Comments on: Mel and Little Mel http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/ It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:30:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: visit http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28906 visit Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:13:33 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28906 Please take a look at some information on<a href="http://www.yourpsychic.net/pacific-poker.html" rel="nofollow"> betting </a> . Please take a look at some information on betting .

]]> By: viagra http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28904 viagra Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:02:35 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28904 lovely site! Keep up the good work! lovely site! Keep up the good work!

]]> By: A Friend http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28903 A Friend Tue, 25 May 2004 02:58:51 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28903 RAMON BRADBURRY, RICH, Ray, Richard, WHATEVER name he is hiding behind. (Ray Bradbury) Does everyone know that this great guy has been arrested for rape? Child molestor??? Back in 97,98,99.. So a little research folks.. It's all there. HCSO ONLINE only goes back 5 years, so please.. do a little research, make a call or two.. Intresting info on such a great, great guy. You should be in jail / shot for all your crimes. He should not even be around KIDS. his site is www.pumpgate.com I've informed all the news sites that have reported on him, they will be pulling his posts down. RAMON BRADBURRY, RICH, Ray, Richard, WHATEVER name he is hiding behind. (Ray Bradbury) Does everyone know that this great guy has been arrested for rape? Child molestor??? Back in 97,98,99.. So a little research folks.. It’s all there.

HCSO ONLINE only goes back 5 years, so please.. do a little research, make a call or two.. Intresting info on such a great, great guy. You should be in jail / shot for all your crimes.

He should not even be around KIDS.

his site is http://www.pumpgate.com
I’ve informed all the news sites that have reported on him, they will be pulling his posts down.

]]> By: rg http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28901 rg Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:28:12 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28901 I was in straight in 81 and have never really looked back but that place was pure shit. I think all the principals should be prosecuted criminally and sued civilly. Has anyone thought of a class action suit? I was in straight in 81 and have never really looked back but that place was pure shit. I think all the principals should be prosecuted criminally and sued civilly. Has anyone thought of a class action suit?

]]> By: Jason http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28900 Jason Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:08:08 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28900 "Last week, Mel and Betty Sembler's attorney, Leonard S. Englander, persuaded a judge to issue a temporary injunction. It orders the man to stay away from the Semblers and to return their property." I remember reading about a Supreme Court case under the Reagan Administration (I can't remember the particulars here; any legal scholars in the house?) in which the court ruled that, because a California man had thrown out his drug paraphernalia with the rest of his garbage, he had no protection against it being seized as evidence against him. Basically, the court said that once you toss it out it isn't your property anymore. Seems to me that Bradbury doesn't have any property belonging to the Semblers, and thus can't return anything belonging to them. Has this been since overturned? I'm guessing not, because it's affiliated with the Drug War, a sancrosanct government intrusion scheme if ever there was one. “Last week, Mel and Betty Sembler’s attorney, Leonard S. Englander, persuaded a judge to issue a temporary injunction. It orders the man to stay away from the Semblers and to return their property.”

I remember reading about a Supreme Court case under the Reagan Administration (I can’t remember the particulars here; any legal scholars in the house?) in which the court ruled that, because a California man had thrown out his drug paraphernalia with the rest of his garbage, he had no protection against it being seized as evidence against him. Basically, the court said that once you toss it out it isn’t your property anymore. Seems to me that Bradbury doesn’t have any property belonging to the Semblers, and thus can’t return anything belonging to them.

Has this been since overturned? I’m guessing not, because it’s affiliated with the Drug War, a sancrosanct government intrusion scheme if ever there was one.

]]> By: Leigh Bright http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28899 Leigh Bright Tue, 09 Sep 2003 14:19:44 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28899 Thank you for carrying these stories about Straight/Sembler/et. al. Radley! We appreciate the support. Thank you for carrying these stories about Straight/Sembler/et. al. Radley! We appreciate the support.

]]> By: Jon H http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28898 Jon H Tue, 09 Sep 2003 04:41:17 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28898 Oh, well, I guess I'm wrong about the kind of pump involved. You wouldn't find a discarded implant in the household trash. This sounds more like the kind of penis pump featured in Austin Powers. Oh, well, I guess I’m wrong about the kind of pump involved.

