<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Thoughts on Rush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Trommetter Times</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30796</link>
		<dc:creator>The Trommetter Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 18:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30796</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;McNabb Is Over-Rated&lt;/strong&gt;

McNabb, Eagles find lost rhythm &quot;McNabb&#039;s quarterback rating of 41.4 was the lowest in the NFL. His self-esteem was even...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>McNabb Is Over-Rated</strong></p>
<p>McNabb, Eagles find lost rhythm &#8220;McNabb&#8217;s quarterback rating of 41.4 was the lowest in the NFL. His self-esteem was even&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30794</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 17:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30794</guid>
		<description>Radley, great point on mention Warren Moon.  On top of being a great QB for the NFL, it wasn&#039;t till about 3yrs before his retierment that a new rookie in the CFL broke some of his records.  Moon still has plenty.  

And props to all those that mentioned how under-rated McMair is.  He is never mentioned in the sports community though out of the last four years he&#039;s taken his team to 1 Super Bowl, 2 AFC Championship games, and 1 playoff year.  If that&#039;s not consistant, I don&#039;t know what is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley, great point on mention Warren Moon.  On top of being a great QB for the NFL, it wasn&#8217;t till about 3yrs before his retierment that a new rookie in the CFL broke some of his records.  Moon still has plenty.  </p>
<p>And props to all those that mentioned how under-rated McMair is.  He is never mentioned in the sports community though out of the last four years he&#8217;s taken his team to 1 Super Bowl, 2 AFC Championship games, and 1 playoff year.  If that&#8217;s not consistant, I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30793</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30793</guid>
		<description>I remember Vick&#039;s pass against the Dolphin&#039;s in his rookie year. He almost brought them back to win with his exciting runs and incredible throws. Of course I think he threw four interceptions that day, overshadowing his great plays. He was just a rookie though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember Vick&#8217;s pass against the Dolphin&#8217;s in his rookie year. He almost brought them back to win with his exciting runs and incredible throws. Of course I think he threw four interceptions that day, overshadowing his great plays. He was just a rookie though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30792</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 14:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30792</guid>
		<description>Boswell in the Post:
&quot;The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well?  You mean, like Warren Moon, who starred for 16 years and retired long ago? Or one who wins the Super Bowl as Doug Williams did in 1988? Earth to Rush, hire a clipping service. African American quarterbacks now come and go, succeed or fail, and nobody notices. It&#039;s called progress. Two years ago, Tony Banks was the Redskins&#039; starting quarerback. Did Redskin fans discuss or care that he was an African American? Did it seem that &quot;the media&quot; was invested in his success or failure, based on his race?&#039;

Bryan Cox is a bigger idiot than Rush who has even less business being there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boswell in the Post:<br />
&#8220;The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well?  You mean, like Warren Moon, who starred for 16 years and retired long ago? Or one who wins the Super Bowl as Doug Williams did in 1988? Earth to Rush, hire a clipping service. African American quarterbacks now come and go, succeed or fail, and nobody notices. It&#8217;s called progress. Two years ago, Tony Banks was the Redskins&#8217; starting quarerback. Did Redskin fans discuss or care that he was an African American? Did it seem that &#8220;the media&#8221; was invested in his success or failure, based on his race?&#8217;</p>
<p>Bryan Cox is a bigger idiot than Rush who has even less business being there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkey Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30791</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkey Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 14:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30791</guid>
		<description>Check out Allen Barra&#039;s point of view. He is well respected, and supports Rush&#039;s oppinion. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2089193/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://slate.msn.com/id/2089193/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Allen Barra&#8217;s point of view. He is well respected, and supports Rush&#8217;s oppinion.<br />
<a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2089193/" rel="nofollow">http://slate.msn.com/id/2089193/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Wilde</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30790</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Wilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 14:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30790</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Michael Vick is certainly exciting to watch. But there&#039;s no possible way he can live up to the hype that&#039;s been built for him. He&#039;s a running back with a strong, but wildly inaccurate arm. He completed 177 passes in his entire college career -- about the number a good quarterback heading up a pass-oriented offense completes in half a season. My prediction? Unless he improves his accuracy, he&#039;ll make a Pro Bowl or two, then he&#039;ll flame out in five years. Meanwhile, I&#039;ll predict that Michael Bishop -- a smart, drop-back passer with great field vision -- will soon be a superstar. And yes, he&#039;s black.&lt;/i&gt;

I must humbly disagree with the agitator.  Vick is one of the most accurate long passers in the game.  Remember the pass he made moving to his left 50 yards downfield on a rope hitting the receiver in the numbers against the dolphins in his rookie year?  Or the pass he made to Andre Davis that went 65 yards in the air off his back foot that hit davis in stride against BC in 1999?  Granted these are just anecdotes, but they are representative of his accuracy.  He is one of the most accurate passers in the league right now.

