8217;s position on the 2nd really is frustrating. Their challenge to the recent Fisa legislation is an example of how right they are on a lot of things. I think their &#8220;collective right&#8221; stance speaks to the fact that a large percentage of their donations come from the hard left, so they don&#8217;t want to piss off any of those people and bite the hand that feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikestermike</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikestermike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150694</guid>
		<description>I think its hurtful the Catholics take the body of Christ and make poo out of it. For shame. 

Its a goddamned cracker. Or godblessed, depending on your imagination. Still, a cracker. Maybe holey, not holy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its hurtful the Catholics take the body of Christ and make poo out of it. For shame. </p>
<p>Its a goddamned cracker. Or godblessed, depending on your imagination. Still, a cracker. Maybe holey, not holy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miggs</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/13/sunday-morning-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150686</link>
		<dc:creator>Miggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10274#comment-150686</guid>
		<description>There are close to a 1000 comments on that ACLU blog post and I didn&#039;t see a single one supportive of the ACLU&#039;s collective interpretation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are close to a 1000 comments on that ACLU blog post and I didn&#8217;t see a single one supportive of the ACLU&#8217;s collective interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

