«
»

More on Dean

Monday, July 21st, 2003

Via the comments section, Zoe Mitchell directs us to “Granite Staters for Medical Marijuana,” which issues the following grades for those currently announced for president:

Dennis Kucinich: A

John Kerry: B+

Bob Graham: C-

Joe Lieberman: D+

Dick Gephardt: D

John Edwards: D-

George W. Bush: F

Howard Dean: F

Carol Moseley-Braun: ?

Al Sharpton: Incomplete

In the words of the great Solomon Burke: “Well I guess I’m gonna have to sit this one out.”

Digg it |  reddit |  del.icio.us |  Fark

This entry was posted on Monday, July 21st, 2003 at 6:43 pm by Radley Balko and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “More on Dean”

  1. #1 |  hector |  July 21st, 2003 at 10:44 pm

    Don’t know if you know about this or not, http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030721&s=vest
    but what do you think of this new appointee?

    She is slated to be the new head of the DEA.

  2. #2 |  Bones |  July 22nd, 2003 at 5:07 am

    Just goes to show you that you should always read the fine print.

    Their award of an F for Dean is pure spite. Dean is NOT an opponant of medical marijuana, he merely want’s to see it tested and regulated just like any other drug. Dean tried to kill a bill in the VT legislature on the grounds that it bypassed the normal FDA process for medical marijuana. But the bill passed anyway, so what did he do. He signed it into law. (the bastard)

    If they they give Dean an F for being a skeptic but not an opponant, what grade do they give people who are actually against it? Well, F, of course.

    Morons.

  3. #3 |  redjade |  July 25th, 2003 at 2:49 pm

    frankly, i do not care.

    we need to defeat George W Bush – period.

    I am not convinced that Dean can win against W, but if he can – i will support him.

    short of leiberman, i will support ANY dem candidate against George W.

    and I’m a far far leftie saying this – we must defeat this guy in the next election – assuming that there will be another election.