<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes Virginia, There Really Is a Anti-Telemarketer Market!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: order valium</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27747</link>
		<dc:creator>order valium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27747</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://epharma.pbwiki.com/valium&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;order valium&lt;/a&gt; ViaValT8898111-01-01-22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://epharma.pbwiki.com/valium" rel="nofollow">order valium</a> ViaValT8898111-01-01-22</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xenical online</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27746</link>
		<dc:creator>xenical online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27746</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogcity.com/wass/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;xenical online&lt;/a&gt; Xen-770009122-345566</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.blogcity.com/wass/" rel="nofollow">xenical online</a> Xen-770009122-345566</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27744</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27744</guid>
		<description>Concerning the &#039;Do Not Call&#039; List and blocking all unwanted calls, we are posting the latest information about our new release, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://privacycall.com/pages/caller-id-screener-intro.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Privacy Call ID Screener&lt;/a&gt;.  We consider it to be the ultimate solution for ending &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; annoying and unwanted calls to your home or business.&lt;b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TECHNOLOGY TRIUMPHS OVER FTCâ??S â??DO NOT CALLâ? LIST
New Caller ID Screener Allows Only &#039;Invited&#039; Callers to Ring - Free of Fees&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Telemarketing companies and exempted groups may have found loopholes in the new National &quot;Do Not Call&quot; List, but telecom automation groundbreaker Bill Sasso of      Digitone Communications thwarts them again with his latest invention, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://privacycall.com/pages/id-screener-3.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Privacy Call ID Screener&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A small, tabletop device designed for customers who subscribe to Caller ID, the Privacy Call ID Screener allows only &#039;Invited&#039; callers to ring their phone. All other callers are handled as the consumer chooses. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although the device is customizable, its use is simple. Callers on the consumer&#039;s &#039;Invited&#039; list ring through without interference, while anonymous or unfamiliar callers are asked to identify themselves or leave a message, without ringing the phone. Callers on the consumer&#039;s &#039;Excluded&#039; list cannot ring the phone or leave a message, including cell phone, out-of-state, and international callers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;We call it &#039;Caller ID with attitude!&#039;,&quot; says Sasso. &quot;Now consumers can choose who can ring their phone, and when, without the limits and extra monthly charges from your telephone service provider. Using the unit&#039;s Caller ID screen, it only takes a push of a button to add callers to your &#039;Included&#039; or &#039;Excluded&#039; list. And, using the &#039;Wildcard&#039; feature, the consumer can &#039;Invite&#039; or &#039;Exclude&#039; entire area codes, prefixes or number sets. With the ID Screener, exemptions like those to the National &#039;Do Not Call&#039; List simply do not exist.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A snap to install, the Privacy Call ID Screener prevents telemarketing calls, predictive dialers, misdialed numbers, hang-up calls, false faxes, pollsters, political organizations, exes, creditors and anyone else the consumer doesn&#039;t want to talk to&#133;ever again. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additional benefits include a call-forwarding feature that, on a single line, seamlessly connects &#039;Invited&#039; callers to a cell phone or alternate location, as well as a &#039;Do Not Disturb&#039; mode. This feature prevents all callers from ringing the phone during set hours, such as bedtime and study time, either on a one-time or daily basis. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;The ID Screener is particularly useful for people who keep unusual hours, such as those working the graveyard or swing shifts,&quot; says Sasso. &quot;During &#039;Do Not Disturb&#039; hours, &#039;Invited&#039; callers can leave a message, but the phone will not ring, ensuring total privacy.