Comments on: James Broadwater’s Revenge http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/ It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:23:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: funny ringtones http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53431 funny ringtones Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:27:19 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53431 <a href="http://www.special-ringtones.net/mp3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.special-ringtones.net/mp3/</a> ringtones site free. Best free samsung ringtones, Cingular ringtones and more, Ringtones for free. from website . http://www.special-ringtones.net/mp3/ ringtones site free. Best free samsung ringtones, Cingular ringtones and more, Ringtones for free. from website .

]]> By: Dobedobedo http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53429 Dobedobedo Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:43:49 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53429 This stupid missip cracker deserves a beat down. This stupid missip cracker deserves a beat down.

]]> By: Chuck http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53428 Chuck Mon, 02 Aug 2004 15:17:44 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53428 "The other problem with everybody's arguments against this guy is the fact that he is elected. He represents the majority of his constituency, so if he really does he has every right to be where he is." Not only do he lose, but he only got 8 percent of the vote in the republican primary. “The other problem with everybody’s arguments against this guy is the fact that he is elected. He represents the majority of his constituency, so if he really does he has every right to be where he is.”

Not only do he lose, but he only got 8 percent of the vote in the republican primary.

]]> By: Evan Williams http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53427 Evan Williams Mon, 02 Aug 2004 13:41:33 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53427 <i>If he actually believes that the Jews are going to hell, then isn't it preferable that he WOULD say that the Jews are going to hell, instead of lying?</i> I never said he should lie about it; however, his prissy skirting around the issue, after the fact, just goes to show that he knew that this type of shit wouldn't fly with voters. That having been said, just because someone stands behind a belief doesn't mean they should be heralded for having it. I'm sure Hitler stood behind he beliefs quite strongly. <i>"The other problem with everybody's arguments against this guy is the fact that he is elected. He represents the majority of his constituency, so if he really does he has every right to be where he is."</i> Actually, he <b>wasn't</b> elected. He lost. <i>"We live in a republic where the majority is represented. Elected officials are not supposed to be moderates between the majority views and the minority views. That's the way our country is. Maybe the people who send him death threats should send death threats to all the people who support him as well?" We also live in a country where the minority is supposed to be protected form the tyranny of the majority. If The good Mister Broadwater had his way, we'd all be silenced at the point of a gun. America was supposed to be a constitutional republic, not majority mob rule. Just because 50.1% of the people think that any anti-christian viewpoints should be silenced, doesn't mean that the people must accept it. Yes, the majority is "represented" in this country, but that doesn't give the majority the right to force their beliefs on others, using the government as a tool of their oppression. Read <a href="http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/05/06/newman.htm" rel="nofollow">this essay</a> for more on the difference between mob rule and the Constitutional Republic. Regardless, he obviously doesn't have enough supporters, considering that he lost his election. This is not to say that a fundamentalist christian should not be able to hold office, but simply that he/she should not be able to circumvent the constitution, the very thing that seeks to protect the people from the tyranny of the state/majority. </i> If he actually believes that the Jews are going to hell, then isn’t it preferable that he WOULD say that the Jews are going to hell, instead of lying?

I never said he should lie about it; however, his prissy skirting around the issue, after the fact, just goes to show that he knew that this type of shit wouldn’t fly with voters. That having been said, just because someone stands behind a belief doesn’t mean they should be heralded for having it. I’m sure Hitler stood behind he beliefs quite strongly.

“The other problem with everybody’s arguments against this guy is the fact that he is elected. He represents the majority of his constituency, so if he really does he has every right to be where he is.”

Actually, he wasn’t elected. He lost.

“We live in a republic where the majority is represented. Elected officials are not supposed to be moderates between the majority views and the minority views. That’s the way our country is. Maybe the people who send him death threats should send death threats to all the people who support him as well?”

We also live in a country where the minority is supposed to be protected form the tyranny of the majority. If The good Mister Broadwater had his way, we’d all be silenced at the point of a gun. America was supposed to be a constitutional republic, not majority mob rule. Just because 50.1% of the people think that any anti-christian viewpoints should be silenced, doesn’t mean that the people must accept it. Yes, the majority is “represented” in this country, but that doesn’t give the majority the right to force their beliefs on others, using the government as a tool of their oppression. Read this essay for more on the difference between mob rule and the Constitutional Republic.

