No… not really. The only actual point that the word “prove” is attached to is that it’s possible to lose weight while doing that, and that’s precisely what’s happening. And maintaining a healthy lifestyle isn’t the same as saying one is getting progressively healthier, is it? No. It isn’t.

And yes, .pdf is downright bad.

It’s a bit more than trying to show that you can eat at McD’s and not blimp up.

I’d read her diary, except, like other things liberaltarian, she apparently is living in the fantasy world where people want to read a blog that’s in PDF format.

There are a number of things wrong with what you said, so I’ll list a couple and let it go.

1) She is checking cholesterol.

2) More importantly, her point is not to prove that McDonalds is the best way to make yourself a perfectly healthy person. As I understand it, she’s countering the notion that seems to be commonly accepted by viewers of the Morgan mockumentary that his experiment proves that the food is the problem. She’s never claimed that her experiment will prove anything, other than to show that his experiment doesn’t prove anything.

I would never do it, but eating food from only McDonalds doesn’t inherently make one unhealthy. Tripling your caloric intake, making it a point to stop exercising and supersizing every time you’re asked will, though.

Even if she loses weight, that doesn’t mean she’s healthier. She might have ingested more trans fat, sodium, cholesterol, and other good things on the MickeyD diet than on her normal fare. Is that being measured as well?

Talk about taking one for the team. :)

“California could be on its way to becoming the first U.S. state to outlaw smoking in cars or trucks that have children inside.” The bill, which would make lawbreakers of parents transporting their own children, has been introduced by Assemblyman…