The fact that he threw few passes in college says nothing about accuracy; you did not site a completion percentage.  It says more about the system he was in.

Simply put, Michael Vick is Jordan with a helmet.  Michael Bishop couldn&#039;t hold Vick&#039;s jockstrap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Michael Vick is certainly exciting to watch. But there&#8217;s no possible way he can live up to the hype that&#8217;s been built for him. He&#8217;s a running back with a strong, but wildly inaccurate arm. He completed 177 passes in his entire college career &#8212; about the number a good quarterback heading up a pass-oriented offense completes in half a season. My prediction? Unless he improves his accuracy, he&#8217;ll make a Pro Bowl or two, then he&#8217;ll flame out in five years. Meanwhile, I&#8217;ll predict that Michael Bishop &#8212; a smart, drop-back passer with great field vision &#8212; will soon be a superstar. And yes, he&#8217;s black.</i></p>
<p>I must humbly disagree with the agitator.  Vick is one of the most accurate long passers in the game.  Remember the pass he made moving to his left 50 yards downfield on a rope hitting the receiver in the numbers against the dolphins in his rookie year?  Or the pass he made to Andre Davis that went 65 yards in the air off his back foot that hit davis in stride against BC in 1999?  Granted these are just anecdotes, but they are representative of his accuracy.  He is one of the most accurate passers in the league right now.</p>
<p>The fact that he threw few passes in college says nothing about accuracy; you did not site a completion percentage.  It says more about the system he was in.</p>
<p>Simply put, Michael Vick is Jordan with a helmet.  Michael Bishop couldn&#8217;t hold Vick&#8217;s jockstrap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkey Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30789</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkey Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30789</guid>
		<description>Wallster, 

They may not hire inferior QB&#039;s to fill some PC motives, 

but, they may have to hire inferior coaches because the NAACP says so, and may face fines if they dont at least interview. Case : The Detroit Lions, Millen tried to meet the NAACP&#039;s requirements, but no black coaches would be interviewd because they Knew the lions wanted the Mooch. Thus, the Lions, and Matt Millen were fined 200k.

How long before Hiring QB&#039;s to fill a quota becomes the norm? 

How come nobody is complaining about the lack of black punters? 

The point is that as a team owner, you should hire, and are expected to hire the BEST tallent regardless of race. It may not have been true 20 years ago, but it is true today. We have progressed, we have moved on. 

But what is stopping the NAACP from complaining about the disproportionate amount of black team owners? 

Oh, and when can we start complaining about the disproportionate amount white basketball players? 

And while we are at it, When will the NAACP start complaining about how Hockey is nothing but a good ole boy network only fit for White players. 

When will MLK finally get his Freeking way? When jessey and al and louis check out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallster, </p>
<p>They may not hire inferior QB&#8217;s to fill some PC motives, </p>
<p>but, they may have to hire inferior coaches because the NAACP says so, and may face fines if they dont at least interview. Case : The Detroit Lions, Millen tried to meet the NAACP&#8217;s requirements, but no black coaches would be interviewd because they Knew the lions wanted the Mooch. Thus, the Lions, and Matt Millen were fined 200k.</p>
<p>How long before Hiring QB&#8217;s to fill a quota becomes the norm? </p>
<p>How come nobody is complaining about the lack of black punters? </p>
<p>The point is that as a team owner, you should hire, and are expected to hire the BEST tallent regardless of race. It may not have been true 20 years ago, but it is true today. We have progressed, we have moved on. </p>
<p>But what is stopping the NAACP from complaining about the disproportionate amount of black team owners? </p>
<p>Oh, and when can we start complaining about the disproportionate amount white basketball players? </p>
<p>And while we are at it, When will the NAACP start complaining about how Hockey is nothing but a good ole boy network only fit for White players. </p>
<p>When will MLK finally get his Freeking way? When jessey and al and louis check out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30788</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 10:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30788</guid>
		<description>Allen Barra makes many of the points expressed here, including my defense of Brad Johnson, over at Slate:

