Smoking Healthism

Sunday, October 30th, 2005

A few drags from the smoking debate…

  • My hometown and the town I work in have both gone smoke free in the last week.
  • Meanwhile, a new study of smoking bans in Australia finds that they have no significant impact on smoking habits in the public at large, and that they in fact increase smoking in 18-24 year olds, a phenomenon the study’s authors call “the rebellion effect.”
  • Finally, the Calabasas, California city council is demonstrating how it’s own intolerance for smoking “goes to eleven,” as it were.
    A Calabasas resident recently contacted the city about an incident at a restaurant in The Commons shopping center where she couldn’t eat outdoors on a nice evening because she didn’t want to be exposed to secondhand smoke.

    The council felt it necessary to consider an ordinance against outdoor secondhand smoke.

    “(By doing this), we’re saying we promote health, and we’re encouraging folks to learn the implications of selling cigarettes and the damage that it causes,” said Mayor Pro Tem Dennis Washburn.

    Among items up for discussion are:

    1. The regulation of smoking in multi-family housing, a ruling initiated by the city of West Hollywood. Such regulation is meant to prevent smoke from drifting from one unit to the next. Like a hotel, there would be “smoking” and “nonsmoking” sections of the complexes.

    2. No smoking on city streets because cigarette butts are often thrown into the gutters, which then go into the storm drains and cause pollution.

    3. How to make tobacco sales in Calabasas undesirable or uneconomic.

    4. Regulations that allow the city to pull tobacco licenses if vendors sell to minors. The city could also, under such an ordinance, pull tobacco licenses if vendors encourage cigarette shoplifting by placing cigarettes in the front of a store.

    The city may also allow police to ticket motorists who smoke with a child in the vehicle.

    Digg it |  reddit |  del.icio.us |  Fark
  • Comments are closed.