<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predicitons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:54:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Agitator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Biden</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-171627</link>
		<dc:creator>The Agitator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Biden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-171627</guid>
		<description>[...] humble Agitator predicted the Biden pick last February. It was a prediction made mostly from cynicism. I wish I had been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] humble Agitator predicted the Biden pick last February. It was a prediction made mostly from cynicism. I wish I had been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zombyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75758</link>
		<dc:creator>zombyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75758</guid>
		<description>And for the record, sharp-eyed editorial types: for today, can we pretend that to, too, and two are all spelled the same ways?

Please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for the record, sharp-eyed editorial types: for today, can we pretend that to, too, and two are all spelled the same ways?</p>
<p>Please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ResurrectionSong</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75757</link>
		<dc:creator>ResurrectionSong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75757</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Okay, Feel Free to Disagree...&lt;/strong&gt;

I left a comment in response to comment #24 over here because of a post that I read here (thanks for the link, Rob!), but I didn&apos;t want to deprive people of the opportunity to disagree with me here. So, here goes: &quot;(Unfortunately I really don...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Okay, Feel Free to Disagree&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I left a comment in response to comment #24 over here because of a post that I read here (thanks for the link, Rob!), but I didn&apos;t want to deprive people of the opportunity to disagree with me here. So, here goes: &quot;(Unfortunately I really don&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zombyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75756</link>
		<dc:creator>zombyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75756</guid>
		<description>&quot;(Unfortunately I really don’t see McCain picking Paul…although honestly it’s absolutely the very best thing he could do.)&quot;

Why? Because Paul will bring that extra 4% of the vote that he&#039;s been missing? Or, maybe, because it would establish his bona fides with the anti-war folks? Or, perhaps, you were thinking that it would bring in extra white supremacists? Nah, can&#039;t be that, he&#039;ll already get the &quot;I ain&#039;t votin&#039; for a black man&quot; block by default.

No, no, I know, it&#039;s because the gold standard hordes were just dying to find a reason to believe that McCain was the guy to make their wishes come true.

Yeah. That would really blow it open.

Whatever anyone thinks of Ron Paul, not only would it not be the very best decision that McCain could make for VP, it would be a ludicrous proposition. They don&#039;t have much in common and Paul won&#039;t make McCain into a viable candidate for the libertarians, anti-war activists, or any of the others that have rallied to Paul.

Which is okay: frankly, he doesn&#039;t need those folks to win the election. He needs to woo the conservative base without losing the independents--that will be tough since movement conservatives are in a mood to fight and he&#039;s not a particularly conservative candidate. Moving to far right, though, will lose his natural constituency: moderate Republicans and independents who admire his &quot;maverick&quot; brand.

If Obama is the nominee on the other side--and he is--then McCain has an uphill battle to winning the presidency. If Hillary had been the candidate, I think he would have chewed her and Bill up, spit them out, and taken the White House by a huge margin. But Obama isn&#039;t an unlikable, arrogant shrew, he&#039;s just a stealth lefty waiting to unleash a speedy financial doom on the country&#039;s economy.

We can talk bad about Bush all we want, but an Obama presidency will be a much more painful thing for conservatives and libertarians--not always for the same reasons, but the results will be like slow torture. Expansive new social programs that will dwarf the Bush errors (the pill bill will look tiny compared to whatever flavor universal health care Obama and a friendly congress tosses on our backs), for example.

The next four years could be brutally painful.

Of course, for libertarians and Democrats, the pain might be just as pronounced with a McCain White House. 

