<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lunch Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManM</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-145428</link>
		<dc:creator>ManM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-145428</guid>
		<description>Surprised the article didn&#039;t mention that great South African punk rock band Fokofpolisiekar.  Just &quot;Polisiekar&quot; to those with virgin ears.

As for Mary Schmich, I&#039;ve got a great rule that should be enforced ruthlessly:  MYOB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised the article didn&#8217;t mention that great South African punk rock band Fokofpolisiekar.  Just &#8220;Polisiekar&#8221; to those with virgin ears.</p>
<p>As for Mary Schmich, I&#8217;ve got a great rule that should be enforced ruthlessly:  MYOB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Brown Acid</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-143986</link>
		<dc:creator>The Brown Acid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-143986</guid>
		<description>&#124;   Paddy &#124;  July 2nd, 2008 at 12:36 pm

&quot;Note to the liberal running this sight, I don’t see that Republicans ever said being a POW was what quailifies McC to run the military. Stop trying to play both sides.&quot;


LOL Did this fucking tool just call Radley a liberal??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>|   Paddy |  July 2nd, 2008 at 12:36 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;Note to the liberal running this sight, I don’t see that Republicans ever said being a POW was what quailifies McC to run the military. Stop trying to play both sides.&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL Did this fucking tool just call Radley a liberal??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-143893</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-143893</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not trying to be funny or mean, but is Mary Schmich a guy?

That picture on the site looks like a drag queen. It almost led me to believe that this is a satirical humor column at the paper and I shouldn&#039;t take it seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not trying to be funny or mean, but is Mary Schmich a guy?</p>
<p>That picture on the site looks like a drag queen. It almost led me to believe that this is a satirical humor column at the paper and I shouldn&#8217;t take it seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-143753</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-143753</guid>
		<description>We are free to do as they tell us! We are free to do as they tell us! Please, always tell us what to do Big Brother!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are free to do as they tell us! We are free to do as they tell us! Please, always tell us what to do Big Brother!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-143504</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-143504</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Re: Schmic column - the things that she wants to ban are mainly things that affect other people. There’s a major difference between that and banning things “for your own good”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael,

Everything affects people to one degree or another.  If I go to bed late at night, then over sleep a little bit, then get up and speed on my way to work I&#039;ve decreased your safety on the road.  Hence a national bed time is a must.

And to use one of her own examples,

&lt;blockquote&gt;An enforced ban on honking just because you&#039;re in a hurry. The fine doubles if you honk at someone who is hypermiling. Hypermiling, in case you haven&#039;t caught the craze, is driving that maximizes your mileage, such as coasting toward stop signs.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We should also ban hypermiling since if you coast the person behind you might fail to notice your reduction in speed thus resulting in an accident, increasing traffic congestion, needless waste of resources, and possible injury and lost productivity too.

See, we can do this with just about everything and anything.  Your dividing line is so blurry as to be non-existent, at least without much more work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Re: Schmic column &#8211; the things that she wants to ban are mainly things that affect other people. There’s a major difference between that and banning things “for your own good”.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Everything affects people to one degree or another.  If I go to bed late at night, then over sleep a little bit, then get up and speed on my way to work I&#8217;ve decreased your safety on the road.  Hence a national bed time is a must.</p>
<p>And to use one of her own examples,</p>
<blockquote><p>An enforced ban on honking just because you&#8217;re in a hurry. The fine doubles if you honk at someone who is hypermiling. Hypermiling, in case you haven&#8217;t caught the craze, is driving that maximizes your mileage, such as coasting toward stop signs.
</p></blockquote>
<p>We should also ban hypermiling since if you coast the person behind you might fail to notice your reduction in speed thus resulting in an accident, increasing traffic congestion, needless waste of resources, and possible injury and lost productivity too.</p>
<p>See, we can do this with just about everything and anything.  Your dividing line is so blurry as to be non-existent, at least without much more work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-143080</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 04:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-143080</guid>
		<description>#23 - Don&#039;t be ridiculous. Of the real laws she mentions 5 are entirely about control of private actions (foie gras, trans fats, taxes on bottled water, alcohol, and cigarettes), one (police cameras) is simply a revenue generator, and the other 3 (public smoking, handguns, and cell phone driving) are only (possibly) tangentially related to actually preventing harm to others.

