Disinfopedia

Monday, February 23rd, 2004

(Disclaimer: Yes, I work for Cato. The following post is my own opinion, and no one else’s. Nor should it be construed to be any sort of “official” position of Cato.)

Read this Will Wilkinson post about Disinfopedia, a community website that purports to gather the information submitted by users on the “real” motivations of think tanks and interest groups.

The Cato Institute entry is absurd. Despite this collection of Cato work on civil liberties, the Disinfo page says:

Sometimes, howeover, it has proven willing to set aside its libertarian principles – such as supporting a Bush administration moves to restrict civil liberties as part of the â??war on terror.â? In 2002, a Cato news release endorsed new Justice Department guidelines giving greater latitude to FBI agents to monitor Internet sites, libraries and religious institutions. “As reported in the press, the new FBI surveillance guidelines present no serious problems,” declared Cato legal affairs analyst Roger Pilon, a former Reagan administration official who writes frequent Cato commentaries defending property rights and opposing affirmative action that have appeared in publications such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and the Los Angeles Times. Pilon added that “law enforcement monitoring of public places is simply good, pro-active police work that violates the rights of no one.”

From that, you might think that Cato’s been cheerleading the White House every step of the way in the civil liberties-terror debate. Never mind that that Pilon release is pretty much the only time Cato has come down with the White House on a contentious issue involving civil liberties.

I added the following line to the entry at 7:30pm tonight:

Of course, for that one release by Pilon, Cato scholars such as Robert Levy and Timothy Lynch had railed against the Bush administration for its civil liberties record on, for example, the Padilla case, military tribunals, national ID cards, the creeping militarization of domestic law enforcement, border patrol, the drug war, grand jury abuse, the PATRIOT Act, federal surveilance of ordinary Americans, operation TIPS, and mandatory vaccinations against potential bioterror threats.

We’ll see how much time passes before it gets edited out.

Digg it |  reddit |  del.icio.us |  Fark

5 Responses to “Disinfopedia”

  1. #1 |  Lee | 

    Actually I have to agree with the website. Cato did set aside its libertarian principles when it supported the Bush administration.

    I think your more upset on getting called on the issue.

  2. #2 |  Brian Hawkins | 

    Still there at 11:10 EST.

  3. #3 |  The Lonewacko Blog | 

    I edited their page on the Ford Foundation (see the ‘External Links’ section.)

    My set of links will probably have a shorter half-time.

    Say, did you know that Ken “Kenny Boy” Lay served on the board of the Heinz Foundation? Did you know they kept him on after the scandal, even apologizing away his presence?

  4. #4 |  DamnHippies | 

    Frankly, I can’t see anything wrong with monitoring Internet sites. I don’t see how it is against Libertarian principles to condone such action.

    They are in the public arena, for ready public access.

    Denying the authorities to monitor a web site is like denying the police from keeping watch at a playground.

  5. #5 |  Jason | 

    Still there at 12:51 EST, 2/25/04.