Which goes to show that when you&#039;re a libertarian, you just can&#039;t freakin&#039; win. Poor bastards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(Unfortunately I really don’t see McCain picking Paul…although honestly it’s absolutely the very best thing he could do.)&#8221;</p>
<p>Why? Because Paul will bring that extra 4% of the vote that he&#8217;s been missing? Or, maybe, because it would establish his bona fides with the anti-war folks? Or, perhaps, you were thinking that it would bring in extra white supremacists? Nah, can&#8217;t be that, he&#8217;ll already get the &#8220;I ain&#8217;t votin&#8217; for a black man&#8221; block by default.</p>
<p>No, no, I know, it&#8217;s because the gold standard hordes were just dying to find a reason to believe that McCain was the guy to make their wishes come true.</p>
<p>Yeah. That would really blow it open.</p>
<p>Whatever anyone thinks of Ron Paul, not only would it not be the very best decision that McCain could make for VP, it would be a ludicrous proposition. They don&#8217;t have much in common and Paul won&#8217;t make McCain into a viable candidate for the libertarians, anti-war activists, or any of the others that have rallied to Paul.</p>
<p>Which is okay: frankly, he doesn&#8217;t need those folks to win the election. He needs to woo the conservative base without losing the independents&#8211;that will be tough since movement conservatives are in a mood to fight and he&#8217;s not a particularly conservative candidate. Moving to far right, though, will lose his natural constituency: moderate Republicans and independents who admire his &#8220;maverick&#8221; brand.</p>
<p>If Obama is the nominee on the other side&#8211;and he is&#8211;then McCain has an uphill battle to winning the presidency. If Hillary had been the candidate, I think he would have chewed her and Bill up, spit them out, and taken the White House by a huge margin. But Obama isn&#8217;t an unlikable, arrogant shrew, he&#8217;s just a stealth lefty waiting to unleash a speedy financial doom on the country&#8217;s economy.</p>
<p>We can talk bad about Bush all we want, but an Obama presidency will be a much more painful thing for conservatives and libertarians&#8211;not always for the same reasons, but the results will be like slow torture. Expansive new social programs that will dwarf the Bush errors (the pill bill will look tiny compared to whatever flavor universal health care Obama and a friendly congress tosses on our backs), for example.</p>
<p>The next four years could be brutally painful.</p>
<p>Of course, for libertarians and Democrats, the pain might be just as pronounced with a McCain White House. </p>
<p>Which goes to show that when you&#8217;re a libertarian, you just can&#8217;t freakin&#8217; win. Poor bastards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75590</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75590</guid>
		<description>&quot;Over/under on the number of times someone on the Fox cable network will mistakenly refer to Obama as “Osama” between now and the election: 7. &quot;

Shouldn&#039;t this read: &quot;Over/under on the number of times someone on the Fox cable network will &quot;mistakenly&quot; refer to Obama as “Osama” between now and the election: 7.&quot;
lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Over/under on the number of times someone on the Fox cable network will mistakenly refer to Obama as “Osama” between now and the election: 7. &#8221;</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t this read: &#8220;Over/under on the number of times someone on the Fox cable network will &#8220;mistakenly&#8221; refer to Obama as “Osama” between now and the election: 7.&#8221;<br />
lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave.s.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75468</link>
		<dc:creator>dave.s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75468</guid>
		<description>Oh, come on!  Biden??? he continually embarrasses himself.  Open mouth, insert foot.  And he is a Senator, has never run anything.  Obama needs a governor.  Bredesen, Sebelius, Napolitano.  Warner is the Dems&#039; ticket to the second VA senate seat, he can&#039;t be spared, nor can Webb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on!  Biden??? he continually embarrasses himself.  Open mouth, insert foot.  And he is a Senator, has never run anything.  Obama needs a governor.  Bredesen, Sebelius, Napolitano.  Warner is the Dems&#8217; ticket to the second VA senate seat, he can&#8217;t be spared, nor can Webb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75388</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75388</guid>
		<description>Jim Webb is the obvoius pick for Obama.  He&#039;s perfect (for Obama) in every conceivable way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Webb is the obvoius pick for Obama.  He&#8217;s perfect (for Obama) in every conceivable way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDL</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75383</link>
		<dc:creator>TDL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75383</guid>
		<description>Richardson makes more sense as Obama&#039;s VP selection.  McCain can select Jesus as his VP and still lose.

