«
»

Dan Savage Wins

Thursday, April 8th, 2004

Here’s the top entry when you type “Santorum” into Google.

Digg it |  reddit |  del.icio.us |  Fark

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 8th, 2004 at 6:17 pm by Radley Balko and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

9 Responses to “Dan Savage Wins”

  1. #1 |  MSC |  April 8th, 2004 at 7:09 pm

    Now why in the hell would you do that?

  2. #2 |  Lee |  April 8th, 2004 at 8:08 pm

    Excellent.

    I wonder how long it will stay that way.

  3. #3 |  Jon H |  April 8th, 2004 at 8:09 pm

    Boy, that’s one case when “I’m feeling lucky” definitely isn’t.

  4. #4 |  Jeb |  April 8th, 2004 at 9:01 pm

    Another case of a guy’s words being grossly used against him. Have you read the site? From what I can tell they perpetuate the myth that Santorum equated homosexuality with polygamy, incest, etc. He did not. If anyone cares enough I’ll explain and go back to his actual quote for support, but I have other things I should be doing now.

    That said, the coining of the term was a hilarious idea, though rather crude, and the Google-bomb was a nice way to spread it.

  5. #5 |  Chris Farley |  April 9th, 2004 at 8:07 am

    “nice way to spread it.” HA!

  6. #6 |  Anwah |  April 9th, 2004 at 8:50 am

    Santorum is a right-wing religious fanatic wacko. While not ‘equating’ homosexuality with polygamy, he made the point that if homosexuality was condoned it was a slippery slope and polygamy and beastiality was sure to follow.

  7. #7 |  Ben |  April 9th, 2004 at 9:36 am

    Absolutely hilarious.

  8. #8 |  Jeb |  April 9th, 2004 at 2:47 pm

    Anwah, your ad hominem has little or no point. Was he wrong that a slippery slope is created? Was it wrong of him to point it out? Are “right-wing religious fanatic wacko”s to be treated as less than people?
    Answers, in order: no, no, and no.