<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;Non-Lethal&#8221; Taser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 04:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LglRN</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-106482</link>
		<dc:creator>LglRN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-106482</guid>
		<description>The likelihood of dying from having been 'Tased' is less than the likelihood of dying in a or from an auto accident.  We pretty much only hear of deaths from Tasers in the news, not about the thousands who have been Tased and who did not die.  In an emergent situation where prevention of harm to others by an out-of-control or order-ignoring subject is necessary, then would you rather the subject be shot to death or subdued with a Taser?   

Bottom line, when the police say STOP, then stop.  I think it would be better to be Tased and live than receive a bullet, for not listening to the police or other authorities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The likelihood of dying from having been &#8216;Tased&#8217; is less than the likelihood of dying in a or from an auto accident.  We pretty much only hear of deaths from Tasers in the news, not about the thousands who have been Tased and who did not die.  In an emergent situation where prevention of harm to others by an out-of-control or order-ignoring subject is necessary, then would you rather the subject be shot to death or subdued with a Taser?   </p>
<p>Bottom line, when the police say STOP, then stop.  I think it would be better to be Tased and live than receive a bullet, for not listening to the police or other authorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-105595</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-105595</guid>
		<description>I just heard an advertisement on the radio for a local gun store that is pushing tasers as a great Mother's Day gift.   I just thought I'd mention that for all you people who think I only say bad things about Alabama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just heard an advertisement on the radio for a local gun store that is pushing tasers as a great Mother&#8217;s Day gift.   I just thought I&#8217;d mention that for all you people who think I only say bad things about Alabama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-104910</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 04:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-104910</guid>
		<description>Well if one of the tools in your toolbox is consistently referenced as non-lethal and safe its use will escalate. The 'non-lethality' of the device is in question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if one of the tools in your toolbox is consistently referenced as non-lethal and safe its use will escalate. The &#8216;non-lethality&#8217; of the device is in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dagamore</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-103195</link>
		<dc:creator>dagamore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 06:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-103195</guid>
		<description>Tasers are just one of the many tools that cops should have at there disposal to ensure the safety of them and others.  Tasers are very rarely used, and when they are used, they very rarely cause any sort of lasting harm, and very rarely cause death.  But if you take away the less-than lethal tools from the police, and you leave them only with lethal tools, they will use them more.  It has been shown that if you remove "compliancy holds," "joint locks," "chemical compliance devices," and finally "electrical compliance devices (aka Tasers)." The death and injury rate for both the police and the public go up.

If the only tool in your toolbox is a hammer, then all your problems look like nails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tasers are just one of the many tools that cops should have at there disposal to ensure the safety of them and others.  Tasers are very rarely used, and when they are used, they very rarely cause any sort of lasting harm, and very rarely cause death.  But if you take away the less-than lethal tools from the police, and you leave them only with lethal tools, they will use them more.  It has been shown that if you remove &#8220;compliancy holds,&#8221; &#8220;joint locks,&#8221; &#8220;chemical compliance devices,&#8221; and finally &#8220;electrical compliance devices (aka Tasers).&#8221; The death and injury rate for both the police and the public go up.</p>
<p>If the only tool in your toolbox is a hammer, then all your problems look like nails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nando</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-102248</link>
		<dc:creator>Nando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-102248</guid>
		<description>I can't wait until someone starts using the word "Taser" to refer to any of the brands, not just the Taser brand.  I believe the term has been used so much that the brand can no longer hold the trademark of the word "Taser" due to common usage.  This happened to aspirin, cellophane, elevator, and thermos, and I really hope it happens to Taser!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait until someone starts using the word &#8220;Taser&#8221; to refer to any of the brands, not just the Taser brand.  I believe the term has been used so much that the brand can no longer hold the trademark of the word &#8220;Taser&#8221; due to common usage.  This happened to aspirin, cellophane, elevator, and thermos, and I really hope it happens to Taser!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-102189</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-102189</guid>
		<description>Nick - thanks, I wasn't aware that this had happened.  

So, the officers pass physical exams, undergo rigorous physical training, and agility tests, yet they have some "undisclosed" condition that suddenly decides to rear its deadly head when they get tasered?

