Powerlies
Thursday, April 7th, 2005So we’ve now learned that the Schiavo memo wasn’t a fake, and did indeed originate from the legal counsel to a Republican staffer.
Whatever. To be honest, neither scenario would have surprised me. A fake memo passed off by the Democrats would be standing operating procedure in Washington. As would shameless exploitation of a family tragedy by the Republicans.
My question is, what will the screeching bomb-throwers at Powerline do about this? They’ve been pushing the “fake memo” meme for weeks. They repeatedly stated matter-of-factly that the memo was a “fake,” and implied over and over again that it was a Democrat dirty trick. If a media figure had made the same mistake, the Powerline mob would be calling for a resignation. It’d be nice if Powerline provided an apology and retraction.
Don’t hold your breath.
So far, they’ve completely ignored the fact that they were dead wrong on the memo, that they wrongly cast aspersions on the opposing party, and that they misled their readers. Instead, they simply continue to blame the media, and Democrats.
Sorta’ like I’ve been saying all along. The mainstream media certainly needs watchdogs. But the high-profile blogs most critical of the MSM are often guilty of the same shortcomings — ideological blinders, jumping to conclusions, piling on — that they criticize Dan Rather & Co. for.
TheAgitator.com

The Schiavo Memo Denouement
Turns out the “Schiavo Memo” originated from the Office of Republican Senator Mel Martinez. Well, that’s barely interesting.
Memo Follies
MEMO FOLLIES….Here’s an honest, nonpartisan question for y’all. Radley Balko wrote this a couple of days ago:So we’ve now learned that the Schiavo memo wasn’t a fake, and did indeed originate from the legal counsel to a Republican staffer. Whatever….
Newsweek’s Careless Reporting
In Newsweek’s “blog watch” section, due to hit the stands today apparently, one of the group blogs that I write for, In the Agora, is mentioned. We would normally welcome the mention in a major publication, but in this case…