<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is This Offensive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:44:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lou Perryman</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-102177</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Perryman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-102177</guid>
		<description>Wow. Radley, I can sympathize if you are wondering about your readers.

I might not be very offended by this display if the one next to it contained figurines depicting some redneck with his pants down in an outhouse, with a gun, with few teeth, with a bottle of corn liquor beside him, with a misspelled sign on it, fucking his daughter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Radley, I can sympathize if you are wondering about your readers.</p>
<p>I might not be very offended by this display if the one next to it contained figurines depicting some redneck with his pants down in an outhouse, with a gun, with few teeth, with a bottle of corn liquor beside him, with a misspelled sign on it, fucking his daughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85991</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85991</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t believe this is still going, and, naturally, I got thoughts

1) re: thorn.    I&#039;ve never seen a Klan rally either.  Interestingly, the two Pat &quot;saw&quot; consisted of every Klan member in the nation according to the SPLC.  I thought that would have been newsworthy or something.

2) Robert, you said that you are not personally offended by these.  You said that these are offensive to black Americans because of the stereotypes.  Yet, one commenter after another has testified that &quot;Black Americana&quot; is mostly purchased by blacks.   And now you have the nerve to say that someone else is playing gatekeeper to what is offensive.

3) The assumption that racist white people would buy these is laughable.  I&#039;ve know many racists in my life, and none of them liked black people.  Fittingly, none of them had any sort of black memorabilia in their house.  Kinda makes sense when you think about it.

4) Padreag is apparently mixed-raced and offended by these which he/she has every right to be.  The issue, though, isn&#039;t whether they&#039;re offensive in a vacuum (which they obviously are), but if the market is among non-racists who purchase them for historical reasons.  I think the latter is clearly what&#039;s going on here.

5) The disturbing part of this is that people act like they want this to be proof that the South is really just backwoods, racist hillbillies.  Radley correctly asked the question as an outsider trying to make sense of it.  Robert Porter is considerably less acquainted with the South (and America also, apparently), yet he wants to play judge and jury about what they represent and where the market for these is.

6) If these are really unacceptable in the black community in Charleston (the only people who really matter in this), then they have the power to have these removed immediately.  Considering that they&#039;re in the freakin airport, it would take one call to a city councilman for these to be gone.  Barring that, I&#039;m certain that there&#039;s a businessmen or lawyers group in Charleston that could convince a gift shop owner to remove $50 worth of crap from their shelves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t believe this is still going, and, naturally, I got thoughts</p>
<p>1) re: thorn.    I&#8217;ve never seen a Klan rally either.  Interestingly, the two Pat &#8220;saw&#8221; consisted of every Klan member in the nation according to the SPLC.  I thought that would have been newsworthy or something.</p>
<p>2) Robert, you said that you are not personally offended by these.  You said that these are offensive to black Americans because of the stereotypes.  Yet, one commenter after another has testified that &#8220;Black Americana&#8221; is mostly purchased by blacks.   And now you have the nerve to say that someone else is playing gatekeeper to what is offensive.</p>
<p>3) The assumption that racist white people would buy these is laughable.  I&#8217;ve know many racists in my life, and none of them liked black people.  Fittingly, none of them had any sort of black memorabilia in their house.  Kinda makes sense when you think about it.</p>
<p>4) Padreag is apparently mixed-raced and offended by these which he/she has every right to be.  The issue, though, isn&#8217;t whether they&#8217;re offensive in a vacuum (which they obviously are), but if the market is among non-racists who purchase them for historical reasons.  I think the latter is clearly what&#8217;s going on here.</p>
<p>5) The disturbing part of this is that people act like they want this to be proof that the South is really just backwoods, racist hillbillies.  Radley correctly asked the question as an outsider trying to make sense of it.  Robert Porter is considerably less acquainted with the South (and America also, apparently), yet he wants to play judge and jury about what they represent and where the market for these is.</p>
<p>6) If these are really unacceptable in the black community in Charleston (the only people who really matter in this), then they have the power to have these removed immediately.  Considering that they&#8217;re in the freakin airport, it would take one call to a city councilman for these to be gone.  Barring that, I&#8217;m certain that there&#8217;s a businessmen or lawyers group in Charleston that could convince a gift shop owner to remove $50 worth of crap from their shelves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thorn</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85934</link>
		<dc:creator>thorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85934</guid>
		<description>Pat,

Two thoughts...

