Comments on: I Can’t Stand Up for Falling Down http://www.theagitator.com/2002/12/14/i-cant-stand-up-for-falling-down/ It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:54:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: autoinsurance http://www.theagitator.com/2002/12/14/i-cant-stand-up-for-falling-down/comment-page-1/#comment-14081 autoinsurance Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:17:05 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1481#comment-14081 autoinsurance <a / rel="nofollow">autoinsurance autoinsurance autoinsurance

]]> By: insurance auto http://www.theagitator.com/2002/12/14/i-cant-stand-up-for-falling-down/comment-page-1/#comment-14080 insurance auto Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:35:37 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1481#comment-14080 Hi! <a href="http://www.insurance-top.com/company/" rel="nofollow">http://www.insurance-top.com/company/</a> car site insurance. compare car insurance, auto insurance, insurance car. from website . Hi! http://www.insurance-top.com/company/ car site insurance. compare car insurance, auto insurance, insurance car. from website .

]]> By: Conor O'Brien http://www.theagitator.com/2002/12/14/i-cant-stand-up-for-falling-down/comment-page-1/#comment-14079 Conor O'Brien Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:38:32 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1481#comment-14079 Ditto on the regrettable tone at StandDown. If that blog is an attempt to find common, thoughtful ground between antiwar libertarians and leftists, I think it's failing. It has a bitter, "indymedia" kind of feel that's very offputting. I've wondered for a while why libertarian bloggers like you and Gene Healy still contribute there when it's obvious that you're barely being tolerated. Granted, I'm undecided on the war question, but StandDown is doing little to convince me to take your side. My reaction has been more along the lines of, "If these are the people against the war, sign me up for the other side." (Present blogger excluded, of course). Ditto on the regrettable tone at StandDown. If that blog is an attempt to find common, thoughtful ground between antiwar libertarians and leftists, I think it’s failing. It has a bitter, “indymedia” kind of feel that’s very offputting. I’ve wondered for a while why libertarian bloggers like you and Gene Healy still contribute there when it’s obvious that you’re barely being tolerated. Granted, I’m undecided on the war question, but StandDown is doing little to convince me to take your side. My reaction has been more along the lines of, “If these are the people against the war, sign me up for the other side.” (Present blogger excluded, of course).

]]> By: rufus http://www.theagitator.com/2002/12/14/i-cant-stand-up-for-falling-down/comment-page-1/#comment-14078 rufus Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:07:44 +0000 http://dev.theagitator.com/?p=1481#comment-14078 Great post Radley. I've been a bit disappointed at the level of discourse over at Stand Down myself. Glad somebody finally spoke up. What's weird is that if you look at that Hogan guy's "blog", well, there really isn't anything there. It's got 2 messages, one of which says "this is a test", and 3 or 4 links. Looks to me like a cheaply cynical way of getting your comments out of the comment section, and onto the main page. I'm sure Julian and Max don't have hardcoded policies on what actually constitutes a "blog", but this has to fall short however you cut it. Great post Radley. I’ve been a bit disappointed at the level of discourse over at Stand Down myself. Glad somebody finally spoke up.

What’s weird is that if you look at that Hogan guy’s “blog”, well, there really isn’t anything there. It’s got 2 messages, one of which says “this is a test”, and 3 or 4 links.

Looks to me like a cheaply cynical way of getting your comments out of the comment section, and onto the main page.

I’m sure Julian and Max don’t have hardcoded policies on what actually constitutes a “blog”, but this has to fall short however you cut it.

]]>