<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Positive Liberty &#187; Occasional Notes: Best of the Latest</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83825</link>
		<dc:creator>Positive Liberty &#187; Occasional Notes: Best of the Latest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83825</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog Comment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog Comment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83592</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83592</guid>
		<description>*joins group hug* ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*joins group hug* ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83437</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83437</guid>
		<description>Sure. It's a little man-heavy for my liking, but what the hell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure. It&#8217;s a little man-heavy for my liking, but what the hell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83424</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83424</guid>
		<description>We've been called "sheep".

*wipes tear*

I'm hurt. I'm really hurt, you guys.




Group hug?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been called &#8220;sheep&#8221;.</p>
<p>*wipes tear*</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hurt. I&#8217;m really hurt, you guys.</p>
<p>Group hug?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill F.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83419</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83419</guid>
		<description>“I won’t I won’t and you can’t make me.”

Sad to think that this sort of person is on OUR side of the drug debate. She should go back to blogging about dolphins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I won’t I won’t and you can’t make me.”</p>
<p>Sad to think that this sort of person is on OUR side of the drug debate. She should go back to blogging about dolphins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83278</guid>
		<description>#13 &#124;   Rebelleink 
&lt;blockquote&gt;First, Dave Kreuger, I believe the blogger is a woman. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks.  You're right.  I screwed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13 |   Rebelleink </p>
<blockquote><p>First, Dave Kreuger, I believe the blogger is a woman. </p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks.  You&#8217;re right.  I screwed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83271</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83271</guid>
		<description>She stil own't apologize. her latest response: "I won't I won't and you can't make me."
Isn't it *fun* reasoning with two-year olds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She stil own&#8217;t apologize. her latest response: &#8220;I won&#8217;t I won&#8217;t and you can&#8217;t make me.&#8221;<br />
Isn&#8217;t it *fun* reasoning with two-year olds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83126</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83126</guid>
		<description>Actually, my mental image of Radley has always been that little guy up there on the top-left corner with the megaphone.

It's ruined now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, my mental image of Radley has always been that little guy up there on the top-left corner with the megaphone.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ruined now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kishnevi</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83058</link>
		<dc:creator>kishnevi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83058</guid>
		<description>It's your looks, Mr. Balko.  You look like a cop in training who would say that sort of thing and mean it.   
I was a little shocked to see it myself.  I've never seen a picture of you before, and my mental image did not include short hair and a tie :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s your looks, Mr. Balko.  You look like a cop in training who would say that sort of thing and mean it.<br />
I was a little shocked to see it myself.  I&#8217;ve never seen a picture of you before, and my mental image did not include short hair and a tie <img src='http://www.theagitator.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilliss</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83040</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83040</guid>
		<description>Ha!  "Sarchasm!"  That's my new favorite word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  &#8220;Sarchasm!&#8221;  That&#8217;s my new favorite word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83039</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83039</guid>
		<description>#8 Thomas
&lt;blockquote&gt;What sad times we live in when people are incapable of recognizing satire.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

