<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs and Celebs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2003/01/21/blogs-and-celebs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/01/21/blogs-and-celebs/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/01/21/blogs-and-celebs/comment-page-1/#comment-16226</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1754#comment-16226</guid>
		<description>Who the hell are you...to criticize yourself for not being an expert?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who the hell are you&#8230;to criticize yourself for not being an expert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/01/21/blogs-and-celebs/comment-page-1/#comment-16225</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1754#comment-16225</guid>
		<description>Steve -

I think I sense an agenda...

(Not that I&#039;m too familiar with the politics of Tom Orbourne and Jim Bunning)

It&#039;s not a very good practice to defend your own team by pointing out that the other team is worse.

Ted Nugent, by the way, speaks from a lifetime of experience with hunting and firearms.  That&#039;s why you don&#039;t hear much from him about foreign policy, health care, etc.

I will grant you, however, that it is much easier to listen to a celeb &quot;mouth-off&quot; when they support your own view.

The Nuge speaks from an informed, experienced angle, while George Cloony, for example, is simply &quot;mouthing-off&quot;.

Besides, when did Babs or Clooney EVER create something as cool as Wango Tango?

Like the first poster, however, I fully support everyone&#039;s right to be an idiot, and Clooney is fully exercising that right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve -</p>
<p>I think I sense an agenda&#8230;</p>
<p>(Not that I&#8217;m too familiar with the politics of Tom Orbourne and Jim Bunning)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a very good practice to defend your own team by pointing out that the other team is worse.</p>
<p>Ted Nugent, by the way, speaks from a lifetime of experience with hunting and firearms.  That&#8217;s why you don&#8217;t hear much from him about foreign policy, health care, etc.</p>
<p>I will grant you, however, that it is much easier to listen to a celeb &#8220;mouth-off&#8221; when they support your own view.</p>
<p>The Nuge speaks from an informed, experienced angle, while George Cloony, for example, is simply &#8220;mouthing-off&#8221;.</p>
<p>Besides, when did Babs or Clooney EVER create something as cool as Wango Tango?</p>
<p>Like the first poster, however, I fully support everyone&#8217;s right to be an idiot, and Clooney is fully exercising that right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/01/21/blogs-and-celebs/comment-page-1/#comment-16224</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1754#comment-16224</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s okay to ridicule them for the message and the reasons why they choose to spout out that message.  If the Funny Girl thinks (and this is pure speculation on my part, but it seems likely) that people should listen to her because she&#039;s a celebrity and that her celebrity status makes her the authority on issues, then I say bash away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s okay to ridicule them for the message and the reasons why they choose to spout out that message.  If the Funny Girl thinks (and this is pure speculation on my part, but it seems likely) that people should listen to her because she&#8217;s a celebrity and that her celebrity status makes her the authority on issues, then I say bash away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/01/21/blogs-and-celebs/comment-page-1/#comment-16223</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1754#comment-16223</guid>
		<description>Radley,
I think the difference in you and someone like Babs or any other celebrity who tries to voice themselves is that first they *are* using their fame to get their message across.
Secondly, they aren&#039;t up for rebuttal. If I disagree with you, I just tell you, Hey, I don&#039;t like that notion. 
But to disagree with Bono, you would need Bruce Springsteen saying publicly that what Bono said was moronic, therefore having the same impact on the sheep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley,<br />
I think the difference in you and someone like Babs or any other celebrity who tries to voice themselves is that first they *are* using their fame to get their message across.<br />
Secondly, they aren&#8217;t up for rebuttal. If I disagree with you, I just tell you, Hey, I don&#8217;t like that notion.<br />
But to disagree with Bono, you would need Bruce Springsteen saying publicly that what Bono said was moronic, therefore having the same impact on the sheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/01/21/blogs-and-celebs/comment-page-1/#comment-16222</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1754#comment-16222</guid>
		<description>slap the celebs...

Here&#039;s more names to add to the list of celebs who mouth off (or at least have in the past).

Ronald Reagan (the prime example of the danger of celebrity sticking their noses in policy), Sonny Bono, Charlton Heston, Ted Nugent (the author of Wango Tango taken seriously??)   

and athletes turned policy wonks are no better...JC Watts, Tom Osbourne, Steve Largent, Jim Bunning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slap the celebs&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s more names to add to the list of celebs who mouth off (or at least have in the past).</p>
<p>Ronald Reagan (the prime example of the danger of celebrity sticking their noses in policy), Sonny Bono, Charlton Heston, Ted Nugent (the author of Wango Tango taken seriously??)   </p>
<p>and athletes turned policy wonks are no better&#8230;JC Watts, Tom Osbourne, Steve Largent, Jim Bunning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/01/21/blogs-and-celebs/comment-page-1/#comment-16221</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1754#comment-16221</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right. We are all entitled to our opinions. However, I reserve the right to criticize or ridicule both the celebrity in question and Congress when they invite celebrities to testify at Congressional hearings based only on their celebrity and not on any specialized knowledge they happen to possess.

Such as this one:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.massnews.com/2002_editions/04_Apr/043002_mn4.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.massnews.com/2002_editions/04_Apr/043002_mn4.shtml&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. We are all entitled to our opinions. However, I reserve the right to criticize or ridicule both the celebrity in question and Congress when they invite celebrities to testify at Congressional hearings based only on their celebrity and not on any specialized knowledge they happen to possess.</p>
<p>Such as this one:<br />
<a href="http://www.massnews.com/2002_editions/04_Apr/043002_mn4.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.massnews.com/2002_editions/04_Apr/043002_mn4.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2003/01/21/blogs-and-celebs/comment-page-1/#comment-16220</link>
		<dc:creator>brian keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1754#comment-16220</guid>
		<description>You know, you&#039;re right. I think I&#039;ll try and join in on the idea of criticizing the CONTENT of a person&#039;s argument instead of challenging their right to say it. This is a very good idea. I guess the bottom line is that we all have the right to be idiots...  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, you&#8217;re right. I think I&#8217;ll try and join in on the idea of criticizing the CONTENT of a person&#8217;s argument instead of challenging their right to say it. This is a very good idea. I guess the bottom line is that we all have the right to be idiots&#8230;  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

