Cool Stuff I Discovered Via Jim Henley
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005It’s not exactly theft (or the abolition of property) either, though. Perhaps it might be illuminating to consider other cases in which (1) someone does X to someone else and pays for it, and that isn’t a crime; (2) someone does X to someone else uncompensated, and that is a crime; and see how it looks when, (3) someone does X to someone against their will but compensates them (presumably at what some third party determines to be the market rate).X is “having sex with.” Case 1 is prostitution, which is
less clearly acceptable than (other?) commerce but generally
regarded as a matter for the consciences of the individuals
involved. Case 2 is rape. Case 3 looks a lot more like rape
than like prostitution to me.X is “demanding labour from.” Case 1 is employment, which
few seem to mind much. Case 2 is kidnap and slavery, or
something of the kind. Case 3 is, I suppose, kidnap and
indentured servitude of some sort. Again, 3 seems much nearer
to 2 than to 1.Anyone got an example where 3 isn’t much nearer 2 than 1?
I can’t think of any.
Jim’s site is here.
TheAgitator.com