You wouldn’t find a discarded implant in the household trash.

This sounds more like the kind of penis pump featured in Austin Powers.

]]> By: Joe Sims http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28897 Joe Sims Tue, 09 Sep 2003 04:31:30 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28897 It was, after all, in the trash. Something that potentially embarrassing might have been disposed of in a more discreet manner than putting it in with the coffee grounds and throwing it on the curb. I gotta side with Bradbury. BTW, when I saw the word 'agitator' in the headline, I thought to myself, "Omigod, Radley's gone off the deep end with his Sembler vendetta!" Now THAT'S brand consciousness!! It was, after all, in the trash. Something that potentially embarrassing might have been disposed of in a more discreet manner than putting it in with the coffee grounds and throwing it on the curb.

I gotta side with Bradbury.

BTW, when I saw the word ‘agitator’ in the headline, I thought to myself, “Omigod, Radley’s gone off the deep end with his Sembler vendetta!” Now THAT’S brand consciousness!!

]]> By: Antigen http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28896 Antigen Tue, 09 Sep 2003 04:27:53 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28896 I didn't know that. In fact, Melvin's making a big deal out of Richard having spread this personal information all over the world. But I never knew about the cancer before Englander told us all. I really though someone had given a penis enlarger to him as a joke and he'd thrown it out. I'm not sure how many people even believed that it was Melvin's pump before he affirmed ownership with this lawsuit. So I don't believe that the lawsuit is really about an invasion of privacy or emotional duress. I think it's a way to slapp Richard into silence. Just look at some of the verbage going back and forth in the papers. Richard talks about well known child abuse and documentable ties to Mel Sembler while Sembler throws around ad hominem attacks and then whines about his tender feelings. Read this and tell me if his former clients might have a claim regarding his and Betty's continual public bragging about what they've done to us. <a href="http://thestraights.com/editorials/tash_vietnam.htm" rel="nofollow">http://thestraights.com/editorials/tash_vietnam.htm</a> I didn’t know that. In fact, Melvin’s making a big deal out of Richard having spread this personal information all over the world. But I never knew about the cancer before Englander told us all. I really though someone had given a penis enlarger to him as a joke and he’d thrown it out. I’m not sure how many people even believed that it was Melvin’s pump before he affirmed ownership with this lawsuit.

So I don’t believe that the lawsuit is really about an invasion of privacy or emotional duress. I think it’s a way to slapp Richard into silence. Just look at some of the verbage going back and forth in the papers. Richard talks about well known child abuse and documentable ties to Mel Sembler while Sembler throws around ad hominem attacks and then whines about his tender feelings.

Read this and tell me if his former clients might have a claim regarding his and Betty’s continual public bragging about what they’ve done to us.

http://thestraights.com/editorials/tash_vietnam.htm

]]> By: Jon H http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28895 Jon H Tue, 09 Sep 2003 01:59:12 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28895 A 'penis pump' in this context is something you might think of as "Air Johnson". It's for people who can't get a stiffy; they have an inflatable bladder implanted in the weenie. The pump part goes in the scrotum, I think. A ‘penis pump’ in this context is something you might think of as “Air Johnson”.

It’s for people who can’t get a stiffy; they have an inflatable bladder implanted in the weenie. The pump part goes in the scrotum, I think.

]]> By: Antigen http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28894 Antigen Tue, 09 Sep 2003 01:58:53 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28894 Thank you, Radley, for bringing this up. Here are some letters to the SpiT eidtor. I don't know if any have been published or if they will be. <a href="http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=2918&forum=7&16" rel="nofollow">http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=2918&forum=7&16</a> Thank you, Radley, for bringing this up. Here are some letters to the SpiT eidtor. I don’t know if any have been published or if they will be.

http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=2918&forum=7&16

]]> By: shane http://www.theagitator.com/2003/09/08/mel-and-little-mel/comment-page-1/#comment-28893 shane Tue, 09 Sep 2003 01:10:15 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=3053#comment-28893 I couldn't agree more, Radley. Shane I couldn’t agree more, Radley.

Shane

]]>