I won&#039;t even get into her fantasy laws...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#23 &#8211; Don&#8217;t be ridiculous. Of the real laws she mentions 5 are entirely about control of private actions (foie gras, trans fats, taxes on bottled water, alcohol, and cigarettes), one (police cameras) is simply a revenue generator, and the other 3 (public smoking, handguns, and cell phone driving) are only (possibly) tangentially related to actually preventing harm to others.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t even get into her fantasy laws&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-143070</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 04:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-143070</guid>
		<description>#22 - What does the Exxon decision have to do with it? Half a billion in damages and half a billion punitive ain&#039;t exactly chump change, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#22 &#8211; What does the Exxon decision have to do with it? Half a billion in damages and half a billion punitive ain&#8217;t exactly chump change, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Maker</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-143054</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Maker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 04:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-143054</guid>
		<description>Two notes on the profane band names:

1) Sirius Satellite Radio plays Holy F&amp;*k all the time and their name pops up on my screen unedited. And the song they play on there is pretty good. 

2) They left out the most offensive of all: Anal C***</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two notes on the profane band names:</p>
<p>1) Sirius Satellite Radio plays Holy F&amp;*k all the time and their name pops up on my screen unedited. And the song they play on there is pretty good. </p>
<p>2) They left out the most offensive of all: Anal C***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-143034</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-143034</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Oh… there was “no intent” and “whatever legal term belief they were in the right place (even though the necessary court order is missing right now) — Prosecutor so Field Asset Services is in the clear.&lt;/i&gt;

If the prosecutor went after FAS, it might be harder to avoid going after cops who break into people&#039;s homes without having what they can reasonably believe to be valid warrants.

JP Morgan and FAS conspired to break into the family&#039;s home and take property from it.  If a judge&#039;s order was required to conduct such a break-in legally, any participant who cannot demonstrate having seen such order cannot have have had a reasonable belief that their action was legal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oh… there was “no intent” and “whatever legal term belief they were in the right place (even though the necessary court order is missing right now) — Prosecutor so Field Asset Services is in the clear.</i></p>
<p>If the prosecutor went after FAS, it might be harder to avoid going after cops who break into people&#8217;s homes without having what they can reasonably believe to be valid warrants.</p>
<p>JP Morgan and FAS conspired to break into the family&#8217;s home and take property from it.  If a judge&#8217;s order was required to conduct such a break-in legally, any participant who cannot demonstrate having seen such order cannot have have had a reasonable belief that their action was legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-143024</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-143024</guid>
		<description>Re: Schmic column - the things that she wants to ban are mainly things that affect other people.  There&#039;s a major difference between that and banning things &quot;for your own good&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Schmic column &#8211; the things that she wants to ban are mainly things that affect other people.  There&#8217;s a major difference between that and banning things &#8220;for your own good&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: central texas</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142914</link>
		<dc:creator>central texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142914</guid>
		<description>Re: Field Asset &quot;services&quot;.