1) Why do Klan rallys seem to spontaneously occur every time you visit the South? As someone who was born and lived in the South for 26 years, I&#039;ve yet to see a Klan rally. Am I not on the memo list?

2) Though I&#039;ve never seen a Klan rally, I have lived a week riots which included lootings, beatings, shootings, and of course marches in the streets and buildings on fire. However, this occured in Cincinnati, OH - not the South.

thorn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat,</p>
<p>Two thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>1) Why do Klan rallys seem to spontaneously occur every time you visit the South? As someone who was born and lived in the South for 26 years, I&#8217;ve yet to see a Klan rally. Am I not on the memo list?</p>
<p>2) Though I&#8217;ve never seen a Klan rally, I have lived a week riots which included lootings, beatings, shootings, and of course marches in the streets and buildings on fire. However, this occured in Cincinnati, OH &#8211; not the South.</p>
<p>thorn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno49</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85912</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85912</guid>
		<description>&quot;Claiming any offense is based on “political correctness” and “ignorance” is, in itself, ignorant.&quot;

Touche, Mr. Porter.  Touche.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Claiming any offense is based on “political correctness” and “ignorance” is, in itself, ignorant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Touche, Mr. Porter.  Touche.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paedrag</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85891</link>
		<dc:creator>Paedrag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85891</guid>
		<description>I would say that yes, the figurines are offensive; anyone who think they&#039;re merely some sort of innocent memoribilia from former times needs to look into the history of minstrel shows and blackface. 

However, I would not say that the South is any more &quot;racist and ignorant&quot; than any other region of the country; it just has a culture that is in some areas very different from that of &quot;mainstream&quot; America. I&#039;m a native Midwesterner and to me the Confederate flag represents slavery and racism, and always has. So, when I went to Mount Vernon earlier this year, I was fairly appalled to see various items in the gift shops emblazoned with the flag. I was specially shocked to see it on kids&#039; toys (little Civil War hats, etc.). I have seen other instances of this in Virginia as well. But to a lot of white Southerners the flag is still very much a symbol of regional pride and has little if any racial overtones, and they naturally resent Yankees or &quot;liberals&quot; who suggest it does. Many blacks see it as being a symbol of Jim Crow and racial oppression. 

I guess I am saying that to a large extent what is &quot;offensive&quot; depends on who you ask; it&#039;s a very subjective term. But for me, a mixed-race Midwesterner, those figurines are definitely offensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that yes, the figurines are offensive; anyone who think they&#8217;re merely some sort of innocent memoribilia from former times needs to look into the history of minstrel shows and blackface. </p>
<p>However, I would not say that the South is any more &#8220;racist and ignorant&#8221; than any other region of the country; it just has a culture that is in some areas very different from that of &#8220;mainstream&#8221; America. I&#8217;m a native Midwesterner and to me the Confederate flag represents slavery and racism, and always has. So, when I went to Mount Vernon earlier this year, I was fairly appalled to see various items in the gift shops emblazoned with the flag. I was specially shocked to see it on kids&#8217; toys (little Civil War hats, etc.). I have seen other instances of this in Virginia as well. But to a lot of white Southerners the flag is still very much a symbol of regional pride and has little if any racial overtones, and they naturally resent Yankees or &#8220;liberals&#8221; who suggest it does. Many blacks see it as being a symbol of Jim Crow and racial oppression. </p>
<p>I guess I am saying that to a large extent what is &#8220;offensive&#8221; depends on who you ask; it&#8217;s a very subjective term. But for me, a mixed-race Midwesterner, those figurines are definitely offensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert S. Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85890</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert S. Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85890</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;and btw . . . I am Catholic and don’t care if you are offended by my little joke.&lt;/i&gt;

Well that&#039;s fine, don&#039;t be. Just don&#039;t pretend you are the gatekeeper on what is and isn&#039;t offensive. If someone is offended by something instead of immediately rejecting their offense perhaps it would be worthwhile to investigate the reasons behind it. Claiming any offense is based on &quot;political correctness&quot; and &quot;ignorance&quot; is, in itself, ignorant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>and btw . . . I am Catholic and don’t care if you are offended by my little joke.</i></p>
<p>Well that&#8217;s fine, don&#8217;t be. Just don&#8217;t pretend you are the gatekeeper on what is and isn&#8217;t offensive. If someone is offended by something instead of immediately rejecting their offense perhaps it would be worthwhile to investigate the reasons behind it. Claiming any offense is based on &#8220;political correctness&#8221; and &#8220;ignorance&#8221; is, in itself, ignorant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert S. Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85889</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert S. Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85889</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So you think there’s racist white people in the South with black figurines?&lt;/i&gt;