&quot; A secret emergency code is provided in case of emergencies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Privacy Call ID Screener is the latest addition to the Privacy Call series, designed to help residential consumers and business owners better manage their telephone communications and reduce monthly telephone charges. Consisting of six different models, Privacy Call Series products are available at the Privacy Call website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.Privacy-Call.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.Privacy-Call.com&lt;/a&gt; or by calling (888) 833-5333.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning the &#8216;Do Not Call&#8217; List and blocking all unwanted calls, we are posting the latest information about our new release, the <a href="http://privacycall.com/pages/caller-id-screener-intro.htm" rel="nofollow">Privacy Call ID Screener</a>.  We consider it to be the ultimate solution for ending <i>all</i> annoying and unwanted calls to your home or business.<b></p>
<p>TECHNOLOGY TRIUMPHS OVER FTCâ??S â??DO NOT CALLâ? LIST<br />
New Caller ID Screener Allows Only &#8216;Invited&#8217; Callers to Ring &#8211; Free of Fees</b></p>
<p>Telemarketing companies and exempted groups may have found loopholes in the new National &quot;Do Not Call&quot; List, but telecom automation groundbreaker Bill Sasso of      Digitone Communications thwarts them again with his latest invention, the <a href="http://privacycall.com/pages/id-screener-3.htm" rel="nofollow">Privacy Call ID Screener</a>.</p>
<p>A small, tabletop device designed for customers who subscribe to Caller ID, the Privacy Call ID Screener allows only &#8216;Invited&#8217; callers to ring their phone. All other callers are handled as the consumer chooses. </p>
<p>Although the device is customizable, its use is simple. Callers on the consumer&#8217;s &#8216;Invited&#8217; list ring through without interference, while anonymous or unfamiliar callers are asked to identify themselves or leave a message, without ringing the phone. Callers on the consumer&#8217;s &#8216;Excluded&#8217; list cannot ring the phone or leave a message, including cell phone, out-of-state, and international callers.</p>
<p>&quot;We call it &#8216;Caller ID with attitude!&#8217;,&quot; says Sasso. &quot;Now consumers can choose who can ring their phone, and when, without the limits and extra monthly charges from your telephone service provider. Using the unit&#8217;s Caller ID screen, it only takes a push of a button to add callers to your &#8216;Included&#8217; or &#8216;Excluded&#8217; list. And, using the &#8216;Wildcard&#8217; feature, the consumer can &#8216;Invite&#8217; or &#8216;Exclude&#8217; entire area codes, prefixes or number sets. With the ID Screener, exemptions like those to the National &#8216;Do Not Call&#8217; List simply do not exist.&quot;</p>
<p>A snap to install, the Privacy Call ID Screener prevents telemarketing calls, predictive dialers, misdialed numbers, hang-up calls, false faxes, pollsters, political organizations, exes, creditors and anyone else the consumer doesn&#8217;t want to talk to&#8230;ever again. </p>
<p>Additional benefits include a call-forwarding feature that, on a single line, seamlessly connects &#8216;Invited&#8217; callers to a cell phone or alternate location, as well as a &#8216;Do Not Disturb&#8217; mode. This feature prevents all callers from ringing the phone during set hours, such as bedtime and study time, either on a one-time or daily basis. </p>
<p>&quot;The ID Screener is particularly useful for people who keep unusual hours, such as those working the graveyard or swing shifts,&quot; says Sasso. &quot;During &#8216;Do Not Disturb&#8217; hours, &#8216;Invited&#8217; callers can leave a message, but the phone will not ring, ensuring total privacy.&quot; A secret emergency code is provided in case of emergencies.</p>
<p>The Privacy Call ID Screener is the latest addition to the Privacy Call series, designed to help residential consumers and business owners better manage their telephone communications and reduce monthly telephone charges. Consisting of six different models, Privacy Call Series products are available at the Privacy Call website <a href="http://www.Privacy-Call.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Privacy-Call.com</a> or by calling (888) 833-5333.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27743</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 23:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27743</guid>
		<description>Verizon and other phone companies do sell the Call Intercept or Privacy Manager and call block services, but for these services your annual cost will be more than the one time cost of the InTeleScreener.  Ask your phone company if you can block them from calling to switch your long distance service.  Why would they block themselves from calling you and offering you additional services?