Bear in mind that the lawsuits you suggest would be one of those &quot;nuisance suits&quot; (anyone suing a corporation for anything) that Texas Republicans have tried for years to destroy.  In light of the recent move by the Supreme&#039;s re: Exxon, I would not be surprised to find that the family has the burden of proof to described every article and effectively gets used good prices and a good riddance from the bank&#039;s lawyers.  Otherwise they get tied up in court for a decade or so.  Their chances in Williamson Co. are not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Field Asset &#8220;services&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bear in mind that the lawsuits you suggest would be one of those &#8220;nuisance suits&#8221; (anyone suing a corporation for anything) that Texas Republicans have tried for years to destroy.  In light of the recent move by the Supreme&#8217;s re: Exxon, I would not be surprised to find that the family has the burden of proof to described every article and effectively gets used good prices and a good riddance from the bank&#8217;s lawyers.  Otherwise they get tied up in court for a decade or so.  Their chances in Williamson Co. are not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeL</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142897</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142897</guid>
		<description>A note to the libertarian running this site: thanks so much for having a karma voting system - I can just vote down stupid comments, and am thus spared the temptation of feeding the trolls.  Also, thanks for giving a level playing field to both sides.  Simple public condemnation is more effective than censorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A note to the libertarian running this site: thanks so much for having a karma voting system &#8211; I can just vote down stupid comments, and am thus spared the temptation of feeding the trolls.  Also, thanks for giving a level playing field to both sides.  Simple public condemnation is more effective than censorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142889</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142889</guid>
		<description>That article in the trib is just mind-blowing.  I agree with other commenters that its substance indicates it&#039;s a parody, but the tone is just not quite there.  What&#039;s really creepy is that she justifies the law against running one&#039;s A/C because people should enjoy fresh air and sweating a little.  Got that? Not because it helps anyone ELSE around you in any even insignificant, indirect way, and not even because it is good for your health according to some sort of questionable medical study, but because you should just enjoy certain things, and if you don&#039;t, the law should force you to.  

In the end, I think she&#039;s using a little parody but still to make her ostenisble general point.  These are things she really wouldn&#039;t like to see as actual laws but she uses them to illustrate how rude and obnoxious some people can be in a big city, and so maybe it would be worse without a nice amount of structure.  So while perhaps not an actual fascist, she is still a raging moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That article in the trib is just mind-blowing.  I agree with other commenters that its substance indicates it&#8217;s a parody, but the tone is just not quite there.  What&#8217;s really creepy is that she justifies the law against running one&#8217;s A/C because people should enjoy fresh air and sweating a little.  Got that? Not because it helps anyone ELSE around you in any even insignificant, indirect way, and not even because it is good for your health according to some sort of questionable medical study, but because you should just enjoy certain things, and if you don&#8217;t, the law should force you to.  </p>
<p>In the end, I think she&#8217;s using a little parody but still to make her ostenisble general point.  These are things she really wouldn&#8217;t like to see as actual laws but she uses them to illustrate how rude and obnoxious some people can be in a big city, and so maybe it would be worse without a nice amount of structure.  So while perhaps not an actual fascist, she is still a raging moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GUU</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142861</link>
		<dc:creator>GUU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142861</guid>
		<description>Here is my response on the Tribune website to the &quot;nanny state response piece&quot;:  

Mary (sorry, Ma&#039;am), 

You are too modest!  Clearly you have some (well, I bet it is more than &quot;some&quot;) great ideas about how other people should live their lives.  I think it is just great that you wish to force your preferences on others via legislative fiat--democracy (or fascism?) in action!  

Keep it up mein fuhrer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my response on the Tribune website to the &#8220;nanny state response piece&#8221;:  </p>
<p>Mary (sorry, Ma&#8217;am), </p>
<p>You are too modest!  Clearly you have some (well, I bet it is more than &#8220;some&#8221;) great ideas about how other people should live their lives.  I think it is just great that you wish to force your preferences on others via legislative fiat&#8211;democracy (or fascism?) in action!  </p>
<p>Keep it up mein fuhrer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: witless chum</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142846</link>
		<dc:creator>witless chum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142846</guid>
		<description>How does Slate not mention Anal Cunt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Slate not mention Anal Cunt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142843</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142843</guid>
		<description>#16 - They are required to hold it in storage, for at least 24 hours. They&#039;re also required to get a court order and inform that owners that they&#039;ve taken their crap. None of that happened in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#16 &#8211; They are required to hold it in storage, for at least 24 hours. They&#8217;re also required to get a court order and inform that owners that they&#8217;ve taken their crap. None of that happened in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142768</link>
		<dc:creator>Against Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142768</guid>
		<description>Edmund,

I didn&#039;t mean to imply JP Morgan had no liability and I agree with you about criminal liability, that was just a little hyperbole. There should be very severe civil liability for both parties and punitive damages should be imposed so this kind of &quot;mix-up&quot; doesn&#039;t happen again.