slate.msn.com/id/2089193/

He goes as far as to agree with Rush that McNabb is overrated, which I am not willing to do. He does make a pretty compelling argument using Eagles offensive statistics vs. defensive statistics over the last three years to prove the case that the &quot;defense carried this team&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen Barra makes many of the points expressed here, including my defense of Brad Johnson, over at Slate:</p>
<p>slate.msn.com/id/2089193/</p>
<p>He goes as far as to agree with Rush that McNabb is overrated, which I am not willing to do. He does make a pretty compelling argument using Eagles offensive statistics vs. defensive statistics over the last three years to prove the case that the &#8220;defense carried this team&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30787</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 04:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30787</guid>
		<description>Scared stiff--Brian Cox said at the beginning of the season that Peyton Manning was the &quot;poster boy&quot; of the year because that&#039;s what WHITE america wants.  No racism there of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scared stiff&#8211;Brian Cox said at the beginning of the season that Peyton Manning was the &#8220;poster boy&#8221; of the year because that&#8217;s what WHITE america wants.  No racism there of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30786</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 02:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30786</guid>
		<description>McNabb is an awesome quarterback there&#039;s no doubt about that. I have heard very few people that agree with what Rush said. I have, however, heard alot of people defend his right to say it. Besides McNabb is a big boy and he has to take the good with the bad. The criticism will stop once he turns it around and I truly believe that he will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McNabb is an awesome quarterback there&#8217;s no doubt about that. I have heard very few people that agree with what Rush said. I have, however, heard alot of people defend his right to say it. Besides McNabb is a big boy and he has to take the good with the bad. The criticism will stop once he turns it around and I truly believe that he will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John T. Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30785</link>
		<dc:creator>John T. Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 01:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30785</guid>
		<description>&quot;McNabb had two great seasons, and one so-far regrettable one. You&#039;re free to quarrel with Rush about the individual merits of McNabb. We&#039;ll see.&quot;

This was a terrible thing to drop on McNabb. How exactly is he supposed to argue the case that his performace hasn&#039;t been inflated by a condescending media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McNabb had two great seasons, and one so-far regrettable one. You&#8217;re free to quarrel with Rush about the individual merits of McNabb. We&#8217;ll see.&#8221;</p>
<p>This was a terrible thing to drop on McNabb. How exactly is he supposed to argue the case that his performace hasn&#8217;t been inflated by a condescending media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30784</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 00:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30784</guid>
		<description>Culpepper- 66.7 career passer rating

McNabb- 79.3 career passer rating

Vick- 86 passer rating last year in 
      first full year

McNair- 81.7 career passer rating

Johnson- 84.6 career passer rating     
         11th highest of all time
 
         92.9 last year to lead NFC

         63% completion percentage 2002
         
         2nd to Brett Favre in 
         winning percentage for 
         active QB&#039;s   

Granted all of the other guys could outrun Johnson on their knees but I think Brad Johnson has proven to be a winner throughout his career. He&#039;s not flashy but he&#039;s consistent and he wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Culpepper- 66.7 career passer rating</p>
<p>McNabb- 79.3 career passer rating</p>
<p>Vick- 86 passer rating last year in<br />
      first full year</p>
<p>McNair- 81.7 career passer rating</p>
<p>Johnson- 84.6 career passer rating<br />
         11th highest of all time</p>
<p>         92.9 last year to lead NFC</p>
<p>         63% completion percentage 2002</p>
<p>         2nd to Brett Favre in<br />
         winning percentage for<br />
         active QB&#8217;s   </p>
<p>Granted all of the other guys could outrun Johnson on their knees but I think Brad Johnson has proven to be a winner throughout his career. He&#8217;s not flashy but he&#8217;s consistent and he wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30783</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 00:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30783</guid>
		<description>Brad Johnson&#039;s role on the Bucs is far greater than just not making mistakes. I will guarantee you that his career QB rating is better than that of Vick, McNabb, or Culpepper. He has excelled everywhere he has played and has one of the highest completion percentages of any quarterback in history. I will get back with you on the numbers, but while Johnson is not as flashy as many other quarterbacks he is among the finest in the game. I also believe he is the only one among the names mentioned to have a 4000 yard season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad Johnson&#8217;s role on the Bucs is far greater than just not making mistakes. I will guarantee you that his career QB rating is better than that of Vick, McNabb, or Culpepper. He has excelled everywhere he has played and has one of the highest completion percentages of any quarterback in history. I will get back with you on the numbers, but while Johnson is not as flashy as many other quarterbacks he is among the finest in the game. I also believe he is the only one among the names mentioned to have a 4000 yard season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc w.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30782</link>
		<dc:creator>marc w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 23:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30782</guid>
		<description>Mark from NY,

