<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magic Trick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: milf hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34177</link>
		<dc:creator>milf hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34177</guid>
		<description>nice work !

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hilton.big3sex.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.hilton.big3sex.com/&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://paris--hilton.xamateur-movies.com/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;paris  hilton&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice work !</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hilton.big3sex.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hilton.big3sex.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://paris--hilton.xamateur-movies.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">paris  hilton</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34176</link>
		<dc:creator>moo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2003 04:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34176</guid>
		<description>oh, by the way, has he found Osama yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, by the way, has he found Osama yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34175</link>
		<dc:creator>moo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34175</guid>
		<description>You republicans need to develop a sense of humor:  life is pretty hard going with such thin skins.

Butch up, cupcakes.

moo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You republicans need to develop a sense of humor:  life is pretty hard going with such thin skins.</p>
<p>Butch up, cupcakes.</p>
<p>moo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politics Unusual: The Bush Files</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34179</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics Unusual: The Bush Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2003 03:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34179</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The People have spoken..&lt;/strong&gt;

Go to Google, type &#8220;miserable failure&#8221;, click &#8220;I&#8217;m feeling lucky&#8221;. Report back with your results. This is what I got. I got this from The Agitator. Thanks for the laugh. Republicans, repeat after me: &#8220;its only a joke...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The People have spoken..</strong></p>
<p>Go to Google, type &#8220;miserable failure&#8221;, click &#8220;I&#8217;m feeling lucky&#8221;. Report back with your results. This is what I got. I got this from The Agitator. Thanks for the laugh. Republicans, repeat after me: &#8220;its only a joke&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scared Stiff</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34174</link>
		<dc:creator>Scared Stiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 03:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34174</guid>
		<description>My blog explains the whole Iraq thing, and much of GWB&#039;s motivation.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://focusonthetruth.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://focusonthetruth.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My blog explains the whole Iraq thing, and much of GWB&#8217;s motivation.</p>
<p><a href="http://focusonthetruth.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://focusonthetruth.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Say Anything</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34178</link>
		<dc:creator>Say Anything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 22:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34178</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What&#039;s Going On With This?&lt;/strong&gt;

I got this from the Agitator. Go to Google. Type in this phrase: &quot;miserable failure&quot; Now hit the &quot;I Feel Lucky Button.&quot; Notice that it will immediately take you to the biography of President George W. Bush at the White</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What&#8217;s Going On With This?</strong></p>
<p>I got this from the Agitator. Go to Google. Type in this phrase: &#8220;miserable failure&#8221; Now hit the &#8220;I Feel Lucky Button.&#8221; Notice that it will immediately take you to the biography of President George W. Bush at the White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chad</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34173</link>
		<dc:creator>chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34173</guid>
		<description>Roger,
I see your point.

My opinion, then, is that I think of him as a miserable failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,<br />
I see your point.</p>
<p>My opinion, then, is that I think of him as a miserable failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34172</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34172</guid>
		<description>Chad -

Now that I see Lew Rockwell also considers GWB a failure, then it must no longer be an opinion.  It is now a documented fact.

C&#039;mon, man - You&#039;ve missed the point alltogether.  All anyone has been saying is that whether or not GWB is a failure depends on perspective.  Finding someone else who shares your opinion doesn&#039;t make it a truth.  All it does is prove that you aren&#039;t alone in your opinion.

&quot;Bush promised us a few things. I think we reserve the right to grade him on the failure to deliver on those promises&quot;

Nobody has suggested that you shouldn&#039;t have that right.  You&#039;ve made your opinion quite clearly.  Your mistake was in declaring your opinion to be the definitive truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad -</p>
<p>Now that I see Lew Rockwell also considers GWB a failure, then it must no longer be an opinion.  It is now a documented fact.</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, man &#8211; You&#8217;ve missed the point alltogether.  All anyone has been saying is that whether or not GWB is a failure depends on perspective.  Finding someone else who shares your opinion doesn&#8217;t make it a truth.  All it does is prove that you aren&#8217;t alone in your opinion.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bush promised us a few things. I think we reserve the right to grade him on the failure to deliver on those promises&#8221;</p>
<p>Nobody has suggested that you shouldn&#8217;t have that right.  You&#8217;ve made your opinion quite clearly.  Your mistake was in declaring your opinion to be the definitive truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Dani</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34171</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34171</guid>
		<description>&quot;Some people think it is fair to disproportionately tax the rich in an attempt to support the poor, and others...&quot;