Regards,
TDL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richardson makes more sense as Obama&#8217;s VP selection.  McCain can select Jesus as his VP and still lose.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
TDL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75329</link>
		<dc:creator>Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75329</guid>
		<description>Fox won&#039;t have any Obama/Osama problems.  They know people will be watching for it.  You can&#039;t beat CNN and MSNBC for general incompetence and doucebaggery, though, so I think you will get to 7 easily between the two of them.

And McCain might indeed pick Lieberman, and if he does, he won&#039;t break 25%.  He would be courting voters who are going to vote D anyways, and kill any base support.  He&#039;s already perceived as being too far left, and Lieberman is authentic left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox won&#8217;t have any Obama/Osama problems.  They know people will be watching for it.  You can&#8217;t beat CNN and MSNBC for general incompetence and doucebaggery, though, so I think you will get to 7 easily between the two of them.</p>
<p>And McCain might indeed pick Lieberman, and if he does, he won&#8217;t break 25%.  He would be courting voters who are going to vote D anyways, and kill any base support.  He&#8217;s already perceived as being too far left, and Lieberman is authentic left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jethro</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jethro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75274</guid>
		<description>“Get ready for Jeb Bush in 2012?

I hope not. I want to see something like a Palin/Jindal Republican ticket in &#039;12.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Get ready for Jeb Bush in 2012?</p>
<p>I hope not. I want to see something like a Palin/Jindal Republican ticket in &#8217;12.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75243</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75243</guid>
		<description>I think you have the number who call him &quot;Osama&quot; quite low.  If one includes Faux News, I&#039;d say 11.   I don&#039;t think McCain will pick Lieberman.  I&#039;m thinking Kay Bailey Hutchinson.  And I totally hope that Obama picks Chris Dodd.  Joe Biden can be Secretary of State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have the number who call him &#8220;Osama&#8221; quite low.  If one includes Faux News, I&#8217;d say 11.   I don&#8217;t think McCain will pick Lieberman.  I&#8217;m thinking Kay Bailey Hutchinson.  And I totally hope that Obama picks Chris Dodd.  Joe Biden can be Secretary of State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75202</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75202</guid>
		<description>I agree with Primus: the Veep choices will have a huge and probably deciding influence on the race.

(Unfortunately I really don&#039;t see McCain picking Paul...although honestly it&#039;s absolutely the very best thing he could do.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Primus: the Veep choices will have a huge and probably deciding influence on the race.</p>
<p>(Unfortunately I really don&#8217;t see McCain picking Paul&#8230;although honestly it&#8217;s absolutely the very best thing he could do.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveT</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75178</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75178</guid>
		<description>&quot;Get ready for Jeb Bush in 2012&quot;

*heaves violently*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Get ready for Jeb Bush in 2012&#8243;</p>
<p>*heaves violently*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75137</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75137</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Over/under on the number of pundits/politicians/etc. who–intentionally or otherwise–will get in trouble for saying something racially offensive about Obama: 6.&lt;/i&gt; Definitely over. I would set this higher, around 12.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Over/under on the number of pundits/politicians/etc. who–intentionally or otherwise–will get in trouble for saying something racially offensive about Obama: 6.</i> Definitely over. I would set this higher, around 12.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knaw</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75129</link>
		<dc:creator>Knaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75129</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re way off on the Fox News &quot;Osama&quot; references and the VP picks.

Joe Biden would offer nothing in the way of electoral math to the ticket, plus his old age and gaffe-abundant mouth make his a liability on the campaign trail.

And Lieberman would be a terrible idea for McCain.  McCain is already under fire from the right wing for being a &quot;closet liberal&quot;, so choosing an ex-Democrat would be the final nail in his coffin.  

