<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCTV Not Solving Crimes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bago</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-109516</link>
		<dc:creator>bago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-109516</guid>
		<description>Face it, with infinite storage everything you do will be recorded and analyzed. You should focus on a privacy framework instead of fighting the future. The ads on this page know more about you than you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face it, with infinite storage everything you do will be recorded and analyzed. You should focus on a privacy framework instead of fighting the future. The ads on this page know more about you than you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-109470</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-109470</guid>
		<description>Usually when a government program doesn't work, the answer is to increase the size of the program.  Ultimately, that's probably what will happen with Britain's surveillance camera system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually when a government program doesn&#8217;t work, the answer is to increase the size of the program.  Ultimately, that&#8217;s probably what will happen with Britain&#8217;s surveillance camera system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-109469</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-109469</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#1  Jonathan Hohensee
I still oppose it, and despise the idea that Big Brother can watch whatever I do whenever I do it, but I think what a lot of hysterical kneejerk Orwell quoting types forget is that the government isn’t always good at doing what it does.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As the official spokeman for all hysterical kneejerk Orwell quoting types, I can tell you that not a single one of us feels the government is "good at doing what it does".  The idea that the government might be too inept to use its surveillance as a tool to crack down on though crime, does nothing to bolster our sense of security or make us any less hysterical or kneejerky.  Not being able to do something well has never hindered the government from doing it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#1  Jonathan Hohensee<br />
I still oppose it, and despise the idea that Big Brother can watch whatever I do whenever I do it, but I think what a lot of hysterical kneejerk Orwell quoting types forget is that the government isn’t always good at doing what it does.</p></blockquote>
<p>As the official spokeman for all hysterical kneejerk Orwell quoting types, I can tell you that not a single one of us feels the government is &#8220;good at doing what it does&#8221;.  The idea that the government might be too inept to use its surveillance as a tool to crack down on though crime, does nothing to bolster our sense of security or make us any less hysterical or kneejerky.  Not being able to do something well has never hindered the government from doing it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Rana</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-108689</link>
		<dc:creator>La Rana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-108689</guid>
		<description>I think cameras mark the end of our free society, but I also think you've got the wrong metric here Radley.  The better argument for cameras is that they serve as a deterrent, and I have a sinking feeling in my stomach that they work in that regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think cameras mark the end of our free society, but I also think you&#8217;ve got the wrong metric here Radley.  The better argument for cameras is that they serve as a deterrent, and I have a sinking feeling in my stomach that they work in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-108642</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 13:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-108642</guid>
		<description>They have recently started installing cameras in my town. 

Ostensibly for the usual crime deterrence reasons.

The cameras are on most corners in the downtown now. Three on the block in front of the newspaper office. It seems that last year there was a person who shot at the paper building. The person was never caught. The potential is that it was an off duty police officer angered by a story.

So in our town CCTV is as much a Catch the Cop TV system as anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have recently started installing cameras in my town. </p>
<p>Ostensibly for the usual crime deterrence reasons.</p>
<p>The cameras are on most corners in the downtown now. Three on the block in front of the newspaper office. It seems that last year there was a person who shot at the paper building. The person was never caught. The potential is that it was an off duty police officer angered by a story.</p>
<p>So in our town CCTV is as much a Catch the Cop TV system as anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymi</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-108372</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 04:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-108372</guid>
		<description>Human ingenuity in the face of such crap can be amazing. Read &lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/1938076/The-Get-Out-Clause%2C-Manchester%27s-stars-of-CCTV-cameras.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this article from the telegraph&lt;/a&gt; about this band which used CCTVs around London, to make a music video. 

Here is the &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98u1HuqS7Nk" rel="nofollow"&gt; video on youtube.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human ingenuity in the face of such crap can be amazing. Read <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/1938076/The-Get-Out-Clause%2C-Manchester%27s-stars-of-CCTV-cameras.html" rel="nofollow">this article from the telegraph</a> about this band which used CCTVs around London, to make a music video. </p>
<p>Here is the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98u1HuqS7Nk" rel="nofollow"> video on youtube.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-108131</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-108131</guid>
		<description>//How can Big Brother crack down on thought crimes if using CCTV really isn’t effective on stopping robberies?//

CCTV would be much more effective for the former than the latter.  If the government suspects Winston Smith may be up to some ungoodness, it can track him to see where he goes, and who he spends how much time with.  It can track the people with whom he seems to have overly conversant, and see who they meet.

