Comments on: For the Children http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/ It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:26:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: viagra online http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36661 viagra online Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:21:29 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36661 <a href="http://viagra-rx.cl.nu/" rel="nofollow">viagra</a> ViaT8898111-01-01-22 viagra ViaT8898111-01-01-22

]]> By: xenical online http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36660 xenical online Tue, 13 Jun 2006 22:25:14 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36660 <a href="http://www.blogcity.com/wass/" rel="nofollow">buy xenical</a> Xen-770009122-345566 buy xenical Xen-770009122-345566

]]> By: bonus http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36659 bonus Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:13:38 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36659 grouped Hungary!Yoknapatawpha bedstead.wordily.Joel mishap,reactivity!lions despaired?<a href="http://www.casinos4spain.com/pai-gow-poker.html" rel="nofollow"> tournament </a> - Tons of interesdting stuff!!! grouped Hungary!Yoknapatawpha bedstead.wordily.Joel mishap,reactivity!lions despaired? tournament – Tons of interesdting stuff!!!

]]> By: Joshua Claybourn's Domain http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36665 Joshua Claybourn's Domain Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:30:49 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36665 <strong>For the Children</strong> I'm going to join with Balta in asking why the hell this didn't get press coverage:The U.S. National Debt has For the Children

I’m going to join with Balta in asking why the hell this didn’t get press coverage:The U.S. National Debt has

]]> By: Pat Curley http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36658 Pat Curley Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:06:03 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36658 First of all, it should be obvious that some of the biggest beneficiaries of the war on terror will be our children, so why the heck should they not pay some of the cost? Second, as usual, it will be the children who grow up to be wealthy who will pay the lion's share of the debt. Third, there are NOT trillion dollar deficits. $500 billion is the figure that Mad How likes to cite; unless you think he's understating things? First of all, it should be obvious that some of the biggest beneficiaries of the war on terror will be our children, so why the heck should they not pay some of the cost?

Second, as usual, it will be the children who grow up to be wealthy who will pay the lion’s share of the debt.

Third, there are NOT trillion dollar deficits. $500 billion is the figure that Mad How likes to cite; unless you think he’s understating things?

]]> By: Mark Fulwiler http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36657 Mark Fulwiler Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:42:23 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36657 I'm not for deficit spending, but don't "our" children inherit government bonds (an asset)as well as the debt (a liability)? All government spending really has to come out of ~current~ production. Government borrowing simply means less money in the private sector NOW and the government transfers money around in the future. I’m not for deficit spending, but don’t “our” children inherit government bonds (an asset)as well as the debt (a liability)? All government spending really has to come out of ~current~ production. Government borrowing simply means less money in the private sector NOW and the government transfers money around in the future.

]]> By: wunder http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36656 wunder Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:03:22 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36656 the thing about this ad, though, is that if a demo gets into office, the repubs can just pull it out and re-air. it's all the same @$#*&%^%. the thing about this ad, though, is that if a demo gets into office, the repubs can just pull it out and re-air. it’s all the same @$#*&%^%.

]]> By: Dan for Bush http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36655 Dan for Bush Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:47:52 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36655 yeah, the ads are funny... its funny how full of unmitigated lies and unfounded, unbacked allegations and conspiracy theories they are these folks just make claims, they never have any data or written proof to back up their statements, which ar all just spin yeah, the ads are funny…

its funny how full of unmitigated lies and unfounded, unbacked allegations and conspiracy theories they are

these folks just make claims, they never have any data or written proof to back up their statements, which ar all just spin

]]> By: Rocketman http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36654 Rocketman Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:37:12 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36654 I loved the funny one at the update link. You GOTTA LOVE the part where he "makes a joke of the UN" that will gets my (and others)vote for Bush. I loved the funny one at the update link. You GOTTA LOVE the part where he “makes a joke of the UN” that will gets my (and others)vote for Bush.

]]> By: Ms. Dani http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36653 Ms. Dani Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:12:09 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36653 That's all they got? Bring it on. That’s all they got? Bring it on.

]]> By: Lonewacko http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36652 Lonewacko Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:54:39 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36652 Cuenca's ad exploited dead soldiers for political gain, as did one of the other finalists. Maybe he had pangs of guilt, although I doubt not. I summarized the 15 finalists <a href="http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/000893.html#000893" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Strangely enough, the clips are numbered 1 to 17, and #2 and #16 are missing from the series. What was in the place of #2 and #16? It's probably just a coincidence that two of the clips were pulled. Cuenca’s ad exploited dead soldiers for political gain, as did one of the other finalists. Maybe he had pangs of guilt, although I doubt not.

