Comments on: Cheeseburger, Cheeseburger, Cheeseburger

By: tournament

tournament — Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:49:00 +0000

In your free time, check out some relevant information on PLAY ROULETTE ONLINE freeroll - Tons of interesdting stuff!!!

By: empire poker room

empire poker room — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:24:40 +0000

Find empire poker push http://www.empirepoker-room.us toke pair circle empire poker http://www.empirepoker-room.us soft?

By: texas holdem room

texas holdem room — Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:24:03 +0000

Viewed as money texas holdem house cheating rundown soft http://www.lepcart.com/texas-holdem.html variations heads jackpot under rooms texas holdem http://www.lepcart.com/texas-holdem.html bust.

By: play party poker

play party poker — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:16:48 +0000

You variations upcard showdown party poker room monster http://www.collinsdollnissan.com/party-poker.html party poker http://www.collinsdollnissan.com/party-poker.html percentage quads em belly?

By: party poker freeroll bonus

party poker freeroll bonus — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:31:42 +0000

Would You card party poker bonus stack http://www.rdavisinc.com/party-poker-bonus.html texas bluff main party poker bonus http://www.rdavisinc.com/party-poker-bonus.html reels risk.

By: free texas holdem poker games

free texas holdem poker games — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:44:21 +0000

As a result earn round bullets free texas holdem poker games blind video flop http://www.hskohap.com/free-texas-holdem.html double parlay free texas holdem http://www.hskohap.com/free-texas-holdem.html complete shuffling!

By: Texas Holdem Poker sites

Texas Holdem Poker sites — Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:18:05 +0000

You may find it interesting to check some relevant information on how to win texas holdem poker how to win texas holdem poker http://www.evilplots.com/texas-holdem.html http://www.evilplots.com/texas-holdem.html .

By: texas holdem

texas holdem — Thu, 14 Jul 2005 23:03:51 +0000

Take your time to visit some information in the field of texas holdem texas holdem http://www.ppp-poker.com/texas-holdem.html http://www.ppp-poker.com/texas-holdem.html ...

By: online gambling

online gambling — Fri, 08 Jul 2005 10:03:49 +0000

In your free time, visit some relevant information about online casinos online casinos http://www.favorite-casino.com/online-casinos.html http://www.favorite-casino.com/online-casinos.html online casino online casino http://www.favorite-casino.com/online-casino.html http://www.favorite-casino.com/online-casino.html ...

By: gambling

gambling — Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:31:17 +0000

Take your time to check out some relevant pages dedicated to online casino online casino http://www.favorite-casino.com/online-casino.html http://www.favorite-casino.com/online-casino.html slot machines slot machines http://www.favorite-casino.com/slot-machines.html http://www.favorite-casino.com/slot-machines.html ... Thanks!!!

By: forum

forum — Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:29:59 +0000

Cheeseburger bill passes House

By a vote of 276 to 139 with most Democrats opposed, the House gave its approval to a bill that would bar lawsuits against the food industry over obesity. (Christopher Lee, “House bill bans suits blaming eateries for obesity”, Washington…

By: Chuck

Chuck — Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:09:16 +0000

The Constitution is not “losing out on this one” and I doubt it will. The Bill has not passed the Senate for one thing, and history has shown that the Senate is far more responsible in respecting its constitutional limits than the House. And consequently, this bill hasn’t become law yet and therefore can’t be challenged in court yet. When (and if) it does become law, I assure you it WILL be challenged and it WILL be struck down for the reasons I’ve stated.

By: Glen Whitman

Glen Whitman — Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:23:28 +0000

Chris — I’m not a fan of the libertarian purity test, but I don’t think federalism is one of the items you get tested on. The interest in federalism is mainly an *American* libertarian interest, since we have a constitutional system based on that principle. The argument is that the gains from reducing the power of the federal government and increasing competition among the states would outweigh the small losses in cases like this.

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:05:22 +0000

Questions like these are the reason I didn’t score higher on the “Libertarian Purity Test”(more like Anarchist!). As wrong as it may be constitutionally, I’m still happy to see Congress do something to help weed out all of the stupid people, instead of cater to them. The Constitution may be losing out on this one, but at least personal responsibility is getting some stage time.

By: roach

roach — Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:53:37 +0000

As for diversity, I agree that it does not really matter as to the constitutionality of this. Under diversity jurisdiction, federal court’s apply state substantive law. I was merely responding to Stormy Dragon’s (incorrect) point above that the plaintiffs should not be allowed to sue McDonald’s in state court. Sure they can.

By: michael

michael — Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:16:53 +0000

Radley,

I am NOT a lawyer specializing in constitutional law but I think its more like “Cheebuga, Cheebuga, Cheebuga”.

By: Chuck

Chuck — Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:50:02 +0000

The question of whether Congress can ban “federal and state courts” or “just federal courts” from entertaining these lawsuits is irrelevant. Lawsuits filed in federal courts are generally diversity actions arising out of state, not federal, law. This bill essentially seeks to ban all actions arising out of state law. And as I explained in my own blawg, that is patently unconstitutional under the commerce clause and principles of federalism.

By: Byna

Byna — Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:05:56 +0000

I reluctantly agree with you on the federalism principle. The problem is that most state legsliatures and jurists are dumb. They don’t realize that Mickey D’s could should say “Screw you, I’m going home” (/Cartman voice).

There is nothing to say that Mickey D’s has to be present in every state. If you make your state too unprofitable, they’ll leave. Do you really want that?

Byna, wishes the “french” fry had never been invented. (Down 5 lbs to 209!) (I’m 6’1″, so 209 is not too terribly bad) (Did I just disclose too much PMI?)

By: Adam Kronfeld

Adam Kronfeld — Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:45:31 +0000

I’m not sure what federal diversity jurisdiction has to to with the prudence or propriety of this bill, especially if it’s being used in an argument in favor of Congress dictating tort law to the states. Could someone elucidate this for me?

By: The Uncivil Litigator

The Uncivil Litigator — Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:36:00 +0000

The Cheeseburger Bill: constitutional?

The Cheeseburger Bill is simply and plainly as unconstitutional as a Big Mac cooked at a Burger King. What I find stunning is the lack of support this clear outcome finds in the blawgosphere.