You have just defined socialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some people think it is fair to disproportionately tax the rich in an attempt to support the poor, and others&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You have just defined socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34170</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34170</guid>
		<description>Concerning GWB (or we can just overarchingly call it GOP) failures:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=463&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=463&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;For all its rhetoric about free trade and free enterprise, you can always count on the Republican Party to back a protectionist plan if it is supported by a big business with good connections. The Bush administration has followed in the footsteps of the previous Bush administration and even the Reagan administrationâ??and most famously the Hoover administrationâ??in violating its supposed principles to help its friends. The costs of all of this are incalculable, and the American consumer is paying them. American retailers and wholesalers are paying them as well. This drains resources that could be going to boosting prospects for the US economy.&quot;
- Lew Rockwell



and this one on big government GOP &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul145.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul145.html&lt;/a&gt; 

You see, if one is to call oneself a Republican, and if the person in particular is the President of the US, you would think that person would adhere to the principles that guide the overall philosophies of the party. Sure there will be some who are more intense about abortion or any other high octane social topic, but overall, our current administration can be seen as a failure in terms of GOP standards. So, as I said, it can be viewed as failure.

I am unsure why Clinton&#039;s name is always invoked when we criticize Bush. (&quot;Well Clinton did this....and Clinton didn&#039;t do that....&quot;) Sheesh. What is up with that? We all know Clinton screwed up in a lot of ways. We talk about that also. However, Bush promised us a few things. I think we reserve the right to grade him on the failure to deliver on those promises. In fact, it is our duty to do so.

Regarding the deaths of soldiers in Iraq, I will only say that I find it very sad. I never said the families were not notified. I am a veteran and now work as a DoD civilian. I find it completely unforgivable that our President has decided he must hide his war dead. These fine soldiers, airmen, marines, and seamen deserve their country&#039;s recognition. Bush has made it political and therefore very cynical to hide the war dead. If it shows failure, he will have none of it.

I said he was a success in his kicking of his cocaine habit and alcoholism. I gave him credit for that. Try not twist my words too much.


Signed,
Chad, the non-atheist, mostly pagan, sometimes pessimistic, sometimes optimistic disliker of the lying Shrub and his merry band of thugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning GWB (or we can just overarchingly call it GOP) failures:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=463" rel="nofollow">http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=463</a></p>
<p>&#8220;For all its rhetoric about free trade and free enterprise, you can always count on the Republican Party to back a protectionist plan if it is supported by a big business with good connections. The Bush administration has followed in the footsteps of the previous Bush administration and even the Reagan administrationâ??and most famously the Hoover administrationâ??in violating its supposed principles to help its friends. The costs of all of this are incalculable, and the American consumer is paying them. American retailers and wholesalers are paying them as well. This drains resources that could be going to boosting prospects for the US economy.&#8221;<br />
- Lew Rockwell</p>
<p>and this one on big government GOP <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul145.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul145.html</a> </p>
<p>You see, if one is to call oneself a Republican, and if the person in particular is the President of the US, you would think that person would adhere to the principles that guide the overall philosophies of the party. Sure there will be some who are more intense about abortion or any other high octane social topic, but overall, our current administration can be seen as a failure in terms of GOP standards. So, as I said, it can be viewed as failure.</p>
<p>I am unsure why Clinton&#8217;s name is always invoked when we criticize Bush. (&#8220;Well Clinton did this&#8230;.and Clinton didn&#8217;t do that&#8230;.&#8221;) Sheesh. What is up with that? We all know Clinton screwed up in a lot of ways. We talk about that also. However, Bush promised us a few things. I think we reserve the right to grade him on the failure to deliver on those promises. In fact, it is our duty to do so.</p>
<p>Regarding the deaths of soldiers in Iraq, I will only say that I find it very sad. I never said the families were not notified. I am a veteran and now work as a DoD civilian. I find it completely unforgivable that our President has decided he must hide his war dead. These fine soldiers, airmen, marines, and seamen deserve their country&#8217;s recognition. Bush has made it political and therefore very cynical to hide the war dead. If it shows failure, he will have none of it.</p>
<p>I said he was a success in his kicking of his cocaine habit and alcoholism. I gave him credit for that. Try not twist my words too much.</p>
<p>Signed,<br />
Chad, the non-atheist, mostly pagan, sometimes pessimistic, sometimes optimistic disliker of the lying Shrub and his merry band of thugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34169</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34169</guid>
		<description>DougB -

We don&#039;t seriously have to define a &quot;tired old line&quot; for you, do we?

