<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Droll by Droll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Curmudgeonly Clerk</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32305</link>
		<dc:creator>The Curmudgeonly Clerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2003 20:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32305</guid>
		<description>I just noticed that we both had &lt;a href="http://www.curmudgeonlyclerk.com/weblog/archives/2003_10.html#000561" rel="nofollow"&gt;the same reaction&lt;/a&gt; to Reynolds's post.  &lt;i&gt;Day By Day&lt;/i&gt; is the &lt;i&gt;Doonesbury&lt;/i&gt; of the Right, and just as insufferably unfunny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed that we both had <a href="http://www.curmudgeonlyclerk.com/weblog/archives/2003_10.html#000561" rel="nofollow">the same reaction</a> to Reynolds&#8217;s post.  <i>Day By Day</i> is the <i>Doonesbury</i> of the Right, and just as insufferably unfunny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Curmudgeonly Clerk</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32306</link>
		<dc:creator>The Curmudgeonly Clerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2003 20:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32306</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Day By Day&lt;/strong&gt;

Glenn Reynolds notes that Chris Muir's Day By Day "is starting to get the attention it deserves" and points to...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Day By Day</strong></p>
<p>Glenn Reynolds notes that Chris Muir&#8217;s Day By Day &#8220;is starting to get the attention it deserves&#8221; and points to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeV</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32304</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32304</guid>
		<description>The comparison to Boondocks is on point.  You might also mention Mallard Fillmore (and Tom Tomorrow, too, to keep things bipartisan).  

  What Doonesbury has and Bloom County had, and these strips don't is, are real characters and really inventive humor. 

 I liked Doonesbury and Bloom County before I knew much anything about politics--it would be impossible for that to happen with a strip like Day by Day or Boondocks. There's just not enough comic meat there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comparison to Boondocks is on point.  You might also mention Mallard Fillmore (and Tom Tomorrow, too, to keep things bipartisan).  </p>
<p>  What Doonesbury has and Bloom County had, and these strips don&#8217;t is, are real characters and really inventive humor. </p>
<p> I liked Doonesbury and Bloom County before I knew much anything about politics&#8211;it would be impossible for that to happen with a strip like Day by Day or Boondocks. There&#8217;s just not enough comic meat there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric the .5b</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32303</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric the .5b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2003 02:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32303</guid>
		<description>...And I like his style of drawing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;And I like his style of drawing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric the .5b</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32302</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric the .5b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2003 02:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32302</guid>
		<description>Taste is individual, but I usually get a grin out of Day by Day, often chuckles, and every week or so a belly-laugh.  That puts it measurably above average for daily strips, for me.  And Muir can actually make non-partisan jokes (the ones I share with my politics-averse friends), unlike almost every partisan cartoonist out there: &lt;a href="http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/Cartoons/10-19-2003.gif" rel="nofollow"&gt;10/19&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/Cartoons/10-03-2003.gif" rel="nofollow"&gt;10/3&lt;/a&gt;, and my favorite this month, &lt;a href="http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/Cartoons/10-16-2003.gif" rel="nofollow"&gt;10/16&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taste is individual, but I usually get a grin out of Day by Day, often chuckles, and every week or so a belly-laugh.  That puts it measurably above average for daily strips, for me.  And Muir can actually make non-partisan jokes (the ones I share with my politics-averse friends), unlike almost every partisan cartoonist out there: <a href="http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/Cartoons/10-19-2003.gif" rel="nofollow">10/19</a>, <a href="http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/Cartoons/10-03-2003.gif" rel="nofollow">10/3</a>, and my favorite this month, <a href="http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/Cartoons/10-16-2003.gif" rel="nofollow">10/16</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edd</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32301</link>
		<dc:creator>Edd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 03:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32301</guid>
		<description>Some Non Sequitur strips with a libertarian bent:

&lt;a href="http://www.essex1.com/people/thompsn/pics/ns/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.essex1.com/people/thompsn/pics/ns/&lt;/a&gt;