I&#039;m glad you&#039;re not suggesting that white players (or Gannon and Warner in particular) are given a pass when they play poorly.  Gannon especially seems not to have recovered from the savaging he got in the super bowl and the media.  And someone on ESPN stated flat out that the Rams could only make the playoffs with Bulger at QB - and this before the year began.  
Still, let&#039;s just agree that other factors beyond race hatred and pure, unadulturated malice went into the decision to give Warner the MVP in 2001 over McNabb.  
The race issue was a red herring from the beginning.  Forget McNabb - personally, I think he&#039;s a bit overrated myself - think about Steve McNair.  There&#039;s a guy with zero help who&#039;s gotten his bunch of old, slow and generally untalented teammates to the playoffs time and again.  They haven&#039;t even had a particularly dominant defense save in 1999 (which was luck).  If there really was a vast conspiracy to shove black QB success down the throat of the football watching public, Steve McNair&#039;s face would be ubiquitous.  He&#039;d be in BASEBALL ads.  

Shane,
sorry to be picky, but the white winner of the slam dunk contest was Brent Barry.  Jon Barry&#039;s his 3 point shooting brother who&#039;s probably never dunked outside of a playstation game.  And sorry, but Brad Johnson doesn&#039;t deserve the press that Culpepper or Vick get.  Those guys change the entire tenor of a game.  Brad Johnson&#039;s success is based on not making mistakes.  It&#039;s totally different.  Unless you&#039;re arguing that winning a super bowl is the sole criteria upon which QBs should be judged, in which case you&#039;d have to say that Trent Dilfer is better than Michael Vick, Daunte Culpepper, Rich Gannon and Dan Marino.  I&#039;m about the biggest Seahawks fan you&#039;re likely to find, but I&#039;m unwilling to make that claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark from NY,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re not suggesting that white players (or Gannon and Warner in particular) are given a pass when they play poorly.  Gannon especially seems not to have recovered from the savaging he got in the super bowl and the media.  And someone on ESPN stated flat out that the Rams could only make the playoffs with Bulger at QB &#8211; and this before the year began.<br />
Still, let&#8217;s just agree that other factors beyond race hatred and pure, unadulturated malice went into the decision to give Warner the MVP in 2001 over McNabb.<br />
The race issue was a red herring from the beginning.  Forget McNabb &#8211; personally, I think he&#8217;s a bit overrated myself &#8211; think about Steve McNair.  There&#8217;s a guy with zero help who&#8217;s gotten his bunch of old, slow and generally untalented teammates to the playoffs time and again.  They haven&#8217;t even had a particularly dominant defense save in 1999 (which was luck).  If there really was a vast conspiracy to shove black QB success down the throat of the football watching public, Steve McNair&#8217;s face would be ubiquitous.  He&#8217;d be in BASEBALL ads.  </p>
<p>Shane,<br />
sorry to be picky, but the white winner of the slam dunk contest was Brent Barry.  Jon Barry&#8217;s his 3 point shooting brother who&#8217;s probably never dunked outside of a playstation game.  And sorry, but Brad Johnson doesn&#8217;t deserve the press that Culpepper or Vick get.  Those guys change the entire tenor of a game.  Brad Johnson&#8217;s success is based on not making mistakes.  It&#8217;s totally different.  Unless you&#8217;re arguing that winning a super bowl is the sole criteria upon which QBs should be judged, in which case you&#8217;d have to say that Trent Dilfer is better than Michael Vick, Daunte Culpepper, Rich Gannon and Dan Marino.  I&#8217;m about the biggest Seahawks fan you&#8217;re likely to find, but I&#8217;m unwilling to make that claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallster</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30781</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 23:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30781</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine how anybody could not see the racism in Limbaugh&#039;s comments.  He seeks to discount an athlete&#039;s abilities based on his race!  There are something like 9 black QB&#039;s in the league now.  Doug Williams said it best in one of the morning TV shows, something like &quot;the owners invest millions of dollars in these teams, they&#039;r not going to hire an inferior quarterback just to make a political statement.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine how anybody could not see the racism in Limbaugh&#8217;s comments.  He seeks to discount an athlete&#8217;s abilities based on his race!  There are something like 9 black QB&#8217;s in the league now.  Doug Williams said it best in one of the morning TV shows, something like &#8220;the owners invest millions of dollars in these teams, they&#8217;r not going to hire an inferior quarterback just to make a political statement.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scared Stiff</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30780</link>
		<dc:creator>Scared Stiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 23:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30780</guid>
		<description>Peyton Manning also gets tons of unwarrented press because he&#039;s black too, I suppose.