Has anybody studied the number of officers who die during taser training vs the number with "undisclosed" conditions who just drop dead after a chase of physical confrontation with a suspect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick - thanks, I wasn&#8217;t aware that this had happened.  </p>
<p>So, the officers pass physical exams, undergo rigorous physical training, and agility tests, yet they have some &#8220;undisclosed&#8221; condition that suddenly decides to rear its deadly head when they get tasered?</p>
<p>Has anybody studied the number of officers who die during taser training vs the number with &#8220;undisclosed&#8221; conditions who just drop dead after a chase of physical confrontation with a suspect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: witless chum</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-101586</link>
		<dc:creator>witless chum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-101586</guid>
		<description>I've heard of police using tasers in the perfect situation for it, (cops roll up to house as man is chasing girlfriend across the front yard with a knife, they taser him, rather than shooting him) and in less so (man won't submit to being handcuffed after he's found guilty of a crime and has bond revoked). 

Interestingly, the guy chasing his girlfriend got to plead no contest rather than guilty in his plea bargain, because the judge accepted that a combination of drunkeness and being tased made his memory rather hazy as to what had happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard of police using tasers in the perfect situation for it, (cops roll up to house as man is chasing girlfriend across the front yard with a knife, they taser him, rather than shooting him) and in less so (man won&#8217;t submit to being handcuffed after he&#8217;s found guilty of a crime and has bond revoked). </p>
<p>Interestingly, the guy chasing his girlfriend got to plead no contest rather than guilty in his plea bargain, because the judge accepted that a combination of drunkeness and being tased made his memory rather hazy as to what had happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-100466</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-100466</guid>
		<description>We may see a whole lot of examples on May 7 in NYC.

I'm already seeing police discussion groups wishing for a youtube video of Al Sharpton on a TASER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We may see a whole lot of examples on May 7 in NYC.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m already seeing police discussion groups wishing for a youtube video of Al Sharpton on a TASER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahcuah</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99915</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahcuah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 18:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99915</guid>
		<description>On a related note, a &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/5yx9je" rel="nofollow"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt; in today's Columbus Dispatch:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Cut stun-gun references from autopsies, judge says
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
AKRON (AP) -- A medical examiner must change her autopsy findings to delete any reference that stun guns contributed to the deaths of three people, a judge ruled.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
Friday's decision was a victory for Taser International, which had challenged rulings by Summit County Medical Examiner Lisa Kohler, including a case in which five deputy sheriffs are charged in the death of a jail inmate who was restrained by the wrists and ankles and hit with pepper spray and a stun gun.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
Kohler ruled that the 2006 death of Mark McCullaugh Jr., 28, was a homicide and that he died from asphyxiation because of the "combined effects of chemical, mechanical and electrical restraint."
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
Visiting Judge Ted Schneiderman said in his ruling that there was no expert evidence to indicate that Taser devices impaired McCullaugh's respiration. "More likely, the death was due to a fatal cardiac arrhythmia brought on by severe heart disease," the judge wrote.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
Schneiderman ordered Kohler to rule McCullaugh's death undetermined and to delete any references to homicide.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So here we have a competent medical examiner, and the judge goes against it (as opposed to the Mississippi situation).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a related note, a <a href="http://tinyurl.com/5yx9je" rel="nofollow">story</a> in today&#8217;s Columbus Dispatch:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Cut stun-gun references from autopsies, judge says
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
AKRON (AP) &#8212; A medical examiner must change her autopsy findings to delete any reference that stun guns contributed to the deaths of three people, a judge ruled.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
Friday&#8217;s decision was a victory for Taser International, which had challenged rulings by Summit County Medical Examiner Lisa Kohler, including a case in which five deputy sheriffs are charged in the death of a jail inmate who was restrained by the wrists and ankles and hit with pepper spray and a stun gun.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
Kohler ruled that the 2006 death of Mark McCullaugh Jr., 28, was a homicide and that he died from asphyxiation because of the &#8220;combined effects of chemical, mechanical and electrical restraint.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
Visiting Judge Ted Schneiderman said in his ruling that there was no expert evidence to indicate that Taser devices impaired McCullaugh&#8217;s respiration. &#8220;More likely, the death was due to a fatal cardiac arrhythmia brought on by severe heart disease,&#8221; the judge wrote.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
Schneiderman ordered Kohler to rule McCullaugh&#8217;s death undetermined and to delete any references to homicide.
</p></blockquote>
<p>So here we have a competent medical examiner, and the judge goes against it (as opposed to the Mississippi situation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick M.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99792</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 17:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99792</guid>
		<description>Lori,