CCTV is not that great at solving crimes, because most crimes don't start out with any 'hot leads', and CCTV isn't very good at catching 'cold ones'.  On the other hand, if the objective is to track down anyone who might question the government, and if the government has any suspicions to start with, CCTV can be effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>//How can Big Brother crack down on thought crimes if using CCTV really isn’t effective on stopping robberies?//</p>
<p>CCTV would be much more effective for the former than the latter.  If the government suspects Winston Smith may be up to some ungoodness, it can track him to see where he goes, and who he spends how much time with.  It can track the people with whom he seems to have overly conversant, and see who they meet.</p>
<p>CCTV is not that great at solving crimes, because most crimes don&#8217;t start out with any &#8216;hot leads&#8217;, and CCTV isn&#8217;t very good at catching &#8216;cold ones&#8217;.  On the other hand, if the objective is to track down anyone who might question the government, and if the government has any suspicions to start with, CCTV can be effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-108101</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-108101</guid>
		<description>alan moore was right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alan moore was right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packratt</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-108096</link>
		<dc:creator>Packratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-108096</guid>
		<description>UCrawford,

Unfortunately, even when CCTV cameras are placed in public places, how can you guarantee that the lens will stay trained on that public place?

Evidently... You can't.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/06/cctv_peeping_toms/

...after all, while the watchers watch us, who watches them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UCrawford,</p>
<p>Unfortunately, even when CCTV cameras are placed in public places, how can you guarantee that the lens will stay trained on that public place?</p>
<p>Evidently&#8230; You can&#8217;t.<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/06/cctv_peeping_toms/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/06/cctv_peeping_toms/</a></p>
<p>&#8230;after all, while the watchers watch us, who watches them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UCrawford</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-108077</link>
		<dc:creator>UCrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-108077</guid>
		<description>In the town I lived in, CCTV helped the police catch and convict two serial rapists.  I get why people don't like the cameras, but so long as they're only used in public areas and not on private property against the owners' will I've really got no problem with them.  I don't see it as much different than hiring more police officers, except the camera's not going to beat the crap out of you because it has a bad day and a personality disorder.

That said, I hope like hell that speed cameras stay a rarity over here.  Absolutely hate those things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the town I lived in, CCTV helped the police catch and convict two serial rapists.  I get why people don&#8217;t like the cameras, but so long as they&#8217;re only used in public areas and not on private property against the owners&#8217; will I&#8217;ve really got no problem with them.  I don&#8217;t see it as much different than hiring more police officers, except the camera&#8217;s not going to beat the crap out of you because it has a bad day and a personality disorder.</p>
<p>That said, I hope like hell that speed cameras stay a rarity over here.  Absolutely hate those things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OGRE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-108043</link>
		<dc:creator>OGRE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 18:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-108043</guid>
		<description>pounds of euros

oh, and as if it were ever about solving crimes.  lol thats funny...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pounds of euros</p>
<p>oh, and as if it were ever about solving crimes.  lol thats funny&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hohensee</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/10/cctv-not-solving-crimes/#comment-108008</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hohensee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=9961#comment-108008</guid>
		<description>Although I oppose them still, this news kinds of takes the fire out of the "oppressive police state" argument against video surveillance.  How can Big Brother crack down on thought crimes if using CCTV really isn't effective on stopping robberies?
I still oppose it, and despise the idea that Big Brother can watch whatever I do whenever I do it, but I think what a lot of hysterical kneejerk Orwell quoting types forget is that the government isn't always good at doing what it does. 

&lt;i&gt;despite billions of pounds spent on the new technology&lt;/i&gt;
Pounds of what?
&lt;i&gt;badumdum&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I oppose them still, this news kinds of takes the fire out of the &#8220;oppressive police state&#8221; argument against video surveillance.  How can Big Brother crack down on thought crimes if using CCTV really isn&#8217;t effective on stopping robberies?<br />
I still oppose it, and despise the idea that Big Brother can watch whatever I do whenever I do it, but I think what a lot of hysterical kneejerk Orwell quoting types forget is that the government isn&#8217;t always good at doing what it does. </p>
<p><i>despite billions of pounds spent on the new technology</i><br />
Pounds of what?<br />
<i>badumdum</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