Any statement that focuses on race is racial in nature.  Seems pretty clear to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peyton Manning also gets tons of unwarrented press because he&#8217;s black too, I suppose.</p>
<p>Any statement that focuses on race is racial in nature.  Seems pretty clear to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John T. Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30779</link>
		<dc:creator>John T. Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 23:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30779</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see cowardice Radley, Rush has his own soapbox which I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll defend. There is no free speech issue at ESPN, he was there to serve them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see cowardice Radley, Rush has his own soapbox which I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;ll defend. There is no free speech issue at ESPN, he was there to serve them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30778</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30778</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t for the life of me see how anybody could say Rush&#039;s comments were racial. He said the media is &quot;looking&quot; for a black QB to praise. It&#039;s true. They sell more merchandise! Anybody remember John Barry, the white guy who won the NBA slam dunk contest? Did HE get shoe contract? Deny it if you want, but they guy was right. Mcknabb is overrated, and so it Vick. They&#039;ve done a LOT less than Brad Johnson. Still who gets all the publicity? Guys like McKnabb, Culpepper and Vick. Anybody who can&#039;t see THAT is blind. 

Beyond that, anything that mentions race is so frightening in this country. I&#039;m surprised Al Sharpton isn&#039;t on the news right now screaming racism. Or is he? I doubt he&#039;d miss an opportunity. The mere mention of race gets twisted and turns into hatred by those with.... what exactly? Nothing better to do? I mean, really, it&#039;s somewhat insulting that you can&#039;t say anything about race without being attacked. At what point are we no longer protecting minorities but instead, patronizing them to death?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t for the life of me see how anybody could say Rush&#8217;s comments were racial. He said the media is &#8220;looking&#8221; for a black QB to praise. It&#8217;s true. They sell more merchandise! Anybody remember John Barry, the white guy who won the NBA slam dunk contest? Did HE get shoe contract? Deny it if you want, but they guy was right. Mcknabb is overrated, and so it Vick. They&#8217;ve done a LOT less than Brad Johnson. Still who gets all the publicity? Guys like McKnabb, Culpepper and Vick. Anybody who can&#8217;t see THAT is blind. </p>
<p>Beyond that, anything that mentions race is so frightening in this country. I&#8217;m surprised Al Sharpton isn&#8217;t on the news right now screaming racism. Or is he? I doubt he&#8217;d miss an opportunity. The mere mention of race gets twisted and turns into hatred by those with&#8230;. what exactly? Nothing better to do? I mean, really, it&#8217;s somewhat insulting that you can&#8217;t say anything about race without being attacked. At what point are we no longer protecting minorities but instead, patronizing them to death?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark from New York</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30777</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark from New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30777</guid>
		<description>Marc W.