I summarized the 15 finalists here. Strangely enough, the clips are numbered 1 to 17, and #2 and #16 are missing from the series.

What was in the place of #2 and #16? It’s probably just a coincidence that two of the clips were pulled.

]]> By: Joshua Claybourn's Domain http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36664 Joshua Claybourn's Domain Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:17:07 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36664 <strong>For the Children</strong> I'm going to join with Balta in asking why the hell this didn't get press coverage:The U.S. National Debt has For the Children

I’m going to join with Balta in asking why the hell this didn’t get press coverage:The U.S. National Debt has

]]> By: Jeremy Scharlack's Blog http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36663 Jeremy Scharlack's Blog Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:07:54 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36663 <strong>We have a winner</strong> ... in the Bush in :30 contest: Child's Play. The writer was unsurprisingly an advertising creative. Charlie Fisher is the creative director at Leo Barnett in Copenhagen (Thanks to adland for the link), although he is originally from Denver. As... We have a winner

… in the Bush in :30 contest: Child’s Play. The writer was unsurprisingly an advertising creative. Charlie Fisher is the creative director at Leo Barnett in Copenhagen (Thanks to adland for the link), although he is originally from Denver. As…

]]> By: Jeremy Scharlack's Blog http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36662 Jeremy Scharlack's Blog Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:06:10 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36662 <strong>We have a winner</strong> ... in the Bush in :30 contest: Child's Play. The writer was unsurprisingly an advertising creative. Charlie Fisher is the creative director at Leo Barnett in Copenhagen (Thanks to adland for the link), although he is originally from Denver. As... We have a winner

… in the Bush in :30 contest: Child’s Play. The writer was unsurprisingly an advertising creative. Charlie Fisher is the creative director at Leo Barnett in Copenhagen (Thanks to adland for the link), although he is originally from Denver. As…

]]> By: Joe Sims http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36651 Joe Sims Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:52:15 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36651 my bad, I meant "Mike", not "Mark"... my bad, I meant “Mike”, not “Mark”…

]]> By: Joe Sims http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36650 Joe Sims Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:50:54 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36650 Interesting article in this week's <i>Pitch</i>, Kansas City's local alternative paper. It tells the tale of a Mark Cuenca, a former KU journalism instructor who pulled his ad from the MoveOn contest, even though it was a top 15 finalist. Here's the link, if anyone is interested: <a href="http://www.pitch.com/issues/2004-01-15/stline.html/1/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pitch.com/issues/2004-01-15/stline.html/1/index.html</a> Interesting article in this week’s Pitch, Kansas City’s local alternative paper. It tells the tale of a Mark Cuenca, a former KU journalism instructor who pulled his ad from the MoveOn contest, even though it was a top 15 finalist.

Here’s the link, if anyone is interested:

http://www.pitch.com/issues/2004-01-15/stline.html/1/index.html

]]> By: PJ Doland http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36649 PJ Doland Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:20:05 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36649 I have an overwhelming desire to re-edit the ad: "Guess who's going to have to work to pay for your social security benefits?" I have an overwhelming desire to re-edit the ad:

“Guess who’s going to have to work to pay for your social security benefits?”

]]> By: new girl http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36648 new girl Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:13:08 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36648 I actually saw this on the Move On website last night. They are trying to raise enough money to air the ad during the Superbowl, which would be intersting to say the least. I actually saw this on the Move On website last night. They are trying to raise enough money to air the ad during the Superbowl, which would be intersting to say the least.

]]> By: David http://www.theagitator.com/2004/01/14/for-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-36647 David Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:39:24 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3583#comment-36647 As someome remarked in another blog, the problem with the ad is it's only effective for the democrats if they're going to spell out where the trillion dollars is coming from: from program cuts or increased taxation. Obviously from the conservative POV, the desired outcome would be from the first; from the Demo point, it's very unlike you're going to hear big calls for spending cuts. As someome remarked in another blog, the problem with the ad is it’s only effective for the democrats if they’re going to spell out where the trillion dollars is coming from: from program cuts or increased taxation. Obviously from the conservative POV, the desired outcome would be from the first; from the Demo point, it’s very unlike you’re going to hear big calls for spending cuts.

]]>