Regardless, he obviously doesn’t have enough supporters, considering that he lost his election. This is not to say that a fundamentalist christian should not be able to hold office, but simply that he/she should not be able to circumvent the constitution, the very thing that seeks to protect the people from the tyranny of the state/majority.

]]> By: James http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53426 James Mon, 02 Aug 2004 07:26:23 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53426 Evan, If he actually believes that the Jews are going to hell, then isn't it preferable that he WOULD say that the Jews are going to hell, instead of lying? The other problem with everybody's arguments against this guy is the fact that he is elected. He represents the majority of his constituency, so if he really does he has every right to be where he is. If the majority of this country had the same views as him, he would be deserving of being President, no matter what the minority says about him. The fact that the majority of the country disagrees with him means he is in the proper position of power; not that he should not have a voice. We live in a republic where the majority is represented. Elected officials are not supposed to be moderates between the majority views and the minority views. That's the way our country is. Maybe the people who send him death threats should send death threats to all the people who support him as well? Evan,
If he actually believes that the Jews are going to hell, then isn’t it preferable that he WOULD say that the Jews are going to hell, instead of lying?
The other problem with everybody’s arguments against this guy is the fact that he is elected. He represents the majority of his constituency, so if he really does he has every right to be where he is. If the majority of this country had the same views as him, he would be deserving of being President, no matter what the minority says about him. The fact that the majority of the country disagrees with him means he is in the proper position of power; not that he should not have a voice.
We live in a republic where the majority is represented. Elected officials are not supposed to be moderates between the majority views and the minority views. That’s the way our country is. Maybe the people who send him death threats should send death threats to all the people who support him as well?

]]> By: Chuck http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53425 Chuck Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:33:14 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53425 Wow, I sent him an e-mail that really was semi-insulting(although in no way threating obscene or profane) and he actually responded, with one sentence: "It's(Sic: it being internet communication) sent over telephone lines; therefore, it's under federal law." Wow, I sent him an e-mail that really was semi-insulting(although in no way threating obscene or profane) and he actually responded, with one sentence:

“It’s(Sic: it being internet communication) sent over telephone lines; therefore, it’s under federal law.”

]]> By: Arturo Bandini http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53424 Arturo Bandini Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:28:49 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53424 The media hates God. I want complete censorship of the press. Free press be damned! The media hates God. I want complete censorship of the press. Free press be damned!

]]> By: Arturo Bandini http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53423 Arturo Bandini Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:28:24 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53423 The media hates God. I want complete censorshipt of the press. Free press be damned! The media hates God. I want complete censorshipt of the press. Free press be damned!

]]> By: Jason http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53422 Jason Sat, 31 Jul 2004 20:55:02 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53422 Funny that you have no clue that someone could be a "leftist" and love Christians, even be a Christian. Of course I'm sure you've already excommunicated all the Christians from your particular sect... Funny that you have no clue that someone could be a “leftist” and love Christians, even be a Christian. Of course I’m sure you’ve already excommunicated all the Christians from your particular sect…

]]> By: Mike http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53421 Mike Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:33:29 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53421 Ali G is lame. I'm glad Broadwater forwarded those death threats to the authorities. Everyone knows how insanely hateful leftists are towards Christians, and I hope that these people who are threatening him are caught before his family is attacked or killed. Ali G is lame. I’m glad Broadwater forwarded those death threats to the authorities. Everyone knows how insanely hateful leftists are towards Christians, and I hope that these people who are threatening him are caught before his family is attacked or killed.

]]> By: Eric http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53420 Eric Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:21:31 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53420 Here's what I want to know - how can HBO use that footage? Wasn't it fraudulently obtained? Don't they need a consent to show it in the United States, or need to inform him that he was being tricked? Maybe they have a huge release that gives it away, and the guests are stupid enought to just sign it or something, but I am always amazed that HBO can get away with it. I would think that an agreement to appear on a show that you are told is a news program that will be shown in a little CIS Republic is not sufficient to allow use of the same footage on the US on a comedy show that makes fun of people stupid enough to appear. How does this work? Oh yeah, Ali G is funny as hell. Borat is my favorite. Here’s what I want to know – how can HBO use that footage? Wasn’t it fraudulently obtained? Don’t they need a consent to show it in the United States, or need to inform him that he was being tricked?