The Intelescreener can also block the &quot;Unknown&quot; or &quot;Unavailable&quot;, or &quot;Out of Area&quot; telemarketer calls in addition to specific number blocking, for those of you who did not know it or wrote out of your own assuming ingnorance without reviewing the Intelescreener product first.

There are laws against people breaking into your house but a lot of people seem to be buying alarm systems for additional protection.

There are too many loopholes in the DoNotCall list and just wait until the politicians start calling you every night for your vote or donation.  What will you do then? They are exempt from the DoNotCall list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon and other phone companies do sell the Call Intercept or Privacy Manager and call block services, but for these services your annual cost will be more than the one time cost of the InTeleScreener.  Ask your phone company if you can block them from calling to switch your long distance service.  Why would they block themselves from calling you and offering you additional services?</p>
<p>The Intelescreener can also block the &#8220;Unknown&#8221; or &#8220;Unavailable&#8221;, or &#8220;Out of Area&#8221; telemarketer calls in addition to specific number blocking, for those of you who did not know it or wrote out of your own assuming ingnorance without reviewing the Intelescreener product first.</p>
<p>There are laws against people breaking into your house but a lot of people seem to be buying alarm systems for additional protection.</p>
<p>There are too many loopholes in the DoNotCall list and just wait until the politicians start calling you every night for your vote or donation.  What will you do then? They are exempt from the DoNotCall list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Nieporent</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27742</link>
		<dc:creator>David Nieporent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2003 07:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27742</guid>
		<description>Radley, there are &quot;market alternatives to the federal list&quot; in the same way that there are market alternatives to small penises.  That is, if one is gullible enough to believe any marketing information one finds on the internet, one can find any service one wants.

Apparently you doesn&#039;t actually have Caller ID yourself.  If you did, you&#039;d realize that most telemarketers&#039; numbers don&#039;t show up.  Hence, your choice as a phone-owner is to let most telemarketers get through, or to block all calls from people with unlisted numbers, even if you want to talk to them.  (By definition, you can&#039;t selectively choose which of those people to let in, since there&#039;s no way to distinguish them from the others.)

Ultimately, I don&#039;t understand the point of your argument about &quot;market alternatives.&quot;  There are &quot;market alternatives&quot; to calling the police if homeless people decide to camp out in your living room, uninvited, but that&#039;s what the government is there for.  The fact that you could have locked your door or rented guard dogs or signed up with an alarm company in no way justifies the actions of said homeless people, and in no way makes your decision to call in the government to evict them illegitimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley, there are &#8220;market alternatives to the federal list&#8221; in the same way that there are market alternatives to small penises.  That is, if one is gullible enough to believe any marketing information one finds on the internet, one can find any service one wants.</p>
<p>Apparently you doesn&#8217;t actually have Caller ID yourself.  If you did, you&#8217;d realize that most telemarketers&#8217; numbers don&#8217;t show up.  Hence, your choice as a phone-owner is to let most telemarketers get through, or to block all calls from people with unlisted numbers, even if you want to talk to them.  (By definition, you can&#8217;t selectively choose which of those people to let in, since there&#8217;s no way to distinguish them from the others.)</p>
<p>Ultimately, I don&#8217;t understand the point of your argument about &#8220;market alternatives.&#8221;  There are &#8220;market alternatives&#8221; to calling the police if homeless people decide to camp out in your living room, uninvited, but that&#8217;s what the government is there for.  The fact that you could have locked your door or rented guard dogs or signed up with an alarm company in no way justifies the actions of said homeless people, and in no way makes your decision to call in the government to evict them illegitimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priorities &#38; Frivolities by Robert Garcia Tagorda (Boomshock)</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27749</link>
		<dc:creator>Priorities &#38; Frivolities by Robert Garcia Tagorda (Boomshock)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2003 08:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27749</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Calling the Right-of-Center&lt;/strong&gt;

