http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/06/death-by-blogging/ It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do. Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:00:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/06/death-by-blogging/#comment-84695 Gary McGath Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:36:41 +0000 http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/06/death-by-blogging/#comment-84695 It's not writing that gives bloggers heart attacks. It's reading the stuff that we're commenting on. It’s not writing that gives bloggers heart attacks. It’s reading the stuff that we’re commenting on.

]]> http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/06/death-by-blogging/#comment-84687 Jeff Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:00:07 +0000 http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/06/death-by-blogging/#comment-84687 Over-under on the time until someone suggests a law restricting blogging: two years? Over-under on the time until someone suggests a law restricting blogging: two years?

]]> http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/06/death-by-blogging/#comment-84686 Kieffer Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:48:53 +0000 http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/06/death-by-blogging/#comment-84686 Well, I think the message here is clear. Keeping up with the 24-7 news cycle is best left to actual professional journalists. Like those at the New York Times. Well, I think the message here is clear. Keeping up with the 24-7 news cycle is best left to actual professional journalists. Like those at the New York Times.

]]> http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/06/death-by-blogging/#comment-84603 robertl Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:20:05 +0000 http://www.theagitator.com/2008/04/06/death-by-blogging/#comment-84603 Yeah, yeah; and we're risking ours reading it...... Be careful out there. Yeah, yeah; and we’re risking ours reading it…… Be careful out there.

]]>