Yes... They&#039;re probably in the North too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So you think there’s racist white people in the South with black figurines?</i></p>
<p>Yes&#8230; They&#8217;re probably in the North too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno49</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85884</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85884</guid>
		<description>and btw . . . I am Catholic and don&#039;t care if you are offended by my little joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and btw . . . I am Catholic and don&#8217;t care if you are offended by my little joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno49</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85883</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85883</guid>
		<description>To Robert and Pat. . .

The Catholics called . . . they want their guilt back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Robert and Pat. . .</p>
<p>The Catholics called . . . they want their guilt back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85852</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85852</guid>
		<description>TO: #74 &#124;  Deoxy &#124;  April 11th, 2008 at 6:11 pm

A lot of people join the Klan. Does that make the Klan right?

A lot of people followed Hitler. Did that make him right?

So I&#039;m foaming at the mouth for being sensitive to the daily affronts experienced by others as a result of these back-biting little slaps in the face that white red-necks place around in our culture.

Things like this doll display are a constant reminder to minorities that these racist creeps still exist and that they would be happy to resurrect those good old days. Shouldn&#039;t a black American be able to go to a store in a public airport and not be confronted by some snide dehumanizing representation of the oppression of black America?

I would accept the display if it included a pot bellied white creep holding a whip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: #74 |  Deoxy |  April 11th, 2008 at 6:11 pm</p>
<p>A lot of people join the Klan. Does that make the Klan right?</p>
<p>A lot of people followed Hitler. Did that make him right?</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m foaming at the mouth for being sensitive to the daily affronts experienced by others as a result of these back-biting little slaps in the face that white red-necks place around in our culture.</p>
<p>Things like this doll display are a constant reminder to minorities that these racist creeps still exist and that they would be happy to resurrect those good old days. Shouldn&#8217;t a black American be able to go to a store in a public airport and not be confronted by some snide dehumanizing representation of the oppression of black America?</p>
<p>I would accept the display if it included a pot bellied white creep holding a whip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85851</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85851</guid>
		<description>TO: #75 &#124;  thorn &#124;  April 12th, 2008 at 12:22 am

I lived in central Florida for a couple of years. The day I arrived in town there was a Klan protest going on against hiring a minority police officer. Thousands of Klan garbed thugs angrily threatening the city hall. The day I left Florida there was a massive Klan protest going on. Again with fully robed Klansmen protesting. This time against having the confederate flag removed from the county office building. 

As a journalist I have been to Klan rallies in both the north and the south. The difference being that the north has social diversity in the workplace and higher union wage levels that allow people, of all colors, to rise up from the economic bottom of society. In the right-to-work south poor people, especially minorities, are still oppressed by not having any economic opportunity even where there are jobs because white control all the jobs and minorities can only get the worst lowest paying jobs.

I covered a fire in a poor black neighborhood in Florida. The white firemen used water only to keep the fire from spreading. Not to stop the fire in the house. When I asked about this I was told that the n&#039;s house was not worth the risk of engaging the fire. The let the house burn to the ground. I have covered thousands of fires and never heard that outside the south.

The white south is a racist and backward as it has ever been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: #75 |  thorn |  April 12th, 2008 at 12:22 am</p>
<p>I lived in central Florida for a couple of years. The day I arrived in town there was a Klan protest going on against hiring a minority police officer. Thousands of Klan garbed thugs angrily threatening the city hall. The day I left Florida there was a massive Klan protest going on. Again with fully robed Klansmen protesting. This time against having the confederate flag removed from the county office building. </p>
<p>As a journalist I have been to Klan rallies in both the north and the south. The difference being that the north has social diversity in the workplace and higher union wage levels that allow people, of all colors, to rise up from the economic bottom of society. In the right-to-work south poor people, especially minorities, are still oppressed by not having any economic opportunity even where there are jobs because white control all the jobs and minorities can only get the worst lowest paying jobs.</p>
<p>I covered a fire in a poor black neighborhood in Florida. The white firemen used water only to keep the fire from spreading. Not to stop the fire in the house. When I asked about this I was told that the n&#8217;s house was not worth the risk of engaging the fire. The let the house burn to the ground. I have covered thousands of fires and never heard that outside the south.</p>
<p>The white south is a racist and backward as it has ever been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85849</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85849</guid>
		<description>TO: #78 &#124;  Robert S. Porter &#124;  April 12th, 2008 at 1:49 am

Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: #78 |  Robert S. Porter |  April 12th, 2008 at 1:49 am</p>
<p>Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85818</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85818</guid>
		<description>So you think there&#039;s racist white people in the South with black figurines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you think there&#8217;s racist white people in the South with black figurines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert S. Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85816</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert S. Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 05:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85816</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The problem I have with comments like yours is that you assume these dolls are racist and work from there.&lt;/i&gt;

And you start from the assumption that they&#039;re not offensive. The responsiblity lies with you to explain how dolls based on the racial slurs and the clearly offensive blackface routine are not offensive.

&lt;i&gt;Do you really think the South is so assbackwards that overtly racist knicknacks are sold in airports?&lt;/i&gt;

Yes. I think people remain ignorant and hateful to this day. 

&lt;i&gt;Perhaps if this issue piques your curiosity, you should do some reasearch and try to make sense of it instead of assuming that the South is chockablock with racist neanderthals.&lt;/i&gt;

And perhaps you should do some research on the origins and meanings.

What in effect you are saying is that you&#039;re not offended therefore no one else has the right to be offended. That&#039;s very easy for you to say.

As one historian (doubtlessly a politically correct liberal!) has explained, &quot;The Mammy was created by white Southerners to redeem the relationship between black women and white men within slave society in response to the antislavery attack from the North during the ante-bellum period.&quot; Thus the Mammy and Sambo figurines that come out of the Jim Crow era are a direct reflection of this. Don&#039;t try to tell me that I&#039;m just maligning the South. Racism is &lt;b&gt;real&lt;/b&gt;, yes in both the South and the North, but Southern racism is more overt while Northern is more hidden.

There is no reason, whatsoever, to defend these racial stereotypes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The problem I have with comments like yours is that you assume these dolls are racist and work from there.</i></p>
<p>And you start from the assumption that they&#8217;re not offensive. The responsiblity lies with you to explain how dolls based on the racial slurs and the clearly offensive blackface routine are not offensive.</p>
<p><i>Do you really think the South is so assbackwards that overtly racist knicknacks are sold in airports?</i></p>
<p>Yes. I think people remain ignorant and hateful to this day. </p>
<p><i>Perhaps if this issue piques your curiosity, you should do some reasearch and try to make sense of it instead of assuming that the South is chockablock with racist neanderthals.</i></p>
<p>And perhaps you should do some research on the origins and meanings.</p>
<p>What in effect you are saying is that you&#8217;re not offended therefore no one else has the right to be offended. That&#8217;s very easy for you to say.</p>
<p>As one historian (doubtlessly a politically correct liberal!) has explained, &#8220;The Mammy was created by white Southerners to redeem the relationship between black women and white men within slave society in response to the antislavery attack from the North during the ante-bellum period.&#8221; Thus the Mammy and Sambo figurines that come out of the Jim Crow era are a direct reflection of this. Don&#8217;t try to tell me that I&#8217;m just maligning the South. Racism is <b>real</b>, yes in both the South and the North, but Southern racism is more overt while Northern is more hidden.</p>
<p>There is no reason, whatsoever, to defend these racial stereotypes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85810</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85810</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a well-known fact that Nazis often decorated their homes with little Jew figurines and McCarthy had an extensive collection of dolls with brown clothes and bad haircuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a well-known fact that Nazis often decorated their homes with little Jew figurines and McCarthy had an extensive collection of dolls with brown clothes and bad haircuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon H</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85808</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85808</guid>
		<description>Ditto what Deoxy said.

It kinda depends on who the market is for them, doesn&#039;t it?

If it&#039;s for non-black folks who are racist or don&#039;t know any better, and such people make up the majority of purchasers, then yeah, it&#039;s pretty bad.

If most buyers are black, then I presume they have perfectly valid reasons for buying tacky racist mementoes of the old south.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto what Deoxy said.</p>
<p>It kinda depends on who the market is for them, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s for non-black folks who are racist or don&#8217;t know any better, and such people make up the majority of purchasers, then yeah, it&#8217;s pretty bad.</p>
<p>If most buyers are black, then I presume they have perfectly valid reasons for buying tacky racist mementoes of the old south.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thorn</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85807</link>
		<dc:creator>thorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85807</guid>
		<description>Pat Rogers,

I&#039;ve not used a cop-out, nor have I justified any racism in the South by declaring that racism is more acceptable because it is also present in the North.