It sounds like they lost everything, pictures, family heirlooms, things that can&#039;t be replaced. These companies should be required to hold these assets in storage for some minimal period so the owners have the opportunity to reclaim their property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edmund,</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t mean to imply JP Morgan had no liability and I agree with you about criminal liability, that was just a little hyperbole. There should be very severe civil liability for both parties and punitive damages should be imposed so this kind of &#8220;mix-up&#8221; doesn&#8217;t happen again.</p>
<p>It sounds like they lost everything, pictures, family heirlooms, things that can&#8217;t be replaced. These companies should be required to hold these assets in storage for some minimal period so the owners have the opportunity to reclaim their property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142767</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142767</guid>
		<description>JP Morgan just did a no-knock raid!  Don&#039;t check the info, break in, steal things, etc.  Only thing they missed was to shoot (and possibly kill) someone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP Morgan just did a no-knock raid!  Don&#8217;t check the info, break in, steal things, etc.  Only thing they missed was to shoot (and possibly kill) someone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142766</link>
		<dc:creator>Against Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142766</guid>
		<description>Its just plain amazes me how &quot;educated people&quot; like  E. J. Dionne Jr. do not understand the purpose of the Supreme Court. I shouldn&#039;t be surprised though it appears that even some of the Justices don&#039;t fully understand their purpose.

I guess civics isn&#039;t really taught in school anymore, at least not the significance of a constitutional republic as apposed to a democracy. The ignorance of the masses in this country will our downfall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its just plain amazes me how &#8220;educated people&#8221; like  E. J. Dionne Jr. do not understand the purpose of the Supreme Court. I shouldn&#8217;t be surprised though it appears that even some of the Justices don&#8217;t fully understand their purpose.</p>
<p>I guess civics isn&#8217;t really taught in school anymore, at least not the significance of a constitutional republic as apposed to a democracy. The ignorance of the masses in this country will our downfall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/02/lunch-links-19/comment-page-1/#comment-142765</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10227#comment-142765</guid>
		<description>Regarding Mary and her upbringing, did she have to goose-step to school too?  Jesus, what a busy body.  Her nose must be constantly stuck in the blinds checking out what her neighbors are up too.  Are they using to many napkins, is that lighter-fluid they are using on their charcoal?  Does she monitor her neighbors electricity meter to make sure their AC unit is up to par?  Oh wait...she doesn&#039;t want to do it, she wants to hire a small army of government pests to do it.  I&#039;m tempted to conclude her article is an attempt at parody...but I just can&#039;t quite get there.

If I was her neighbor I&#039;d do everything that annoys here.  Hell I&#039;d go out and buy heavy equipment just to turn it on and annoy her.  I&#039;d go over to her house/apartment and wave a fistful of napkins in her face then burn them with copious amounts of lighter fluid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Mary and her upbringing, did she have to goose-step to school too?  Jesus, what a busy body.  Her nose must be constantly stuck in the blinds checking out what her neighbors are up too.  Are they using to many napkins, is that lighter-fluid they are using on their charcoal?  Does she monitor her neighbors electricity meter to make sure their AC unit is up to par?  Oh wait&#8230;she doesn&#8217;t want to do it, she wants to hire a small army of government pests to do it.  I&#8217;m tempted to conclude her article is an attempt at parody&#8230;but I just can&#8217;t quite get there.</p>
<p>If I was her neighbor I&#8217;d do everything that annoys here.  Hell I&#8217;d go out and buy heavy equipment just to turn it on and annoy her.  I&#8217;d go over to her house/apartment and wave a fistful of napkins in her face then burn them with copious amounts of lighter fluid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