Dan Drezner is refereeing a libertarian smackdown over the National Do Not Call Registry. In one corner stands Pejman Yousefzadeh, whose Tech Central Station essay concludes that &quot;conservatives and libertarians needn&#039;t feel discomfited by the creation ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Calling the Right-of-Center</strong></p>
<p>Dan Drezner is refereeing a libertarian smackdown over the National Do Not Call Registry. In one corner stands Pejman Yousefzadeh, whose Tech Central Station essay concludes that &#8220;conservatives and libertarians needn&#8217;t feel discomfited by the creation &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel W. Drezner</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27748</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel W. Drezner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27748</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Libertarian smackdown&lt;/strong&gt;

Radley Balko and Pejman Yousefzadeh have dueling articles in Tech Central Station over whether the Do Not Call registry -- about which I&#039;ve posted here -- is consistent with the libertarian credo. Start off with Yousefzadeh&#039;s original TCS essay. Then...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Libertarian smackdown</strong></p>
<p>Radley Balko and Pejman Yousefzadeh have dueling articles in Tech Central Station over whether the Do Not Call registry &#8212; about which I&#8217;ve posted here &#8212; is consistent with the libertarian credo. Start off with Yousefzadeh&#8217;s original TCS essay. Then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27741</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27741</guid>
		<description>Another alternative to the federal list is for me to hire a bruiser to go out and make telemarketers&#039; lives miserable. I guess I don&#039;t see why I should have to pay someone for the service/product of making other people leave me alone. It&#039;s not like I have to buy a gadget to filter out harassment. I still think the gov&#039;t is the right party to be the enforcer that tells nuisances to leave me alone and enact consequences for failure to comply.

-Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another alternative to the federal list is for me to hire a bruiser to go out and make telemarketers&#8217; lives miserable. I guess I don&#8217;t see why I should have to pay someone for the service/product of making other people leave me alone. It&#8217;s not like I have to buy a gadget to filter out harassment. I still think the gov&#8217;t is the right party to be the enforcer that tells nuisances to leave me alone and enact consequences for failure to comply.</p>
<p>-Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Doland</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27740</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27740</guid>
		<description>By that logic vandalism should be legal because the market provides for graffitti-removal services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By that logic vandalism should be legal because the market provides for graffitti-removal services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27739</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27739</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Verizon sells it, it&#039;s called Call Intercept and Call Block, and uses Caller ID to filter calls. Not gotten 1 telemarketing call since I&#039;ve signed up 6 months ago.  And I can also block specific numbers I don&#039;t want to be able to get thru.  Pretty simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Verizon sells it, it&#8217;s called Call Intercept and Call Block, and uses Caller ID to filter calls. Not gotten 1 telemarketing call since I&#8217;ve signed up 6 months ago.  And I can also block specific numbers I don&#8217;t want to be able to get thru.  Pretty simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27738</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27738</guid>
		<description>My point isn&#039;t that the do-not-call list will hurt companies like this.  It&#039;s that companies like this exist, which means there are market alternatives to the federal list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point isn&#8217;t that the do-not-call list will hurt companies like this.  It&#8217;s that companies like this exist, which means there are market alternatives to the federal list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Doland</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/08/21/yes-virginia-there-really-is-a-anti-telemarketer-market/comment-page-1/#comment-27737</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 05:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=2956#comment-27737</guid>
		<description>Arguing against the &quot;Do Not Call&quot; registry simply because it will harm the emergent anti-telemarketer-product market is a clear application of the broken-window fallacy.

I would tend to think that this would actually be *good* for economic efficiency (and for  telemarketers) as it may reduce the number of non-responsive no-sale phone calls they have to make. Anyone motivated enough to put themself (voluntarily) on this list probably isn&#039;t worth the expense of calling.

But I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguing against the &#8220;Do Not Call&#8221; registry simply because it will harm the emergent anti-telemarketer-product market is a clear application of the broken-window fallacy.</p>
<p>I would tend to think that this would actually be *good* for economic efficiency (and for  telemarketers) as it may reduce the number of non-responsive no-sale phone calls they have to make. Anyone motivated enough to put themself (voluntarily) on this list probably isn&#8217;t worth the expense of calling.</p>
<p>But I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

