<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thomas&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Classical Values</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64484</link>
		<dc:creator>Classical Values</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64484</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Being serious is no fun&lt;/strong&gt;

I hate to get serious after that last post (criticized for an excess of "timidity"), but some serious things did happen yesterday. First, my serious thanks to John Hawkins at Right Wing News on making Classical Values Website of the...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Being serious is no fun</strong></p>
<p>I hate to get serious after that last post (criticized for an excess of &#8220;timidity&#8221;), but some serious things did happen yesterday. First, my serious thanks to John Hawkins at Right Wing News on making Classical Values Website of the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catallarchy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64483</link>
		<dc:creator>Catallarchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 05:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64483</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Free Trading Into Commerce Submision&lt;/strong&gt;

The cruelly ironic twist, though, is that by virtue of deep divisions of labor and decreased barriers to trade, which contribute to a large proportion of our wealth, we have brought more of our lives under the expanded interpretation of the Commerce Cl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free Trading Into Commerce Submision</strong></p>
<p>The cruelly ironic twist, though, is that by virtue of deep divisions of labor and decreased barriers to trade, which contribute to a large proportion of our wealth, we have brought more of our lives under the expanded interpretation of the Commerce Cl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catallarchy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64482</link>
		<dc:creator>Catallarchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 05:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64482</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Free Trading Into Cmmerce Submision&lt;/strong&gt;

The cruelly ironic twist, though, is that by virtue of deep divisions of labor and decreased barriers to trade, which contribute to a large proportion of our wealth, we have brought more of our lives under the expanded interpretation of the Commerce Cl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free Trading Into Cmmerce Submision</strong></p>
<p>The cruelly ironic twist, though, is that by virtue of deep divisions of labor and decreased barriers to trade, which contribute to a large proportion of our wealth, we have brought more of our lives under the expanded interpretation of the Commerce Cl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake Me Up On Judgment Day</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64481</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake Me Up On Judgment Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 04:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64481</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gone to Pot&lt;/strong&gt;

I'm still waiting for someone to praise Justice Thomas on his dissent in Ashcroft v. Raich.

Oh, hey, Radley. Thanks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gone to Pot</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for someone to praise Justice Thomas on his dissent in Ashcroft v. Raich.</p>
<p>Oh, hey, Radley. Thanks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oregon Commentator Online</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64480</link>
		<dc:creator>Oregon Commentator Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 00:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64480</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Another Nail in Federalism's Coffin&lt;/strong&gt;

In a 6-3 decision the Supreme Court today ruled in favor of the federal government in Gonzales v. Raich, opening the door for federal prosecution of medical marijuana patients. The majority's opinion was based upon the despicable Wickard v. Filburn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Another Nail in Federalism&#8217;s Coffin</strong></p>
<p>In a 6-3 decision the Supreme Court today ruled in favor of the federal government in Gonzales v. Raich, opening the door for federal prosecution of medical marijuana patients. The majority&#8217;s opinion was based upon the despicable Wickard v. Filburn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garfield Ridge</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64479</link>
		<dc:creator>Garfield Ridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64479</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hillary Forgets Her Meds, Holds Fundraiser.&lt;/strong&gt;

So much for Hillary's much-vaunted move to the center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hillary Forgets Her Meds, Holds Fundraiser.</strong></p>
<p>So much for Hillary&#8217;s much-vaunted move to the center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Sources</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64478</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Sources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 20:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64478</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Justice Thomas&lt;/strong&gt;

Senator Reid may find him lacking, but Radley Balko says "He's easily the most principled and consistent defender of federalism on the court." Sadly, that's becoming a lower bar all the time. Balko writes on TheAgitator.com: If Congress can regulate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Justice Thomas</strong></p>
<p>Senator Reid may find him lacking, but Radley Balko says &#8220;He&#8217;s easily the most principled and consistent defender of federalism on the court.&#8221; Sadly, that&#8217;s becoming a lower bar all the time. Balko writes on TheAgitator.com: If Congress can regulate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protein wisdom</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64477</link>
		<dc:creator>protein wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 20:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64477</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court rules that the federal government can bar medical marijuana use&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From Reuters:The federal government has the power to prevent sick patients from smoking home&#45;grown marijuana that a doctor recommended to relieve chronic pain, a divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a setback for the medical marijuana m...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court rules that the federal government can bar medical marijuana use</strong></p>
<p>From Reuters:The federal government has the power to prevent sick patients from smoking home&#45;grown marijuana that a doctor recommended to relieve chronic pain, a divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a setback for the medical marijuana m&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modulator</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64476</link>
		<dc:creator>Modulator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64476</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Supports Federal Thugs&lt;/strong&gt;

In Gonzalez V. Raich the US supreme court ruled in favor of the federal thugs, justice department and congress, who would deny individuals living in the land of the supposedly free the authority to grow and use marijuana for medical purposes. They had ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Supports Federal Thugs</strong></p>
<p>In Gonzalez V. Raich the US supreme court ruled in favor of the federal thugs, justice department and congress, who would deny individuals living in the land of the supposedly free the authority to grow and use marijuana for medical purposes. They had &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irish Pennants</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64475</link>
		<dc:creator>Irish Pennants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64475</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Marijuana Decision&lt;/strong&gt;

The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, has ruled that the federal band on smoking marijuana overrides state laws permitting sick people to smoke marijuana to ease pain. I'm with the minority (Justices O'Connor, Rehnquist and Thomas) on this, in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Marijuana Decision</strong></p>
<p>The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, has ruled that the federal band on smoking marijuana overrides state laws permitting sick people to smoke marijuana to ease pain. I&#8217;m with the minority (Justices O&#8217;Connor, Rehnquist and Thomas) on this, in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeys and Typewriters</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/06/06/thomas/#comment-64474</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeys and Typewriters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5691#comment-64474</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;For the record...&lt;/strong&gt;

If the federal government can take you growing a plant in your backyard, harvesting it yourself, and consuming it yourself, call it "interstate commerce" and regulate it, it can literally regulate anything...Radley Balko points out that Justice Thoma...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For the record&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>If the federal government can take you growing a plant in your backyard, harvesting it yourself, and consuming it yourself, call it &#8220;interstate commerce&#8221; and regulate it, it can literally regulate anything&#8230;Radley Balko points out that Justice Thoma&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