One of the things I find absolutely astounding about this blog is that almost everyone recognizes sarcasm without the need to put smiley faces or some other symbol of humor or exaggeration.  I do not know of another message board or blog that is like that (not that I've conducted an exhaustive study).  I attribute that to the incredibly high average IQ of the posters here (which I'm hoping will rub off on me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#8 Thomas</p>
<blockquote><p>What sad times we live in when people are incapable of recognizing satire.</p></blockquote>
<p>One of the things I find absolutely astounding about this blog is that almost everyone recognizes sarcasm without the need to put smiley faces or some other symbol of humor or exaggeration.  I do not know of another message board or blog that is like that (not that I&#8217;ve conducted an exhaustive study).  I attribute that to the incredibly high average IQ of the posters here (which I&#8217;m hoping will rub off on me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montie</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83038</link>
		<dc:creator>Montie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83038</guid>
		<description>T-shirt....  "pig/antichrist" on the front.  "reason.com" on the back.  I say go for cafe press or whoever is cool these days and have some made.  I'd buy one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-shirt&#8230;.  &#8220;pig/antichrist&#8221; on the front.  &#8220;reason.com&#8221; on the back.  I say go for cafe press or whoever is cool these days and have some made.  I&#8217;d buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: limited slip</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83028</link>
		<dc:creator>limited slip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83028</guid>
		<description>I wondered if this was just an attempt to generate more traffic, but after reading the latest blog posts (a long feature on a new disneyland attraction and a video about a dolphin rescue) I'm fairly sure she's just immune to sarcasm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered if this was just an attempt to generate more traffic, but after reading the latest blog posts (a long feature on a new disneyland attraction and a video about a dolphin rescue) I&#8217;m fairly sure she&#8217;s just immune to sarcasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83025</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-83025</guid>
		<description>He got to see his daughter after all.
http://tinyurl.com/ywe2th</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He got to see his daughter after all.<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/ywe2th" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ywe2th</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windypundit</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82994</link>
		<dc:creator>Windypundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82994</guid>
		<description>Draughn's rule of internet sarcasm: No matter how outrageous your post, someone somewhere will have encountered that exact same thing advocated in all seriousness and with great earnestness...and they will flame you for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Draughn&#8217;s rule of internet sarcasm: No matter how outrageous your post, someone somewhere will have encountered that exact same thing advocated in all seriousness and with great earnestness&#8230;and they will flame you for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.D. "Charlie" Bales</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82985</link>
		<dc:creator>C.D. "Charlie" Bales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82985</guid>
		<description>Oh, ho, ho, irony! Oh, no, no, we don't get that here. See, uh, people ski topless here while smoking dope, so irony's not really a, a high priority. We haven't had any irony here since about, uh, '83, when I was the only practitioner of it. And I stopped because I was tired of being stared at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, ho, ho, irony! Oh, no, no, we don&#8217;t get that here. See, uh, people ski topless here while smoking dope, so irony&#8217;s not really a, a high priority. We haven&#8217;t had any irony here since about, uh, &#8216;83, when I was the only practitioner of it. And I stopped because I was tired of being stared at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82983</guid>
		<description>Plenty are coming to your defense, including me.  As a previous poster said, hopefully its not some kind of reverse irony to really mess with everyone's head!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plenty are coming to your defense, including me.  As a previous poster said, hopefully its not some kind of reverse irony to really mess with everyone&#8217;s head!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebelleink</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82982</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebelleink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82982</guid>
		<description>First, Dave Kreuger, I believe the blogger is a woman. Or at least the blog itself belongs to a woman. Does someone know that it was the blog owner who posted that? 

I'm going to give her the benfit of the doubt, since the plight of Jacyi Yaeger is something she feels passionatly about and instense emotion can cloud judgement. Not that it's an excuse for not taking 2 minutes to look at the history of a person's work before trying to get them fired from thier job. I'd give her 24 hours since time of first comment before swooping in and writing nasty-grams to her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, Dave Kreuger, I believe the blogger is a woman. Or at least the blog itself belongs to a woman. Does someone know that it was the blog owner who posted that? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to give her the benfit of the doubt, since the plight of Jacyi Yaeger is something she feels passionatly about and instense emotion can cloud judgement. Not that it&#8217;s an excuse for not taking 2 minutes to look at the history of a person&#8217;s work before trying to get them fired from thier job. I&#8217;d give her 24 hours since time of first comment before swooping in and writing nasty-grams to her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou W</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82981</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82981</guid>
		<description>Nice picture though.  If I was you I'd probably have that framed, with 'Pig/Antichrist' right under it.  Good conversation piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice picture though.  If I was you I&#8217;d probably have that framed, with &#8216;Pig/Antichrist&#8217; right under it.  Good conversation piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82968</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/27/sigh-15/#comment-82968</guid>
		<description>Didn't someone once say that Americans don't get irony?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t someone once say that Americans don&#8217;t get irony?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