The old, &quot;Bush&#039;s tax cuts were directed at the rich&quot; has been refuted sufficiently here as well as countless other places, so I see no need to re-state it yet again.

If you don&#039;t (or won&#039;t) understand it by now, I imagine you never will.  Some people think it is fair to disproportionately tax the rich in an attempt to support the poor, and others, including me, don&#039;t.

I am employed by a rich man, and I work hard to make him even richer.  It&#039;s a strange phenomenon, but the more money he has, the more I seem to have.  Go figure.

Regarding the &quot;miserable failure&quot; line...

What candidate has ever felt otherwise about the current President?  Calling the president a &quot;miserable failure&quot;, and passing it off as Fact is standard procedure.  THAT is why it is both tired and old.

Having an opinion about whether or not Bush is a &quot;miserable failure&quot; is fine.  Just don&#039;t try to spread an undefinable (universally) and therefore entirely subjective opinion as The Truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DougB -</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t seriously have to define a &#8220;tired old line&#8221; for you, do we?</p>
<p>The old, &#8220;Bush&#8217;s tax cuts were directed at the rich&#8221; has been refuted sufficiently here as well as countless other places, so I see no need to re-state it yet again.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t (or won&#8217;t) understand it by now, I imagine you never will.  Some people think it is fair to disproportionately tax the rich in an attempt to support the poor, and others, including me, don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I am employed by a rich man, and I work hard to make him even richer.  It&#8217;s a strange phenomenon, but the more money he has, the more I seem to have.  Go figure.</p>
<p>Regarding the &#8220;miserable failure&#8221; line&#8230;</p>
<p>What candidate has ever felt otherwise about the current President?  Calling the president a &#8220;miserable failure&#8221;, and passing it off as Fact is standard procedure.  THAT is why it is both tired and old.</p>
<p>Having an opinion about whether or not Bush is a &#8220;miserable failure&#8221; is fine.  Just don&#8217;t try to spread an undefinable (universally) and therefore entirely subjective opinion as The Truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank N</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34168</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34168</guid>
		<description>So three Monkeys Butlers walk into a bar, the first one says to the bartender...ahh forget it, the Bush arguement is much more enjoyable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So three Monkeys Butlers walk into a bar, the first one says to the bartender&#8230;ahh forget it, the Bush arguement is much more enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougB</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34167</link>
		<dc:creator>DougB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34167</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the standard response of &quot;That tired old line.&quot; It&#039;s not even a denial. 

At least have some argument in your arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the standard response of &#8220;That tired old line.&#8221; It&#8217;s not even a denial. </p>
<p>At least have some argument in your arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Dani</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34166</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34166</guid>
		<description>Wallster - Try and imagine this, to someone who makes $30k annually, barely supporting his family, and receives a $400 rebate for each child, it was a huge and relevant tax cut, and he doesn&#039;t give a crap what the rich got. He just knows that he was able to buy his kids new school clothes and supplies without having to starve himself to do it.

You seem a little arrogant calling that &quot;scraps&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallster &#8211; Try and imagine this, to someone who makes $30k annually, barely supporting his family, and receives a $400 rebate for each child, it was a huge and relevant tax cut, and he doesn&#8217;t give a crap what the rich got. He just knows that he was able to buy his kids new school clothes and supplies without having to starve himself to do it.</p>
<p>You seem a little arrogant calling that &#8220;scraps&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34165</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 14:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34165</guid>
		<description>Wallster -

A &quot;Bush apologist&quot;?  All I did was point out Chad&#039;s confusion of opinion and truth.

&quot;Bush&#039;s tax cut was directed at the rich. Yes, everybody got a few scraps, so disingenous people like yourself and Bush can claim it was directed to everybody&quot;

Let&#039;s see...  Everyone got a tax cut, with a larger percentage cut going to those with smaller incomes.  Further, the rebate checks were the same for everybody, making them disproportionately weighted again toward lower wage earners.  Both, of course are in terms of percentage cuts, a concept which contemporary liberals refuse to grasp.

