Given that the majority is so keen on civil remedies (instead of exclusion) as a deterrent for illegal no-knock raids, does that mean we can expect to see Scalia, Alito, Roberts, and Thomas voting to grant cert to the masses of Section 1983 cases involving no-knocks that get denied at the appellate level because of immunity?

The obvious answer to that question shows the absurdity of their claim that civil actions are cabable of deterring illegal raids.

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 15th, 2006 at 1:42 pm by Radley Balko and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.