That has already happened.  Every time, it is because the officer failed to disclose a preexisting condition.  Or, at least the reports say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lori,</p>
<p>That has already happened.  Every time, it is because the officer failed to disclose a preexisting condition.  Or, at least the reports say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99667</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99667</guid>
		<description>I wonder what Taser International will say when, inevitably, a police officer (who may be required to undergo a tasing) dies after being shot with their perfectly safe, non-lethal weapon.  Will they claim that this poor guy some how suffered from excited delirium?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what Taser International will say when, inevitably, a police officer (who may be required to undergo a tasing) dies after being shot with their perfectly safe, non-lethal weapon.  Will they claim that this poor guy some how suffered from excited delirium?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarran</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99272</link>
		<dc:creator>tarran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 12:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99272</guid>
		<description>Just the facts:

From &lt;a href="http://www.taser.org/electrical-specifications.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Taser's website&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;When the output is connected to a 4,000 Ohm load, each individual pulse of 3.5 uS (.0000035 second) in duration and measures 23,600 volts DC peak with a peak current of 5.9 Amps. The DC waveform is ½ sinusoidal. The time-averaged current is .00022 Amps. The maximum average power output of the AIR TASER is 6 Watts.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What matters is not the time average current, but the maximum. The heartbeat is regulated by a series of small electrical timing signals. If sufficient current passes through one of the nodes that controls the contraction and relaxation of the heart, it can fool that node into sending signals out of cycle.  The nodes don't care about the time average of the current passing through them.  Rather they receive some electrical signal, they delay for a time, then they fire sending orders to the heart muscle cells they control, and timing signals to adjacent nodes which are used to initiate those nodes' action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just the facts:</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.taser.org/electrical-specifications.html" rel="nofollow">Taser&#8217;s website</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>When the output is connected to a 4,000 Ohm load, each individual pulse of 3.5 uS (.0000035 second) in duration and measures 23,600 volts DC peak with a peak current of 5.9 Amps. The DC waveform is ½ sinusoidal. The time-averaged current is .00022 Amps. The maximum average power output of the AIR TASER is 6 Watts.</p></blockquote>
<p>What matters is not the time average current, but the maximum. The heartbeat is regulated by a series of small electrical timing signals. If sufficient current passes through one of the nodes that controls the contraction and relaxation of the heart, it can fool that node into sending signals out of cycle.  The nodes don&#8217;t care about the time average of the current passing through them.  Rather they receive some electrical signal, they delay for a time, then they fire sending orders to the heart muscle cells they control, and timing signals to adjacent nodes which are used to initiate those nodes&#8217; action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99109</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 11:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-99109</guid>
		<description>JOR, you're missing the point on that. All of what you say about police force structures and values certainly make them more likely to do things that are bad for the public, but using lethal force is still a rarity which makes significant press coverage (and so which even police forces frown upon, though not to the point of actually disciplining individuals).

Because taser is presented as non-lethal, deaths can be passed off as not being a result of the tasering, and so they know that there's no chance the death will go on their statistics or cause uncomfortable headlines. That inevitably makes them more stun-happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JOR, you&#8217;re missing the point on that. All of what you say about police force structures and values certainly make them more likely to do things that are bad for the public, but using lethal force is still a rarity which makes significant press coverage (and so which even police forces frown upon, though not to the point of actually disciplining individuals).</p>
<p>Because taser is presented as non-lethal, deaths can be passed off as not being a result of the tasering, and so they know that there&#8217;s no chance the death will go on their statistics or cause uncomfortable headlines. That inevitably makes them more stun-happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98684</link>
		<dc:creator>roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98684</guid>
		<description>I agree with various above that Tasers have appropriate uses, but they are often misused.  Tasers don't seem unusual in this respect.  There is a place for guns in policework, but we see police misuse them too.  Ditto pepper spray, clubs (no I will not call it a "baton"), and verbal warnings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with various above that Tasers have appropriate uses, but they are often misused.  Tasers don&#8217;t seem unusual in this respect.  There is a place for guns in policework, but we see police misuse them too.  Ditto pepper spray, clubs (no I will not call it a &#8220;baton&#8221;), and verbal warnings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James D</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98618</link>
		<dc:creator>James D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98618</guid>
		<description>I commend your checks on the safety of the Taser, but it should be noted that the AZ Republic has been known to have a huge bias and REALLY screw up (sometimes MAKE UP) facts to push a story.  When called on it, they put a tiny retraction in a back page (if at all).  Just saying.