And you call ME disingenous?  You guys ARE always good for a laugh.

(for the record, I am less than pleased with several key things Bush has done so far (i.e. steel tariffs, campaign finance reform, really BIG spending), but tax cuts are not one of them)

Benny M -

&quot;Come on Republicans, you&#039;ve got the White House, the legislature, and ostensibly the judiciary, yet you still can&#039;t have a goodheared laugh...&quot;

I love a good laugh, but as a prerequisite, the subject matter must actually be funny.  This is just tired, worn-out material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallster -</p>
<p>A &#8220;Bush apologist&#8221;?  All I did was point out Chad&#8217;s confusion of opinion and truth.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bush&#8217;s tax cut was directed at the rich. Yes, everybody got a few scraps, so disingenous people like yourself and Bush can claim it was directed to everybody&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230;  Everyone got a tax cut, with a larger percentage cut going to those with smaller incomes.  Further, the rebate checks were the same for everybody, making them disproportionately weighted again toward lower wage earners.  Both, of course are in terms of percentage cuts, a concept which contemporary liberals refuse to grasp.</p>
<p>And you call ME disingenous?  You guys ARE always good for a laugh.</p>
<p>(for the record, I am less than pleased with several key things Bush has done so far (i.e. steel tariffs, campaign finance reform, really BIG spending), but tax cuts are not one of them)</p>
<p>Benny M -</p>
<p>&#8220;Come on Republicans, you&#8217;ve got the White House, the legislature, and ostensibly the judiciary, yet you still can&#8217;t have a goodheared laugh&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I love a good laugh, but as a prerequisite, the subject matter must actually be funny.  This is just tired, worn-out material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkey boy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34164</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkey boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34164</guid>
		<description>Oh boy, there goes that &quot;tax cuts were for the rich&quot; tired old line. 

Excuse me, but the rich pay all the fucking taxes. Stands to reason that they get some back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, there goes that &#8220;tax cuts were for the rich&#8221; tired old line. </p>
<p>Excuse me, but the rich pay all the fucking taxes. Stands to reason that they get some back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wade</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34163</link>
		<dc:creator>wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34163</guid>
		<description>Serpent says Mr Bush is......
&quot;the president of the most powerful empire the world has ever seen&quot;.  

I bet Genghis Khan would kick his lily-white ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serpent says Mr Bush is&#8230;&#8230;<br />
&#8220;the president of the most powerful empire the world has ever seen&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I bet Genghis Khan would kick his lily-white ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34162</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34162</guid>
		<description>A google bomb. It goes to the official website of the President? Knowing Bush&#039;s sense of humor, he did this himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A google bomb. It goes to the official website of the President? Knowing Bush&#8217;s sense of humor, he did this himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny M</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34161</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 00:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34161</guid>
		<description>ok, all i can say is that was hilarious.  So were most of the comments except for the usual decent into the &quot;my party&#039;s better than yours&quot; debate.  Come on Republicans, you&#039;ve got the White House, the legislature, and ostensibly the judiciary, yet you still can&#039;t have a goodheared laugh, or let anyone else get a way with a jab at your president.  Oh yeah, you tried to impeach Clinton when he did that whole cigar thing w/Monica but Bush might have lied about big &quot;missiles&quot; and you&#039;ll have none of it.
A siimlar google bomb directed searchers for &quot;weapons of mass destruction&quot; to a rendition of a &quot;404: file not found&quot; page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, all i can say is that was hilarious.  So were most of the comments except for the usual decent into the &#8220;my party&#8217;s better than yours&#8221; debate.  Come on Republicans, you&#8217;ve got the White House, the legislature, and ostensibly the judiciary, yet you still can&#8217;t have a goodheared laugh, or let anyone else get a way with a jab at your president.  Oh yeah, you tried to impeach Clinton when he did that whole cigar thing w/Monica but Bush might have lied about big &#8220;missiles&#8221; and you&#8217;ll have none of it.<br />
A siimlar google bomb directed searchers for &#8220;weapons of mass destruction&#8221; to a rendition of a &#8220;404: file not found&#8221; page</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/12/03/magic-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-34160</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 00:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3434#comment-34160</guid>
		<description>&gt; Bush is attempting to deprogressivize
&gt; the tax code

And that&#039;s a problem because?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Bush is attempting to deprogressivize<br />
> the tax code</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s a problem because?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

