In 8 years if Bush’s agenda fails us, I will be man enough to conceed to a more liberatarian viewpoint, but untill then, BUSH 2004!

What you are proposing is analogous to the old policy of containment against Saddam & Sons.

It doesn’t solve our government’s fundamental problem — which stems from the Mutually Assured Dumbness that has resulted from a political equivalent to the Cold War.

We have two super-parties, of approximately equal strength, that are like two trees that have fallen against each other — where the very act of pushing against the other supports both, letting them hold the ground they have and keep new growth out.

Rather than propose gridlock, this independent proposes that we cut down the tree with the weaker trunk, and see both fall.

From a philosophical and policy standpoint, the Democratic Party is the weaker tree. Totally discredit it — by not just helping the GOP take the presidency, but helping them take down the Democratic Congressional contingent — and you will establish something that the American people will not sustain; total dominance by one party.

Then, Americans will finally consider other alternatives to the two major parties — because it will diminish the risk that the vote for an alternative will result in electing the greater of two evils.

They will also be prodded into consideration of their role in perpetuating the Mutually Assured Dumbness — and just maybe start THINKING instead of feeling when it comes to how our nation conducts its business.

Here is an article found on FOX News that gives some pretty interesting reasons for voting for Dean (or any other Democratic candidate) It was written by Radley Balko, of The Agitator and is a freelance writer for FOX News….

Here is an article found on FOX News that gives some pretty interesting reasons for voting for Dean (or any other Democratic candidate) It was written by Radley Balko, of The Agitator and is a freelance writer for FOX News….