As for Fox News, I bet they&#039;re thinking up all sorts of creative and not-so-creative ways they can bring up the Osama name similarities right now.  They&#039;re probably giddy with anticipation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re way off on the Fox News &#8220;Osama&#8221; references and the VP picks.</p>
<p>Joe Biden would offer nothing in the way of electoral math to the ticket, plus his old age and gaffe-abundant mouth make his a liability on the campaign trail.</p>
<p>And Lieberman would be a terrible idea for McCain.  McCain is already under fire from the right wing for being a &#8220;closet liberal&#8221;, so choosing an ex-Democrat would be the final nail in his coffin.  </p>
<p>As for Fox News, I bet they&#8217;re thinking up all sorts of creative and not-so-creative ways they can bring up the Osama name similarities right now.  They&#8217;re probably giddy with anticipation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: primus</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75107</link>
		<dc:creator>primus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75107</guid>
		<description>McCain will pick Ron Paul as VP, he will mop the floor with BO.  Yankees who haven&#039;t voted in decades will, just to beat a &#039;black&#039; man.  The same would happen if HRC wins the nomination.  No way the USans are ready for a black OR a woman as POTUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain will pick Ron Paul as VP, he will mop the floor with BO.  Yankees who haven&#8217;t voted in decades will, just to beat a &#8216;black&#8217; man.  The same would happen if HRC wins the nomination.  No way the USans are ready for a black OR a woman as POTUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balko Predicts A Couple Of Joes &#124; VeepWatch</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75106</link>
		<dc:creator>Balko Predicts A Couple Of Joes &#124; VeepWatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75106</guid>
		<description>[...] Balko, a senior editor at Reason and editor of The Agitator, makes his predictions: McCain will pick Joe Lieberman as his running mate. Obama will pick Joe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Balko, a senior editor at Reason and editor of The Agitator, makes his predictions: McCain will pick Joe Lieberman as his running mate. Obama will pick Joe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald A</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75091</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75091</guid>
		<description>I see McCain losing 2 to 1, or worse. The far right won&#039;t show up. When the MSM turns on him after the convention, &quot;new&quot; revelations about the last member of the Keating 5 still in the senate. 

With the amount of baggage McCain comes with, it will be a bloodbath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see McCain losing 2 to 1, or worse. The far right won&#8217;t show up. When the MSM turns on him after the convention, &#8220;new&#8221; revelations about the last member of the Keating 5 still in the senate. </p>
<p>With the amount of baggage McCain comes with, it will be a bloodbath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FP</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75086</link>
		<dc:creator>FP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75086</guid>
		<description>Biden? Of &quot;clean negro&quot; fame? Of sexist vawa law fame? I don&#039;t see it happening, nor Liberman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biden? Of &#8220;clean negro&#8221; fame? Of sexist vawa law fame? I don&#8217;t see it happening, nor Liberman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/comment-page-1/#comment-75084</link>
		<dc:creator>old</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/2008/02/15/predicitons/#comment-75084</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Over/under on the number of times someone on the Fox cable network will mistakenly refer to Obama as “Osama” between now and the election: 7.&lt;/i&gt;

I will definitely take the over on that one.  I know they can pull that off on one show.  Who is going to sit there and watch Fox news 24/7 to keep the counter?  Are they reliable with good hearing?  How much can I put down on this wager?  Who holds the dough?  Are they reliable?  Will the pay-off happen as soon as they hit eight, or will I have to wait until after the inauguration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Over/under on the number of times someone on the Fox cable network will mistakenly refer to Obama as “Osama” between now and the election: 7.</i></p>
<p>I will definitely take the over on that one.  I know they can pull that off on one show.  Who is going to sit there and watch Fox news 24/7 to keep the counter?  Are they reliable with good hearing?  How much can I put down on this wager?  Who holds the dough?  Are they reliable?  Will the pay-off happen as soon as they hit eight, or will I have to wait until after the inauguration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