Maybe they have a huge release that gives it away, and the guests are stupid enought to just sign it or something, but I am always amazed that HBO can get away with it. I would think that an agreement to appear on a show that you are told is a news program that will be shown in a little CIS Republic is not sufficient to allow use of the same footage on the US on a comedy show that makes fun of people stupid enough to appear.

How does this work?

Oh yeah, Ali G is funny as hell. Borat is my favorite.

]]> By: Andrew Ian Dodge http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53419 Andrew Ian Dodge Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:22:56 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53419 I really really hope one Ali G's victims kicks three shades of dung out of him. And more importantly lets hope they keep the film running...that would be worth watching. I really really hope one Ali G’s victims kicks three shades of dung out of him. And more importantly lets hope they keep the film running…that would be worth watching.

]]> By: Richard Succer http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53418 Richard Succer Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:52:44 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53418 I find it quite interesting that most of the posts here decry this type of religious governing, but fail to see the same "I am the Wrath of God" thinking of George W. Bush. If nothing else, at least Kerry will try to keep the invisible man in the sky out of our government. After that, everything else is up for debate. I find it quite interesting that most of the posts here decry this type of religious governing, but fail to see the same “I am the Wrath of God” thinking of George W. Bush. If nothing else, at least Kerry will try to keep the invisible man in the sky out of our government. After that, everything else is up for debate.

]]> By: Matthew http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53417 Matthew Sat, 31 Jul 2004 03:39:12 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53417 No one expects the Mississippi Inquisition... No one expects the Mississippi Inquisition…

]]> By: Lord Duppy http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53416 Lord Duppy Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:47:31 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53416 <i>"The threatening, obscene, and profane ones have been forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission, and official complaints have been lodged."</i> <i>"I believe that the liberal, anti-God media needs to be brought under the strict control of the FCC, and that as soon as possible."</i> Shall we establish an inquisition as well, Mr. Broadwater? “The threatening, obscene, and profane ones have been forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission, and official complaints have been lodged.”

“I believe that the liberal, anti-God media needs to be brought under the strict control of the FCC, and that as soon as possible.”

Shall we establish an inquisition as well, Mr. Broadwater?

]]> By: John H. http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53415 John H. Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:22:54 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53415 "I am a proud friend of Israel [cause the more of them there are, the more room for those of us not burning in hell for all eternity]." John H. narphonax.com/high “I am a proud friend of Israel [cause the more of them there are, the more room for those of us not burning in hell for all eternity].”

John H.
narphonax.com/high

]]> By: Christian http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53414 Christian Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:29:12 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53414 Broadwater will rule like Stalin...If you vote for him he will protect your family, but if you vote against him...he will crush you. Broadwater will rule like Stalin…If you vote for him he will protect your family, but if you vote against him…he will crush you.

]]> By: Christian http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53413 Christian Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:28:47 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53413 Broward will rule like Stalin...If you vote for him he will protect your family, but if you vote against him...he will crush you. Broward will rule like Stalin…If you vote for him he will protect your family, but if you vote against him…he will crush you.

]]> By: Jason http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53412 Jason Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:15:14 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53412 Welcome to politics in Mississippi! We're all for local government when it comes to keeping black boys away from our white girls, and when we want to ignore that inconvenient separation of church and state doctrine. (after all the separation is only necessary if the people in power don't believe as we do). the moment somebody is doing something we don't like, we're all for a strong federal government to take control. Seig Hile! (sic) Welcome to politics in Mississippi! We’re all for local government when it comes to keeping black boys away from our white girls, and when we want to ignore that inconvenient separation of church and state doctrine. (after all the separation is only necessary if the people in power don’t believe as we do). the moment somebody is doing something we don’t like, we’re all for a strong federal government to take control. Seig Hile! (sic)

]]> By: Bernard http://www.theagitator.com/2004/07/30/james-broadwaters-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-53411 Bernard Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:22:35 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=4408#comment-53411 Interesting. I found myself respecting his position right up until that last paragraph. I see nothing wrong with having views based in the bible, nor with looking down on Ali G (local lad though he is), but the idea that blanket censorship would solve his problems gives an alarming window into his psyche. Interesting. I found myself respecting his position right up until that last paragraph. I see nothing wrong with having views based in the bible, nor with looking down on Ali G (local lad though he is), but the idea that blanket censorship would solve his problems gives an alarming window into his psyche.

]]>