Some of the nonpolitical strips can be wickedly funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some Non Sequitur strips with a libertarian bent:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.essex1.com/people/thompsn/pics/ns/" rel="nofollow">http://www.essex1.com/people/thompsn/pics/ns/</a></p>
<p>Some of the nonpolitical strips can be wickedly funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32300</guid>
		<description>Comic strips should be funny - I totally agree with that - except, perhaps, "For Better or Worse."  But then I don't think the writer expects us to find them funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comic strips should be funny - I totally agree with that - except, perhaps, &#8220;For Better or Worse.&#8221;  But then I don&#8217;t think the writer expects us to find them funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32299</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32299</guid>
		<description>Eh, I think Boondocks is at least sometimes funny, even when I disagree with it.  Day by Day has never provoked so much as a grin; it's a dumb harangue with drawings.  If you want funny cartoons from the right, there's no beating John Bergstrom's "Attack Cartoons":
&lt;a href="http://attackcartoons.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://attackcartoons.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, I think Boondocks is at least sometimes funny, even when I disagree with it.  Day by Day has never provoked so much as a grin; it&#8217;s a dumb harangue with drawings.  If you want funny cartoons from the right, there&#8217;s no beating John Bergstrom&#8217;s &#8220;Attack Cartoons&#8221;:<br />
<a href="http://attackcartoons.com/" rel="nofollow">http://attackcartoons.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32298</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32298</guid>
		<description>OK, that one's funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, that one&#8217;s funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digamma</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32297</link>
		<dc:creator>digamma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32297</guid>
		<description>I think Boondocks is funny.  Here's &lt;a href="http://digamma.net/~mt/images/bo031003.gif" rel="nofollow"&gt;one of my favorites&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Boondocks is funny.  Here&#8217;s <a href="http://digamma.net/~mt/images/bo031003.gif" rel="nofollow">one of my favorites</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John T. Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32296</link>
		<dc:creator>John T. Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32296</guid>
		<description>You right it isn't funny, but then neither is Bloom County.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You right it isn&#8217;t funny, but then neither is Bloom County.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32295</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32295</guid>
		<description>I read an interview with (I'm pretty sure it was) Norm MacDonald and he was talking about when he anchored Weekend Update on Saturday Night Live.  He talked about how he loved getting laughs from the audience, but he absolutely hated getting applause.

Applause means you've said something that the audience approves of.  Laughter means you've actually said something funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an interview with (I&#8217;m pretty sure it was) Norm MacDonald and he was talking about when he anchored Weekend Update on Saturday Night Live.  He talked about how he loved getting laughs from the audience, but he absolutely hated getting applause.</p>
<p>Applause means you&#8217;ve said something that the audience approves of.  Laughter means you&#8217;ve actually said something funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete L</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32294</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32294</guid>
		<description>Have to agree.  Reviewed a few of these strips, and it just isn't funny.  At least the liberal leaning strips tend to be funny (sometimes unintentionally, of course).

Oh, and Non Sequitur . . . "Obvious Man" kills me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree.  Reviewed a few of these strips, and it just isn&#8217;t funny.  At least the liberal leaning strips tend to be funny (sometimes unintentionally, of course).</p>
<p>Oh, and Non Sequitur . . . &#8220;Obvious Man&#8221; kills me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragoon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32293</link>
		<dc:creator>dragoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32293</guid>
		<description>Damn, I was hoping to say "At least it isn't Mallard Fillmore", but today's comic is about as bad. "MoveOn.org thinks Bush is a nazi!" Really cutting edge social commentary there. Echo chamber all the way. The only funny conservative cartoonist I've ever read is John Bergstrom's &lt;a href="http://www.attackcartoons.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Attack Cartoons&lt;/a&gt;. His mocking Libertarian Man series is definitely worth reading.&lt;p&gt;
But this Day to Day strip reminds me of the rancid comic User Friendly and its pandering to the Slashdot bunch. Pander to a large enough group's prejudices and sit back and bask in the accolades. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I was hoping to say &#8220;At least it isn&#8217;t Mallard Fillmore&#8221;, but today&#8217;s comic is about as bad. &#8220;MoveOn.org thinks Bush is a nazi!&#8221; Really cutting edge social commentary there. Echo chamber all the way. The only funny conservative cartoonist I&#8217;ve ever read is John Bergstrom&#8217;s <a href="http://www.attackcartoons.com/" rel="nofollow">Attack Cartoons</a>. His mocking Libertarian Man series is definitely worth reading.
<p>
But this Day to Day strip reminds me of the rancid comic User Friendly and its pandering to the Slashdot bunch. Pander to a large enough group&#8217;s prejudices and sit back and bask in the accolades. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don W.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32292</link>
		<dc:creator>Don W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32292</guid>
		<description>I'll stick with Non Sequitur...not overtly political (usually), but subtly libertarian, and always funny.  

My favorite: "The beginning of government."  A man sets up a table.  Posts a sign.  Sits down and waits.  

The sign reads: "Pay half your money.  Expect Nothing.  Get what you expect."  

Also I like Pearls Before Swine...that little pig is cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll stick with Non Sequitur&#8230;not overtly political (usually), but subtly libertarian, and always funny.  </p>
<p>My favorite: &#8220;The beginning of government.&#8221;  A man sets up a table.  Posts a sign.  Sits down and waits.  </p>
<p>The sign reads: &#8220;Pay half your money.  Expect Nothing.  Get what you expect.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Also I like Pearls Before Swine&#8230;that little pig is cute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougB</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32291</link>
		<dc:creator>DougB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32291</guid>
		<description>The one I read was pretty funny. It was ironic and satiric. I'll have to look at it more long term, but first impression is: funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one I read was pretty funny. It was ironic and satiric. I&#8217;ll have to look at it more long term, but first impression is: funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/30/droll-by-droll/#comment-32290</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3324#comment-32290</guid>
		<description>This sentence pretty much explains its popularity: "Day by Day just restates the things its fans were already thinking."

That's ok, but does not comedy make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sentence pretty much explains its popularity: &#8220;Day by Day just restates the things its fans were already thinking.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s ok, but does not comedy make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