It would be nice to have a "fire and forget" weapon, but this doesn't seem to be it.  It does still seem better than a bullet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I commend your checks on the safety of the Taser, but it should be noted that the AZ Republic has been known to have a huge bias and REALLY screw up (sometimes MAKE UP) facts to push a story.  When called on it, they put a tiny retraction in a back page (if at all).  Just saying.</p>
<p>It would be nice to have a &#8220;fire and forget&#8221; weapon, but this doesn&#8217;t seem to be it.  It does still seem better than a bullet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just_the_Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98602</link>
		<dc:creator>Just_the_Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98602</guid>
		<description>"In any case, it seems clear that in certain conditions a frontal tasering could cause v.fib cardiac arrest especially when the heart is stressed with catecholamines (e.g. adrenaline) or stimulants (cocaine, amphetamines)."

Cleveland Clinic Study Reveaaled that Cocaine increased the margin of safety for ventricular fibrillation.

Effects of Cocaine Intoxication on the Threshold for Stun Gun Induction of Ventricular Fibrillation 

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess cocaine's effects on Taser-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) threshold in a pig model. 

BACKGROUND: Stun guns are increasingly used by law enforcement officials to restrain violent subjects, who are frequently intoxicated with cocaine and other drugs of abuse. The interaction of cocaine and the stun gun on VF induction is unknown. 

METHODS: We tested five adult pigs using a custom device built to deliver multiples of standard neuromuscular incapacitating (NMI) discharge that matched the waveform of a commercially available electrical stun gun (Taser X-26, Taser International, Scottsdale, Arizona). The NMI discharges were applied in a step-up and step-down fashion at 5 body locations. End points included determination of maximum safe multiple, minimum VF-inducing multiple, and ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) before and after cocaine infusion. 

RESULTS: Standard NMI discharges (x1) did not cause VF at any of the 5 locations before or after cocaine infusion. The maximum safe multiple, minimum VF-inducing multiple, and VFT of NMI application increased with increasing electrode distance from the heart. There was a 1.5- to 2-fold increase in these values at each position after cocaine infusion, suggesting decreased cardiac vulnerability for VF. Cocaine increased the required strength of NMI discharge that caused 2:1 or 3:1 ventricular capture ratios at all of the positions. No significant changes in creatine kinase-MB and troponin-I were seen. 

CONCLUSIONS: Cocaine increased the VFT of NMI discharges at all dart locations tested and reduced cardiac vulnerability to VF. The application of cocaine increased the safety margin by 50% to 100% above the baseline safety margin. 