I hope you didn&#039;t infer that I felt there was a conspiracy to shield whites from criticism, because I have absolutely no reason to believe that, nor could I cite one iota of evidence to support it. (Being a New Yorker, I assure you that there are no sensitivities whatsoever to the cruel condemnation players suffer at the hands of the local media and fans. There is also no bias whatsoever in praising them. Fans, coaches and sportswriters all love great players, great teams, great seasons, etc.)

It never crossed my mind -- nor do I recall any sportswriter or friend or enemy of mine mentioning that McNabb was robbed of the 2001 MVP because he was black. I think Warner got the MVP for the very reason you suggested: he had godlike (oops!) stats. McNabb was my choice for MVP in 2001 because I felt he was indeed MOST VALUABLE. He did more with less than Warner, even though Warner&#039;s stats were better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc W.</p>
<p>I hope you didn&#8217;t infer that I felt there was a conspiracy to shield whites from criticism, because I have absolutely no reason to believe that, nor could I cite one iota of evidence to support it. (Being a New Yorker, I assure you that there are no sensitivities whatsoever to the cruel condemnation players suffer at the hands of the local media and fans. There is also no bias whatsoever in praising them. Fans, coaches and sportswriters all love great players, great teams, great seasons, etc.)</p>
<p>It never crossed my mind &#8212; nor do I recall any sportswriter or friend or enemy of mine mentioning that McNabb was robbed of the 2001 MVP because he was black. I think Warner got the MVP for the very reason you suggested: he had godlike (oops!) stats. McNabb was my choice for MVP in 2001 because I felt he was indeed MOST VALUABLE. He did more with less than Warner, even though Warner&#8217;s stats were better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc w.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/10/02/a-few-thoughts-on-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-30776</link>
		<dc:creator>marc w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3201#comment-30776</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you can&#039;t see the racism in that, you&#039;re blind.&quot; 
Mark, 
Take a deep breath.  While I agree that Rush&#039;s comments were pretty dumb, and that sportwriters will hype anyone who shows flashes of talent (Scott Mitchell, Steve Bono, Majkowski) regardless of race, you&#039;re way off in suggesting that the NFL is somehow terrified of letting a black QB win MVP.  

While Kurt Warner is indeed a white christian (hey! why&#039;d you bring religion into this?  Are you god-baiting or something?), his 2001 season was, statistically speaking, one of the best ever.  He took his team to the super bowl.  He threw for almost 5,000 yards.  You want to say that the talent surrounding him was better, or that the system they ran was conducive to passing yards, fine, but since when have those things counted against a guy in the MVP voting?  You can make a case for McNabb that year, though I&#039;d still say it&#039;s a tough one.  His QB rating was around 15 points lower.  Let&#039;s just say it&#039;s far from settled that McNabb was robbed.  
Same with Gannon last year - he clearly had a great season and probably deserved the award.  
More importantly Gannon and especially Warner haven&#039;t been immune from criticism.  Warner was savaged by ESPN before the year and esp. after the first game.   There is no conspiracy to shield whites from criticism, okay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you can&#8217;t see the racism in that, you&#8217;re blind.&#8221;<br />
Mark,<br />
Take a deep breath.  While I agree that Rush&#8217;s comments were pretty dumb, and that sportwriters will hype anyone who shows flashes of talent (Scott Mitchell, Steve Bono, Majkowski) regardless of race, you&#8217;re way off in suggesting that the NFL is somehow terrified of letting a black QB win MVP.  </p>
<p>While Kurt Warner is indeed a white christian (hey! why&#8217;d you bring religion into this?  Are you god-baiting or something?), his 2001 season was, statistically speaking, one of the best ever.  He took his team to the super bowl.  He threw for almost 5,000 yards.  You want to say that the talent surrounding him was better, or that the system they ran was conducive to passing yards, fine, but since when have those things counted against a guy in the MVP voting?  You can make a case for McNabb that year, though I&#8217;d still say it&#8217;s a tough one.  His QB rating was around 15 points lower.  Let&#8217;s just say it&#8217;s far from settled that McNabb was robbed.<br />
Same with Gannon last year &#8211; he clearly had a great season and probably deserved the award.<br />
More importantly Gannon and especially Warner haven&#8217;t been immune from criticism.  Warner was savaged by ESPN before the year and esp. after the first game.   There is no conspiracy to shield whites from criticism, okay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