You stated, &quot;“The South is still as racist and ignorant as it has ever been.” and my response was simply pointing out that it is quite false. The South is far less racist than in the 1800&#039;s, or for that matter the 1950&#039;s.

I inferred from your statement that you find the South - not the North, and not America in general - to be a center of ignorance and racism. My reply to you was stating this is not the case. In my experience, those 2 factors exist more in the North than the South.

thorn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat Rogers,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not used a cop-out, nor have I justified any racism in the South by declaring that racism is more acceptable because it is also present in the North.</p>
<p>You stated, &#8220;“The South is still as racist and ignorant as it has ever been.” and my response was simply pointing out that it is quite false. The South is far less racist than in the 1800&#8217;s, or for that matter the 1950&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I inferred from your statement that you find the South &#8211; not the North, and not America in general &#8211; to be a center of ignorance and racism. My reply to you was stating this is not the case. In my experience, those 2 factors exist more in the North than the South.</p>
<p>thorn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deoxy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85782</link>
		<dc:creator>Deoxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85782</guid>
		<description>Pat Rogers,

Um, did you read the multiple witness accounts that these objects are primarily purchased by blacks, the group you are supposedly defending with your mouth-foaming rant?  Good job - reactions like that aren&#039;t solving the problem, they ARE the problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat Rogers,</p>
<p>Um, did you read the multiple witness accounts that these objects are primarily purchased by blacks, the group you are supposedly defending with your mouth-foaming rant?  Good job &#8211; reactions like that aren&#8217;t solving the problem, they ARE the problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno49</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85779</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85779</guid>
		<description>Alex,

I remember the first time I heard the term &#039;coonass&#039;.  It was from a coonass. :) I figured out right away what it meant because of the context it was used in.

I&#039;m sure a great many people had egg on their face after their ignorance was exposed to them in learning what the colloquialism meant.  And yet some people maintained it &lt;b&gt;was&lt;/b&gt; racist regardless of explanation simply because it &lt;b&gt;&#039;sounded&#039;&lt;/b&gt; racist.

Thanks for bringing that up, very applicable here.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>I remember the first time I heard the term &#8216;coonass&#8217;.  It was from a coonass. :) I figured out right away what it meant because of the context it was used in.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure a great many people had egg on their face after their ignorance was exposed to them in learning what the colloquialism meant.  And yet some people maintained it <b>was</b> racist regardless of explanation simply because it <b>&#8217;sounded&#8217;</b> racist.</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing that up, very applicable here.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/comment-page-2/#comment-85775</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/10/is-this-offensive/#comment-85775</guid>
		<description>Robert Porter,

The problem I have with comments like yours is that you assume these dolls are racist and work from there.  Do you really think the South is so assbackwards that overtly racist knicknacks are sold in airports?  Perhaps if this issue piques your curiosity, you should do some reasearch and try to make sense of it instead of assuming that the South is chockablock with racist neanderthals.

This thread reminds me of when a reporter taped Nick Saban relaying a story about a &quot;coonass fellow.&quot;  The next day there was all sorts of media outrage until people started figuring out that coonass isn&#039;t offensive to most.  If you spend 5 minutes in southern LA, you&#039;ll see a RCA (Registered Coonass) bumper sticker on an appropriately coonass vehicle.

Lee,

I think that question was directed at Trish; however, you should probably try the Cracker Barrel.  They got everything there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Porter,</p>
<p>The problem I have with comments like yours is that you assume these dolls are racist and work from there.  Do you really think the South is so assbackwards that overtly racist knicknacks are sold in airports?  Perhaps if this issue piques your curiosity, you should do some reasearch and try to make sense of it instead of assuming that the South is chockablock with racist neanderthals.</p>
<p>This thread reminds me of when a reporter taped Nick Saban relaying a story about a &#8220;coonass fellow.&#8221;  The next day there was all sorts of media outrage until people started figuring out that coonass isn&#8217;t offensive to most.  If you spend 5 minutes in southern LA, you&#8217;ll see a RCA (Registered Coonass) bumper sticker on an appropriately coonass vehicle.</p>
<p>Lee,</p>
<p>I think that question was directed at Trish; however, you should probably try the Cracker Barrel.  They got everything there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
