<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Caballes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2005/02/01/more-on-caballes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/02/01/more-on-caballes/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: digamma.net - notes</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/02/01/more-on-caballes/#comment-64013</link>
		<dc:creator>digamma.net - notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 03:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5182#comment-64013</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Abortion Rights Are Big and Bright....&lt;/strong&gt;

Clap clap clap clap.... deep in the Fouuuuuurth Amendment!

After demonstrating why considering dog "alerts" can be totally unreasonable as probable cause, the pro-life Radley Balko makes a good point:
Personally, I find it interesting that Justic...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Abortion Rights Are Big and Bright&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Clap clap clap clap&#8230;. deep in the Fouuuuuurth Amendment!</p>
<p>After demonstrating why considering dog &#8220;alerts&#8221; can be totally unreasonable as probable cause, the pro-life Radley Balko makes a good point:<br />
Personally, I find it interesting that Justic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreedomSight</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/02/01/more-on-caballes/#comment-64012</link>
		<dc:creator>FreedomSight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 02:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5182#comment-64012</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sniffing Isn't a "Search" Roundup&lt;/strong&gt;

Last week, I wondered How Do We Overturn the Supreme Court. Following up on the Supreme Court decision which stated that a warrantless search could be constitutional if it was for items prohibited by law. Well, there's been quite a bit more blogging si...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sniffing Isn&#8217;t a &#8220;Search&#8221; Roundup</strong></p>
<p>Last week, I wondered How Do We Overturn the Supreme Court. Following up on the Supreme Court decision which stated that a warrantless search could be constitutional if it was for items prohibited by law. Well, there&#8217;s been quite a bit more blogging si&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Age Of Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2005/02/01/more-on-caballes/#comment-64011</link>
		<dc:creator>The Age Of Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=5182#comment-64011</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Our Robed Masters' dogs&lt;/strong&gt;

The robes masters in the United States Supreme Court said it's ok for a dog to sniff your car without probable cause. Over at The Agitator, he describes why this is so dangerous. Isn't the court supposed to protect our...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Our Robed Masters&#8217; dogs</strong></p>
<p>The robes masters in the United States Supreme Court said it&#8217;s ok for a dog to sniff your car without probable cause. Over at The Agitator, he describes why this is so dangerous. Isn&#8217;t the court supposed to protect our&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
