The Sign Pointing to Boston Isn’t Actually in Boston

Saturday, May 3rd, 2003

Your vices — sinful, regretful, damnable.

My vices — not so bad.

The guy lost $1.4 million in one two month stretch. But he doesn’t have a problem. Cancer patients who want to smoke marijuana — they’re the ones who have a problem.

Schmuck.

Digg it |  reddit |  del.icio.us |  Fark

6 Responses to “The Sign Pointing to Boston Isn’t Actually in Boston”

  1. #1 |  John T. Kennedy | 

    I don’t see that the problem is hypocrisy:

    http://www.no-treason.com/comments.php?id=P327_0_1_0_C

    Would the situation be improved if he always practiced what he preached? I say no. His gambling isn’t an offense against anyone and his his real offenses have nothing to do with his gambling.

  2. #2 |  Joshua Claybourn | 

    When has Bennett labeled gambling as a vice?

  3. #3 |  Sean Hackbarth | 

    Radley is just one of those types who cringes when anyone criticses others behaviors. I guess unless you’re perfect then you should criticise. That would make for a very quiet blogosphere.

  4. #4 |  Boo | 

    I would say that Radley has little tolerance for ‘holier than thou’ righteousness which Bennett seems to have in copious amounts.