<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sanford Vivifies a Vigorous Veto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/15/sanford-vivifies-a-vigorous-veto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/15/sanford-vivifies-a-vigorous-veto/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Straw Men : links for 2008-05-18</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/15/sanford-vivifies-a-vigorous-veto/comment-page-1/#comment-113010</link>
		<dc:creator>No Straw Men : links for 2008-05-18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 08:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9989#comment-113010</guid>
		<description>[...] Sanford Vivifies a Vigorous Veto - Radley Balko, Agitator With the stroke of his pen, though, the governor, who served three terms in Congress and oversees a state of 4 million heads, did away with a requirement that a person must complete 1,500 hours of instruction to shampoo hair in a salon. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sanford Vivifies a Vigorous Veto &#8211; Radley Balko, Agitator With the stroke of his pen, though, the governor, who served three terms in Congress and oversees a state of 4 million heads, did away with a requirement that a person must complete 1,500 hours of instruction to shampoo hair in a salon. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MP</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/15/sanford-vivifies-a-vigorous-veto/comment-page-1/#comment-112070</link>
		<dc:creator>MP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9989#comment-112070</guid>
		<description>Veto?  What veto?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veto?  What veto?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank N</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/15/sanford-vivifies-a-vigorous-veto/comment-page-1/#comment-111935</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9989#comment-111935</guid>
		<description>Comment?

s on Radley&#039;s site?

Remember the gold ol’ days, when most liberatarians talked like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment?</p>
<p>s on Radley&#8217;s site?</p>
<p>Remember the gold ol’ days, when most liberatarians talked like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBCraig</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/15/sanford-vivifies-a-vigorous-veto/comment-page-1/#comment-111741</link>
		<dc:creator>KBCraig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9989#comment-111741</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather he was No.2 on the Ron Paul ticket. 

What, I can dream, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather he was No.2 on the Ron Paul ticket. </p>
<p>What, I can dream, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/15/sanford-vivifies-a-vigorous-veto/comment-page-1/#comment-111722</link>
		<dc:creator>Against Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9989#comment-111722</guid>
		<description>Dave I think Radley was refering to the Good Old Days before we were born.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave I think Radley was refering to the Good Old Days before we were born.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/15/sanford-vivifies-a-vigorous-veto/comment-page-1/#comment-111602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9989#comment-111602</guid>
		<description>&quot;Remember the gold ol’ days, when most Republicans talked like this?&quot;

Ummm...  Nope.  That&#039;s your memory playing tricks on you.  Like remembering only the good stuff about college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Remember the gold ol’ days, when most Republicans talked like this?&#8221;</p>
<p>Ummm&#8230;  Nope.  That&#8217;s your memory playing tricks on you.  Like remembering only the good stuff about college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James D</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/15/sanford-vivifies-a-vigorous-veto/comment-page-1/#comment-111582</link>
		<dc:creator>James D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9989#comment-111582</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s supposedly on McCain&#039;s &#039;short list&#039; of VP candidates .... would make sense since McCain isn&#039;t very popular with &#039;true&#039; conservatives.  Considering McCain&#039;s age, his VP choice is pretty important actually.

But this election is still the Democrats to lose (and they sure seem to be trying).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s supposedly on McCain&#8217;s &#8216;short list&#8217; of VP candidates &#8230;. would make sense since McCain isn&#8217;t very popular with &#8216;true&#8217; conservatives.  Considering McCain&#8217;s age, his VP choice is pretty important actually.</p>
<p>But this election is still the Democrats to lose (and they sure seem to be trying).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