http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/abstract/j.jacc.2006.03.055v1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In any case, it seems clear that in certain conditions a frontal tasering could cause v.fib cardiac arrest especially when the heart is stressed with catecholamines (e.g. adrenaline) or stimulants (cocaine, amphetamines).&#8221;</p>
<p>Cleveland Clinic Study Reveaaled that Cocaine increased the margin of safety for ventricular fibrillation.</p>
<p>Effects of Cocaine Intoxication on the Threshold for Stun Gun Induction of Ventricular Fibrillation </p>
<p>OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess cocaine&#8217;s effects on Taser-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) threshold in a pig model. </p>
<p>BACKGROUND: Stun guns are increasingly used by law enforcement officials to restrain violent subjects, who are frequently intoxicated with cocaine and other drugs of abuse. The interaction of cocaine and the stun gun on VF induction is unknown. </p>
<p>METHODS: We tested five adult pigs using a custom device built to deliver multiples of standard neuromuscular incapacitating (NMI) discharge that matched the waveform of a commercially available electrical stun gun (Taser X-26, Taser International, Scottsdale, Arizona). The NMI discharges were applied in a step-up and step-down fashion at 5 body locations. End points included determination of maximum safe multiple, minimum VF-inducing multiple, and ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) before and after cocaine infusion. </p>
<p>RESULTS: Standard NMI discharges (x1) did not cause VF at any of the 5 locations before or after cocaine infusion. The maximum safe multiple, minimum VF-inducing multiple, and VFT of NMI application increased with increasing electrode distance from the heart. There was a 1.5- to 2-fold increase in these values at each position after cocaine infusion, suggesting decreased cardiac vulnerability for VF. Cocaine increased the required strength of NMI discharge that caused 2:1 or 3:1 ventricular capture ratios at all of the positions. No significant changes in creatine kinase-MB and troponin-I were seen. </p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Cocaine increased the VFT of NMI discharges at all dart locations tested and reduced cardiac vulnerability to VF. The application of cocaine increased the safety margin by 50% to 100% above the baseline safety margin. </p>
<p><a href="http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/abstract/j.jacc.2006.03.055v1" rel="nofollow">http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/abstract/j.jacc.2006.03.055v1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just_the_Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98593</link>
		<dc:creator>Just_the_Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98593</guid>
		<description>Tarran writes

"The taser produces a short pulse of 6 Amps. A current of .6 Amps can cause the heart to fibrilate or otherwise disturb the electrical function of the heart"

Tasers use only 0.0021 amperes of current.  Your estimate is 2857 higher than the actual figure.  So much for your credibility.

Tarran further writes

"I am stunned that the officers of Taser would make such a unreasonable claim. The science contradicts them, and all they will accomplish is to gain a reputation for dishonesty."

Fiction is often thousand times more stunning than fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tarran writes</p>
<p>&#8220;The taser produces a short pulse of 6 Amps. A current of .6 Amps can cause the heart to fibrilate or otherwise disturb the electrical function of the heart&#8221;</p>
<p>Tasers use only 0.0021 amperes of current.  Your estimate is 2857 higher than the actual figure.  So much for your credibility.</p>
<p>Tarran further writes</p>
<p>&#8220;I am stunned that the officers of Taser would make such a unreasonable claim. The science contradicts them, and all they will accomplish is to gain a reputation for dishonesty.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fiction is often thousand times more stunning than fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Excited-Delirium.com</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98492</link>
		<dc:creator>Excited-Delirium.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98492</guid>
		<description>There are some really good comments above. It's nice to see a series of comments that are pretty much balanced and no mindless Taser spokespuppets. If you are interested in the taser issue, please visit my blog www.Excited-Delirium.com (no, it's not pro-taser).

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some really good comments above. It&#8217;s nice to see a series of comments that are pretty much balanced and no mindless Taser spokespuppets. If you are interested in the taser issue, please visit my blog <a href="http://www.Excited-Delirium.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Excited-Delirium.com</a> (no, it&#8217;s not pro-taser).</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOR</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98486</link>
		<dc:creator>JOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98486</guid>
		<description>“But the incessant “non-lethal” marketing of the weapon I think makes the police much more willing to use it…”

I think it’s the bully-values of corruption, entitlement, and tribalism endemic to police culture that makes them willing to use it, not the fact that it is pushed as a ‘non-lethal’ weapon.

I mean, to think that was the case, you’d  almost have to think that they have something against killing people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“But the incessant “non-lethal” marketing of the weapon I think makes the police much more willing to use it…”</p>
<p>I think it’s the bully-values of corruption, entitlement, and tribalism endemic to police culture that makes them willing to use it, not the fact that it is pushed as a ‘non-lethal’ weapon.</p>
<p>I mean, to think that was the case, you’d  almost have to think that they have something against killing people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98440</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/05/03/the-non-lethal-taser/#comment-98440</guid>
		<description>If you thinks Taser is OK, please feel free to volunteer yourself to be shot by one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you thinks Taser is OK, please feel free to volunteer yourself to be shot by one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
